Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:04:01.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Untangling the Racialization of Disabilities

An Intersectionality Critique Across Disability Models1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2014

Alfredo J. Artiles
Alfredo J. Artiles*
Affiliation:
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University
*
Professor Alfredo J. Artiles, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Interdisciplinary B, Room B353, 1120 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287-1811. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article advances an intersectional perspective in the analysis of racial inequities in special education so that theoretical refinement of this problem will strengthen educational equity research and theory. Racial disproportionality in some disability categories continues to affect a sizable number of students in the United States, with dire long-term consequences for the educational trajectories of these learners. After more than four decades, the problem continues to be debated in research, practice, and policy circles. There is consensus among researchers that the racialization of disability embodies complexities that defy linear explanations. But this debate has overlooked the potential of intersectionality to document complexity and to transcend the individual-structure binary that tends to permeate previous scholarship. Indeed, intersectionality's explicit attention to how the complexity of people's everyday experiences is connected to larger historical processes could offer key insights. I analyze how disproportionality research has addressed the intersections of race and disability (along with other markers of oppression) through a contrapuntal reading of works framed with medical, social, and cultural disability models. I conclude with reflections for future research on racial disparities in special education that is mindful of intersectional complexity.

Keywords

DisabilityRaceIntersectionalityDisability ModelsContrapuntal Analysis
Type
Intersectionality
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Fall 2013 , pp. 329 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I acknowledge the support of the Equity Alliance and I am grateful to the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University for the residential fellowship that allowed me to research and articulate the theoretical foundations of this analysis. Endorsement by these organizations of the ideas expressed in this manuscript should not be inferred. Earlier versions of this article were presented as keynote lectures/plenary talks at the Emerging Scholars Conference, Chapman University (September 2011), the 2011 annual meeting of the National Association of Multicultural Education, and the Race and Disability Lecture Series at the University of Illinois-Chicago (February 2013). I am grateful to Phil Ferguson, Kris Gutierrez, Elizabeth Kozleski, Tom Skrtic, Stan Trent, and the Sociocultural Research Group for their encouragement and substantive feedback and suggestions. I also acknowledge the feedback of three anonymous reviewers; their critiques and suggestions improved the quality of this article. I remain responsible, however, for the shortcomings of this work.

References

REFERENCES

Albrecht, Susan F., Skiba, Russell J., Losen, Daniel J., Chung, Choong-Geun, and Middelberg, Laura (2012). Federal Policy on Disproportionality in Special Education: Is it Moving us Forward? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(1): 14–25.Google Scholar
Anyon, J. (2005). Radical Possibilities: Public Policy, Urban Education, and a New Social Movement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J. (1998). The Dilemma of Difference: Enriching the Disproportionality Discourse with Theory and Context. Journal of Special Education, 32: 32–36.Google Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J. (2003). Special Education's Changing Identity: Paradoxes and Dilemmas in Views of Culture and Space. Harvard Educational Review, 73: 164–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J. (2011). Toward an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Educational Equity and Difference: The Case of the Racialization of Ability. Educational Researcher, 40: 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J., Kozleski, Elizabeth, Trent, Stanley, Osher, David, and Ortiz, Alba (2010). Justifying and Explaining Disproportionality, 1968–2008: A Critique of Underlying Views of Culture. Exceptional Children, 76: 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J., Rueda, Robert, Salazar, Jesus, and Higareda, Ignacio (2005). Within-group Diversity in Minority Disproportionate Representation: English Language Learners in Urban School Districts. Exceptional Children, 71: 283–300.Google Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J., Trent, Stanley C., and Kuan, Li-Ann (1997). Learning Disabilities Research on Ethnic Minority Students: An Analysis of 22 Years of Studies Published in Selected Refereed Journals. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12: 82–91.Google Scholar
Artiles, Alfredo J., Waitoller, F., and Neal, R. (2011). Grappling with the Intersection of Language and Ability Differences: Equity Issues for Chicano/Latino Students in Special Education. In Valencia, Richard (Ed.), Chicano School Failure and Success: Past, Present, and Future (3rd ed.), pp. 213–234. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
Baker, Bernadette (2002). The Hunt for Disability: The New Eugenics and the Normalization of School Children. Teachers College Record, 104: 663–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynton, Douglas C. (2001). Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History. In Longmore, Paul K. and Umansky, Lauri (Eds.), The New Disability History: American Perspectives, pp. 33–57. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Chris (Ed.) (2011). Blackness and Disability: Critical Examinations and Cultural Interventions. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchett, Wanda (2006). Disproportionate Representation of African American Students in Special Education: Acknowledging the Role of White Privilege and Racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolaki, Stella (2011). Challenging Invisibility, Making Connections: Illness, Survival, and Black Struggles in Audre Lorde's Work. In Bell, Chris (Ed.), Blackness and Disability: Critical Examinations and Cultural Interventions, pp. 47–74. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy (1999). The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia H. (2003). Some Group Matters: Intersectionality, Situated Standpoints, and Black Feminist Thought. In Lott, T. L. and Pittman, J. P. (Eds.), A Companion to African-American Philosophy, pp. 205–229. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Connor, David and Ferri, Beth (2005). Integration and Inclusion—A Troubling Nexus: Race, Disability, and Special Education. The Journal of African American History, 90(1-2): 107–127.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140: 139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, & Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241–1299.Google Scholar
Crossley, Mary (1999). The Disability Kaleidoscope. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(3): 621–716.Google Scholar
Danforth, Scott, Taff, Steve, and Ferguson, Phil (2006). Place, Profession, and Program. In Brantlinger, Ellen (Ed.), Who Benefits from Special Education? Remediating (Fixing) Other People's Children, pp. 1–26. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard (2011). Foreword. In Bell, Chris (Ed.), Blackness and Disability: Critical Examinations and Cultural Interventions, pp. viii–xi. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay (2011). Disabled Upon Arrival: The Rhetorical Construction of Disability and Race at Ellis Island. Cultural Critique, 77: 24–69.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. and Munger, Frank W. (2003). Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erevelles, Nirmala and Minear, Andrea (2010). Unspeakable Offenses: Untangling Race and Disability in Discourses of Intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland-Thomson, Rosemary (1997). Feminist Theory, the Body, and the Disabled Figure. In Davis, Lennard (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader, pp. 279–292. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633.Google Scholar
Hammonds, Evelynn (1994). Black (W)holes and the Geometry of Black Female Sexuality. Differences, 6(2-3): 126–145.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie (2007). When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5: 63–79.Google Scholar
Harris, Cheryl (2001). Equal Treatment and the Reproduction of Inequality. Fordham Law Review, 69: 1753–1783.Google Scholar
Harry, Beth and Klingner, Jeanette (2006). Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education? Understanding Race and Disability in Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Hibel, Jacob, Farkas, George, and Morgan, Paul (2010). Who Is Placed into Special Education? Sociology of Education, 83: 312–332.Google Scholar
Hosp, John L. and Reschly, Daniel J. (2003). Referral Rates for Intervention or Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of Racial Differences. Journal of Special Education, 37: 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Simi (1998). Claiming Disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Losen, Daniel J. and Orfield, Gary (2002). Racial Inequities in Special Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Donald and Reschly, Daniel J. (1998). Overrepresentation of Minority Students: The Case for Greater Specificity or Reconsideration of the Variables Examined. Journal of Special Education, 32: 15–24.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30(3): 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Zach and Skrtic, Thomas M. (2010). Intersectional Needs Politics: A Policy Frame for the Wicked Problem of Disproportionality. Multiple Voices, 11(2): 3–23.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ned (2011). Sexual, Ethnic, Disabled, and National Identities in the “Borderlands” of Lation/a America and African America. In Bell, Chris (Ed.), Blackness and Disability: Critical Examinations and Cultural Interventions, pp. 113–126. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael (1996). Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Oswald, Donald P., Coutinho, Martha J., Best, A. M., and Singh, N. N. (1999). Ethnic Representation in Special Education: The Influence of School-Related Economic and Demographic Variables. Journal of Special Education, 32: 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, James M. (1998). The Disproportionate Representation of African Americans in Special Education: Looking Behind the Curtain for Understanding and Solutions. Journal of Special Education, 32(1): 25–31.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth (2012). When You Have a Hammer … : The Misuse of Statistical Races. Du Bois Review, 9: 281–301.Google Scholar
Ribet, Beth (2010). Surfacing Disability through a Critical Race Theoretical Paradigm. Georgetown Law, 2(2): 209–252.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Schillmeier, Michael (2010). Rethinking Disability: Bodies, Senses, and Things. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Daryl M. (2007). Contempt & Pity: Social Policy and the Image of the Damaged Black Psyche, 1889–1996. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin (2008). Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Skiba, Russell J., Poloni-Staudinger, L., Simmons, A. B., Feggins, L. R., and Chung, C. G. (2005). Unproven Links: Can Poverty Explain Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education? Journal of Special Education, 39: 130–144.Google Scholar
Skiba, Russell J., Simmons, A. B., Ritter, S., Gibb, A. C., Rausch, M. K., and Cuadrado, J. (2008). Achieving Equity in Special Education: History, Status, and Current Challenges. Exceptional Children, 74: 264–288.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education (2006). 26th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2004. Washington, DC: Westat.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education (2009). Children with Disabilities Receiving Special Education under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis Systems, OMB No. 1820–0043). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Valencia, Richard (2010). Dismantling Contemporary Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waitoller, Federico, Artiles, Alfredo J., and Cheney, Douglas (2010). The Miner's Canary: A Review of Overrepresentation Research and Explanations. Journal of Special Education, 44: 29–49.Google Scholar
Watermeyer, Brian (2013). Towards a Contextual Psychology of Disablism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar