Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:24:53.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIVERGENT STREAMS

Race-Gender Achievement Gaps at Selective Colleges and Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2010

Douglas S. Massey  and
LiErin Probasco
Douglas S. Massey*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Princeton University
LiErin Probasco
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Princeton University
*
Professor Douglas S. Massey, Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we extend previous research on racial performance gaps at twenty-eight selective U.S. colleges and universities by examining differences in grade achievement and graduate rates across race-gender categories. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Freshmen (NLSF), we show that Black males, Black females, and Hispanic males attain significantly lower grades than other race-gender groups, and that Black males are thirty-five percent less likely to graduate on-time than other race-gender groups. Analyses consider an array of personal and institutional indicators of academic performance. Grades and graduation rates are improved by academic preparation (particularly high school grade point average), scholarly effort, and, for graduation rates, membership in career-oriented or majority-White campus groups. Grade performance and graduation rates are undermined by a hostile racial climate on campus, family stress, and stereotype threat, all of which disproportionately affect minority students. We conclude with recommendations to college administrators for ways of selecting and supporting minority students to reduce differentials in academic achievement across race-gender groups.

Type
State of the Art
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 219 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Terry H. (2004). The Pursuit of Fairness: A History of Affirmative Action. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Joshua, Quinn, Diane M., and Spencer, Steven J. (1998). Stereotype Threat and the Academic Under-Performance of Minorities and Women. In Swim, Janet K. and Stangor, Charles (Eds.), Prejudice: The Target's Perspective, pp. 83–103. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, William G. and Bok, Derek (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, William G., Chigos, Matthew M., and McPherson, Michael S. (2009). Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America's Public Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Camille Z., Fischer, Mary J., Mooney, Margarita, and Massey, Douglas S. (2009). Taming the River: Negotiating the Academic, Financial, and Social Currents in America's Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crocker, Jennifer and Major, Brenda (1989). Social Stigma and Self-Esteem: The Self-Protective Properties of Stigma. Psychological Review, 96(4): 608–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Signithia and Ogbu, John U. (1986). Black Students'School Success: Coping with the ‘Burden of Acting White.’ The Urban Review, 18(3): 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. H. and Rahe, R. H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2): 213–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellough, J. Edward (2006). Understanding Affirmative Action: Politics, Discrimination, and the Search for Justice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., Charles, Camille Z., Lundy, Garvey F., and Fischer, Mary J. (2003). The Source of the River: The Social Origins of Freshmen at America's Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. and Fischer, Mary J. (2005). Stereotype Threat and Academic Performance: New Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Freshmen. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 2(1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. and Mooney, Margarita (2007). The Effects of America's Three Affirmative Action Programs on Academic Performance. Social Problems, 54(1): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennell, Hazel (2003). Underachievement in Schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Morris and Simmons, Roberta G. (1971). Black and White Self-Esteem: The Urban School Child. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, Steeh, Charlotte, Bobo, Lawrence, and Krysan, Maria (1998). Racial Attitudes in American: Trends and Interpretations, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steele, Claude M. (1997). A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. American Psychologist, 52(6): 613–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, Claude M. and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinto, Vincent (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Marvin E., Figlio, Robert M., Tracy, Paul E., and Singer, Simon I. (1985). The National Survey of Crime Severity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Yu, Julie and Cooper, Harris (1983). A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1): 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar