Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:17:43.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of Chinese Culture: Some Russian and ChineseViews

Review products

VasllievL.S.“Proiskhozhdenie drevnekitaiskoitsivilizatsii” (The origin of ancient Chinese civilization).Problemy istorii1974:12.86–102.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books and Articles
Information
Early China , Volume 2 , Fall 1976 , pp. 60 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Study of Early China 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

FOOTNOTES

1. Mongait, A.L., Arkheologiya i sovremennost' (Archeology and the contemporary world; Moscow, 1963), p. 52 Google Scholar.

2. Artanovskii, S.N., Istoricheskoe edinstvo chelovechestva i vzaimnoe vilyanie kul'tur (The historical unity of mankind and the reciprocal influence of cultures; Leningrad, 1967)Google Scholar.

3. Childe, V.G., “A Prehistorian's Interpretation of Diffusion,” in Independence, Convergence and Borrowing in Institutions, thought and Art (Cambridge, Mass., 1937), p. 4 Google Scholar.

4. Forbes, R.J., Man the Maker (London, 1950), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar; Needham, J., Science and Civilization in China, volo 1 (Cambridge, 1954), p. 229 Google Scholar; Harrison, H.S., “Discovery, Invention and Diffusion,” in A History of Technology (Oxford, 1954), p. 64 Google Scholar.

5. Solheim, W.G. II, “New Directions in Southeast Asian Prehistory,” Anthropoloqica N, S. 11.1 (1969)Google Scholar; Kwang-chih, Chang, “Fengpltou, Tapengeng and the Prehistory of Taiwan,” (New Haven, 1969)Google Scholar; Chard, C., “Early Radiocarbon for Pottery in Japan and its Implications,” in Proceedings of the VII. International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnographic Studies (1970)Google Scholar.

6. Vavilov, N. I., Problema proiskhozhdeniya mlrovogo zemledeliya v svete sovremmenikh issledovanii (The problem of the origin of argiculture in light of contemporary researches; Moscow-Leningrad, 1932)Google Scholar; Sauer, O., Agricultural Origins and Dispersals (New York, 1952), p. 21 Google Scholar; Coulborn, R., The Origin of Civilized Societies (Princeton, 1959), p. 53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Zhukovskii, P.M., Kul'turnye rasteniya i ikh sorodichi (Cultivated plants and related species; Moscow, 1964)Google Scholar; Reed, C.A., “Animal Domestication in the Prehistoric Near East,” Science 130:1629–1638 (1959)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Zeuner, F.E., A History of Domesticated Animals (London, 1963)Google Scholar.

8. Masson, V.M., Srednyaya Aziya i Drevnii Vostok (Central Asia and the ancient Orient; Moscow, 1964)Google Scholar, and Poselenie Dzheitun (The Dzheitun settlement; Moscow, 1971)Google Scholar.

9. Bulling, A., The Meaning of China's Most Ancient Art (Leiden, 1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tybakov, B.A., “Kosmogoniyai mifologiya zemledel'tsev eneollta” (The cosmogony and mythology of the eneolithic argriculturalists), Sovetskaya arkheologiya 1, 2 (1965)Google Scholar.

10. Chinese scholars have Increasingly rejected this view.

11. Andersson, J.G., “Researches into the Prehistory of the Chinese,” BMFEA 15:287–291 (1943)Google Scholar.

12. Kryukov, M.V., “U istokov drevnikh kul'tur Vostochnoi Azii” (At the sources of the ancient cultures of East Asia), Narody Axii i Afriki 6 (1964)Google Scholar.

13. Te-k'un, Cheng, Archaeology in China, vols. 1-3 (Cambridge, 1959, 1960, 1963)Google Scholar; Kwang-chih, Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China, 1st and 2nd eds. (New Haven, 1964, 1968)Google Scholar.

14. Chang Kwang-chih, op. cit. (1964), p. 54.

15. Miao-ti-kou yü San-li-ch'iao (Peking, 1959)Google Scholar; Hsi-an Pan-p'o (Peking, 1963)Google Scholar.

16. An chih-min (in Hsi-an Pan-p'o); Chien-fang, Yang, “Critique of Miao-ti-kou yü San-li-ch'iao ,” K'ao-ku 1961:4 Google Scholar; Ju-tso, Wu and Chi-ch'ang, Yang, “Certain problems in the monograph Miao-ti-kou yü San-li-ch'iao ,” K'ao-ku 1961:1 Google Scholar; Li, Wu and Shih-ch'üan, Chang in K'ao-ku 1961:7 Google Scholar; and others.

17. Hsing-pang, Shih, “Certain problems in the Ma-chia-yao culture,” K'ao-ku 1962:3.326 Google Scholar; Ping-ch'i, Su “Certain problems in the Yang-shao culture,” K'ao-ku hsüeh-pao 1965:1 Google Scholar; Shih-kuei, Li and Ch'i, Tseng, “On the question of the character-ization and dating of the San-li-ch'ao/Yang-shao culture,” K'ao-ku 1965:11 Google Scholar.

18. Te-yung, Kuo, “Archaeological investigation in the districts of Wei-yüan, Lung-hsi, and Wu-shan on the upper Wei River in Kansu,” K'ao-ku t'ung-hsün 1958:7–8 Google Scholar; Hsüeh-cheng, Chang, “Monuments of the ancient cultures of Kansu Province,” K'ao-ku hsüeh-pao 1960:2.12–13 Google Scholar.

19. Hsüeh-cheng, Chang, “Report on archaeological investigation in the districts of Lin-t'ao and Lin-hsia, Kansu,” K'ao-ku t'unq-hsün 1958:9.38–41 Google Scholar.

20. Chih-min, An, “On the problem of the dating of the primitive cultures of China,” K'ao-ku 1972:1.58 Google Scholar; Mo-jo, Kuo, “The development of the types of ancient Chinese writing,” xK'ao-ku 1972:3.2 Google Scholar.

21. Butomo, S. V., “Primenenie radiouglerodnogo metoda v arkheologii” (The use of the radiocarbon method in archaeology), Novye metody v arkheologicheskikh issledovaniyakh (New methods in archaeological research; Moscow-Leningrad, 1963)Google Scholar.

22. Chien-fang, Yang, “On the peHodization of the Yang-shao and Ma-chia-yao cultures,” K'ao-ku hsüeh-pao 1962:1.70 Google Scholar.

23. Hsüeh-cheng, Chang, “Lin-t'ao and Lin-hsia,” p. 39 Google Scholar.

24. Fairservis, W. A., The Origins of Oriental Civilizations (New York, 1964), pp. 103–114 Google Scholar.

25. Allchin, B. and Allchin, R., The Birth of Indian Civilization (1968), pp. 158–160 Google Scholar.

26. Khlopin, I. N., “Vozniknovenie skotovodstva i obshchestvennoe razdelenie truda v pervobytnom obshchestve” (The rise of animal husbandry and the division of labor in primitive society), in Leninskie idei v izuchenii istorii pervobytnogo obshchestva, rabovladeniya i feodalizma (Lenin's ideas in the study of the history of primitive society, slave ownership and feudalism; Moscow, 1970)Google Scholar.

27. Te-yung, Kuo, “Report on excavations at the Huan-niang-t'ai site, Wu-wei hslen, Kansu,” K'ao-ku hsüeh-pao 1960:2 Google Scholar; Bylin-Altchin, M., “Ch'i-chia-p'ing and Lo-han-t'ag.” BMFEA 18 (1946)Google Scholar.

28. Miao-ti-kou yü San-li-ch'iao and Feng-hsi fa-ch'u pao-kao (Peking, 1962)Google Scholar.

29. Tzu-fan, Yang and Szu-li, Wang, “Lung-shan culture,” K'ao-ku 1963:7 Google Scholar.

30. Hsüeh-shan, Chin, “Report on the excavations of 958-1961 in in the Yün-hsien and Chün-hsien districts of Hupei,” K'ao-ku 1961:10 Google Scholar; Ching-shan Ch'ü-chia-ling (Peking, 1965)Google Scholar; Huan-chang, Yin et al., “Report on the excavations at the Ta-tun-tzu site near Szu-hung-chen, P'el-hsien, Kiangsu,” K'ao-ku hsüeh-pao 1964:2 Google Scholar; Treistman, J. Mo, Ch'i-chia-ling and the Early Cultures of the Hanshui Valley, China,” Asian Perspectives 11 (1970)Google Scholar.

31. Its, R. F., Etnicheskaya istoriya yuga Vostochnoi Azii (Ethnic history of Southeast Asia; Leningrad, 1972)Google Scholar; M. V. Kryukov, op. cit., p. 95.

32. Yün-ming, T'ang, “The similarity of the ceramic Inventory of the Lung-shan and the Yin,” Wen-wu ts'an-k'ao tzu-liao 1958:6.67–69 Google Scholar; Chang Kwang-chih, op. cit. (1968), p. 236 (table).

33. Barnard, N., Bronze Casting and Bronze Alloys in Ancient China (Tokyo, 1961), pp. 59, 108, etc.Google Scholar

34. Aitchison, L., A History of Metals, vol. 1 (London, 1960)Google Scholar.

35. Karlgren, B., “Some Weapons and Tools from the Yin Dynasty,” BMFEA 17:147 (1945)Google Scholar; Kiselev, S. V., “Neolit bronzovyl vek Kitaya” (The Chinese neolithic and bronze age), Sovetskaya arkheologiya 4 (1960)Google Scholar; Chlenova, N. L., Khrohoiogiya pamyatnikov karasukskoi epokhi (Chronology of the remains of the Karasuk epoch; Moscow, 1972), pp. 131–139 Google Scholar.

36. Loehr, M., Chinese Bronze Age Weapons (Ann Arbor, 1956), pp. 25–32 Google Scholar.

37. Kozhin, P. M., “K voprosu o prolskhozhdenii in'skikh kolesnlts” (On the question of the origin of the Yin chariots), in Kul'tura narodov zarubezhnoi Azii i Okeanii (The culture of the peoples of non-Soviet Asia and Oceania; Leningrad, 1969), pp. 29–40 Google Scholar.

38. Chlenova, N. L., Proiskhozhdenie i ranyaya istoriya piemen tagarskoi kul'tury (Tne origin and early history of the Tagar peoples; Moscow, 1967)Google Scholar.

39. Wesiliev, L. S., “Certain Aspects of Ancient Chinese Religion,” paper for XVII. International Congress of Orientalists (Moscow, 1967)Google Scholar; and Kul'ty, reliaii, traditsii v Kitae (Cuits, religions ana traditions 1n China; Moscow, 1970), pp. 82–86 Google Scholar.

40. Hsieh-chün, Mao and Yin, Yen, “Report on study of the teeth of the Yin people from Anyang and Hui-hsien,” Ku-chi-jui tung-wu yü ku-jen-lei 1959:1.2:81–85 and 1959:1.1:165–171Google Scholar; Chi, Li, “Importance of the Anyang Discoveries in Prefacing Known Chinese History with a New Chapter,” Proceedings of the Eighth Pacific Science Congress vol. 1 (1955). pp. 433–434 Google Scholar.

41. de Lacouperie, T., Western Origin of the Early Chinese Civilization (London, 1894), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar; Cordier, H., Histoire Générale de la Chine vol. 1 (Paris, 1920), pp. 33–34 Google Scholar; de Saussure, L., “Le Système cosmologique Sino-Iranien,” Journal Asiatique 202 (1923)Google Scholar; Hashimoto, M., Ueber die astronomische Zeiteinteilung im alten China (Tokyo, 1943)Google Scholar; J. Needham, Op. cit. vol. 2 (Cambridge, 1956), p. 354.

42. Karlgren, B., Philology and Ancient China (Oslo, 1926)Google Scholar.

43. Kuo Mo-jo, Op. cit.

44. Ball, C. J., Chinese and Sumerians (London, 1913)Google Scholar.

45. Karlgren, B., “Grammata Serica,” BMFEA 12 (1940)Google Scholar; “Grammata Serica Recensa,” BMFEA 29 (1957)Google Scholar.

46. Pulleyblank, E. G., “Chinese and Indo-Europeans” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society pt, 1-2 (1966)Google Scholar; Ulenbrook, J., “Einige Übereinstimmungen zwischen dem Chinesischen und dem Indogermanisehen,” Anthropos 62.3, 4 (1967)Google Scholar; “Zum chinesisehen Wort hüe für ‘Blut’,” Anthropos 63/64.1, 2 (1968–1969)Google Scholar; and “Zum chinesischen Wort ti,” Anthropos 65.3,4 (1970)Google Scholar; Ulving, T., “Indo-European Elements in Chinese?” Anthropos 63/64.5, 6 (1968–1969)Google Scholar.

47. Chia-hsiang, Ch'en, “Communication on the excavations of the Lo-ta-miao Shang settlement in Cheng-chou,” Wen-wu ts'an-k'ao tzu-liao 1957:10 Google Scholar.

48. Yu-sheng, Fang, “Report on the excavations at Erh-li-t'ou, Yen-shih, Honan, K'ao-ku 1965:5 Google Scholar.

49. Cheng-chou Erh-li-kang (Peking, 1959)Google Scholar.

50. Childe, Op. cit.; Herzfeld, E., Iran in the Ancient East (London-New York, 1941), pp. 157–161 Google Scholar; Istoriya Sibiri vol. 1 (History of Siberia; Moscow, 1968), pp. 174–179 Google Scholar.

51. W. A. Fairservis, Opo cit., p. 130; Stover, L. E., The Cultural Ecology of Chinese Civilization (New York, 1974), p. 43 Google Scholar.