Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:05:33.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12.—Further Observations on some Lower Carboniferous Seeds and Cupules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. G. Long
Affiliation:
Hancock Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Synopsis

Twenty-eight specimens of the seed genus Dolichosperma have been examined. Fourteen are assigned to D. sexangulatum Long; these possess six or seven integumental lobes which extend apically as free tentacles equal in length to the seed body except when damaged or broken off. Fourteen other specimens are named D. pentagonum sp. nov. These are smaller and usually have five integumental lobes (less commonly six or seven). Long apical tentacles have not been seen in this species.

Evidence is adduced that Anasperma burnense Long is the mature prothallial seed developed from the ovule Eurystoma trigona Long.

Eurystoma angulare Long sometimes possesses five integumental lobes and the free apical lobes vary in length.

Compressed megaspores macerated from cupules of Stamnostoma huttonense Long sometimes have three abortive spores in a compact group at the apex.

Ovules of Eccroustosperma langtonense Long were borne in small bunches (probably pendent) on short pedicels; one specimen of this seed shows three well-developed separate abortive spores around the apex of the functional megaspore.

The cupule of Calathospermum fimbriatum Barnard shows a structure suggesting that it may have evolved from a pair of cupules. Twelve to fourteen ovules were sometimes formed in the entire cupule though most of these were probably abortive.

Some possible seed embryos are described and discussed, and an outline classification of seeds in the order Lagenostomales is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Barnard, P. D. W., 1960. Calathospermum fimbriatum sp. nov., a Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm Cupule from Scotland. Palaeontology, 3, 265275.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. T., 1941. On Salpingostoma dasu: A New Carboniferous Seed from East Lothian. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 60, 427464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1960 a. Stamnostoma huttonense gen. et sp. nov.—a Pteridosprem Seed and Cupule from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 201215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1960 b. On the Structure of Samaropsis scotica Calder (emended) and Eurystoma angulare gen. et sp. nov., Petrified Seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 261280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1961. Some Pteridosperm Seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 401419.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1962. Tristichia ovensi gen. et sp. nov., a Protostelic Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm from Berwickshire and East Lothian, with an Account of some Associated Seeds and Cupules. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 477489.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1965. On the Cupule Structure of Eurystoma angulare. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 66, 111128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1966. Some Lower Carboniferous Fructifications from Berwickshire, together with a Theoretical Account of the Evolution of Ovules, Cupules, and Carpels, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 66, 345375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1969. Eurystoma trigona sp. nov., a Pteridosperm ovule borne on a frond of Alcicornopteris Kidston. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 68, 171182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettitt, J. M., 1969. Pteridophytic features in some Lower Carboniferous seed megaspores. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), 62, 233239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1917. Fossil Plants, 3, 308318. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. H., 1931. The Early Evolution of the Angiosperms. Ann. Bot., 45, 646.Google Scholar