Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T20:52:28.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philological Marginalia on a Grammatical Study of Old Chinese: A Review of Aspects of Classical Chinese Syntax, by Christoph Harbsmeier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2015

Derek Herforth
Derek Herforth*
Affiliation:
Suzugamine Women's College, 4-6-18 Inokuchi, Nishi-ku, Hiroshima 733, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles and Book Reviews
Information
Early China , Volume 11 , 1985 , pp. 209 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Study of Early China 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. “Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, topics and points of view.” In Subject and Topic, edited by Li, Charles N., pp. 27–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ren, Chao Yuen. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mengjia, Chen. 1956. Buci zongshu (A comprehensive discussion of oracle-bone inscriptions). Beijing: Kexue chubanshe .Google Scholar
Dain, Alphonse. 1964. Les manuscrits (nouvel le édition revue). Paris: Société d'édition ‘Les Belles Lettres’.Google Scholar
Demiéville, Paul. 1950. “Archaismes de prononciation en chinois vulgaire.” T'oung Pao 40:1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. “Ergativity.” Language 55:59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, W. A. C. H. 1959. Late Archaic Chinese. Toronto: The University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gablentz, Georg von der. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1984a. “Review of Aspects of Classical Chinese Syntax, by Christoph Harbsmeier.” Acta Orientalia 45:196–204.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C.. 1984b. “Review of Chinese Classics: Tao te ching, translated by D. C. Lau.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47:387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
yanjiushi, Guojia wenwuju guwenxian ed. 1980. Mawanqdui Han mu baishu (yi) (—) (Silk manuscripts from the Han tombs at Mawangdui [One]). Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe .Google Scholar
Xiliang, Guoet al., eds. 1981. Gudai Hanyu (Ancient Chinese language), vol. 1. Beijing: Beijing chubanshe .Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. “Conditionals are topics.” Language 54:564–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosiono. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhengrong, Han 1984. Gu Hanyu xuci shouce (Handbook of ancient Chinese particles). Changchun: Jilin renmin chubanshe .Google Scholar
Lau, D. C. trans. 1970. Mencius. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fanggui, Li. 1980. Shariggu yin yanjiu (Studies in Old Chinese phonology). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan .Google Scholar
Zhong, Ma. 1983. Gudai Hanyu yufa (Ancient Chinese grammar). Jinan: Shandong jiaoyu chubanshe .Google Scholar
Fumio, Otake, Takeo, Otake trans. 1962. Shiki-Honki, shohyō, seka hen: Sekai bungaku taikei (The Shiji - Basic annals, tables, and hereditary houses: Compendium of world literature), 5A. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō .Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. 1959. “Fei wei and certain related words.” In Studia Serica Bernhard Karlgren Dedicata, edited by Egerod, S. and Glahn, E., pp. 178–189. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., 1973. “Some new hypotheses concerning word families in Chinese.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1:111–125.Google Scholar
chubanshe, Shanghai guji ed. 1984. Ershisi shi jizhuan xuanyi congshu, Shiji jizhuan xuanyi (Compendium of selected translations from biographies in the twenty-four histories: selected translations from the Shiji), vol, 1. ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
Stimson, Hugh M. 1971. “Sheirshwu ‘who, whom’ and moh ‘none’ in Old Chinese.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 91:447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, Hugh M.. 1972. “More on Peking Archaisms.” T'oung Pao 63.1-5:172–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ken'ichl, Takashima. 1973. “Negatives in the King Wu-ting Bone Inscriptions.” Ph. D. dissertation. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1985. “Conditional Markers.” In Iconicity in Syntax, edited by Haiman, John, pp. 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fengfu, Tsao. 1982. “The Double Nominative Construction in Mandarin Chinese.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, n.s. 14.1-2:275–297.Google Scholar
Waley, A., trans. 1938. The Analects of Confucius. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Waley, A., trans. 1937. The Book of Songs (Evergreen edition). 1960 Reprint. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Li, Wang. 1928. Tong yuan zidian (Etymological dictionary). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan .Google Scholar
Shuda, Yang. 1929. Ciquan (Explanation of particles.) Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Kenkō, Yoshida, trans. 1982. Shiki (The Shiji), pt. 7 (Seka [Hereditary houses], vol. 3): Shinshaku kanbun taikei (Compendium of Chinese literature newly translated), vol. 87. Tokyo: Meijl shoin .Google Scholar
Fagao, Zhou. 1961. Zhongguo gudai yufa, zaoju (Ancient Chinese grammar, sentence structure), vol. 1. Zhongyang yanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiuso zhuankan (Monographs of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica), no. 39. Reprint, 1972. Taipei: Tailian guofeng chubanshe .Google Scholar
Zhongling, Zhouet al. 1982. Hanfeizi soyin (Concordance to the Hanfeizi). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju .Google Scholar