Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:47:01.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DID BROWN FAIL?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2011

Thomas F. Pettigrew
Thomas F. Pettigrew*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
*
Professor Thomas F. Pettigrew, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, 273 Social Sciences 2, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 2004, the United States elaborately “celebrated” the fiftieth anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. The country's mass media acclaimed May 17 as the date of a great national achievement while paying scant attention to the present racial scene in education. Yet those who believed in and fought for the racial desegregation of the nation's public schools found the widespread “celebration” grossly overstated and at best premature. With effective opposition to school desegregation unrelenting during the entire past half century, with the U.S. Supreme Court continually narrowing Brown's scope, and with African American and Hispanic American children still largely attending segregated schools, the nation's unmitigated self-congratulatory stance seemed unwarranted.

Type
State of the Discourse
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Fall 2011 , pp. 511 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aistrup, J. A. (1996). The Southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in The South. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Clotfelter, C. T. (2004). After Brown: The Rise and Retreat of School Desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. and Gulliver, H. (1971). The Southern Strategy. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (2004). Justice Deferred: A Half Century after Brown v. Board of Education. American Psychologist, 59(6): 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary Transfer Effect of Contact: Do Intergroup Contact Effects Spread to Non-Contacted Outgroups? Social Psychology, 40(2): 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. and Tropp, L. R. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5): 751–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, T. F. and Tropp, L. R. (2008). How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6): 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. and Tropp, L. R. (2011). When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W. (1997). School Desegregation Forty Years after Brown V. Board Of Education: Looking Forward and Looking Back. In Johnson, D. (Ed.), Minorities and Girls in School: Effects on Achievement and Performance, pp. 1–36. Leaders in Psychology Series, vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Psaltis, C., Schmid, K., Popan, J. R., Cairns, E., and Hughes, J. (2010). Secondary Transfer Effects of Intergroup Contact: Alternative Accounts and Underlying Processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tropp, L. R., Smith, A. E., and Crosby, F. J. (2007). The Use of Research in the Seattle and Jefferson County Desegregation Cases: Connecting Social Science and the Law. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1): 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar