Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T20:52:36.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation and Revision of the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI) by a Pilot Study in the City University of New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2022

Tara N. Heagele Open the ORCID record for Tara N. Heagele [Opens in a new window] ,
Lavonne M. Adams ,
Charleen C. McNeill Open the ORCID record for Charleen C. McNeill [Opens in a new window]  and
Danita M. Alfred
Tara N. Heagele*
Affiliation:
Hunter College School of Nursing, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
Lavonne M. Adams
Affiliation:
Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Charleen C. McNeill
Affiliation:
Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Danita M. Alfred
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
*
Corresponding author: Tara N. Heagele, Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to pilot test the Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument (HEPI) with a diverse sample, allowing for assessment of reliability and validity of the instrument. The HEPI is an international, all-hazards questionnaire created to measure disaster preparedness of households, which results in data that can be used to enhance health promotion/disease prevention for individuals and promote resilience for communities.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study of faculty, staff, and students (N = 284) was completed to perform factor analysis to establish the HEPI’s construct validity and compare preparedness across groups.

Results:

The factor analysis revealed 2 dimensions of general preparedness, explaining 35% of the sample variance (Cronbach’s α = 0.89): preparedness actions and planning (α = 0.86) and disaster supplies and resources (α = 0.80). This factor analysis resulted in the revision of the subscaling of HEPI questions. Consistent with previous studies, faculty/staff, older age, higher income, and those with previous disaster experience were more prepared. The mean score was 15.28 out of 40 points.

Conclusions:

The HEPI is easy to administer and explains an acceptable amount of variance. The reliability was strong in this assessment, particularly for a pilot test. Construct, criterion, face, and content validity support the adequacy of the HEPI to capture essentials of household emergency preparedness.

Keywords

disaster planningdisastersemergency preparednessquestionnairessurveys
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023 , e126
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change website. Published March 12, 2020. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heagele, TN. Lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of disaster supply kits. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(6):979-982. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303148 Google Scholar
McNeill, CC, Alfred, D, Mastel-Smith, B, et al. Changes in self-reported household preparedness levels among a rural population after exposure to emergency preparedness media campaign materials. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2016;13(1):1-23.Google Scholar
Clay, LA, Goetschius, JB, Papas, MA, et al. Does preparedness matter? The influence of household preparedness on disaster outcomes during superstorm sandy. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(1):71-79. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.78 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbens, S. Hurricane Katrina explained: Hurricane Katrina was the costliest storm in the U.S. history, and its effects are still felt today in New Orleans and coastal Louisiana. National Geographic website. Published January 16, 2019. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/natural-disasters/reference/hurricane-katrina/ Google Scholar
Benimoff, AI, Fritz, WJ, Kress, M. Superstorm Sandy and Staten Island: learning from the past, preparing for the future. In: Bennington JB, Farmer EC, eds. Learning from the Impacts of Superstorm Sandy. Elsevier Inc; 2015:21-41.Google Scholar
Pasch, RJ, Penny, AB, Berg, R. National hurricane center tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Maria (AL 152017). United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. Published February 14, 2019. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL152017_Maria.pdf Google Scholar
National Weather Service. Historical Hurricane Florence, September 12-15, 2018. United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. Published September 29, 2018. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.weather.gov/mhx/Florence2018 Google Scholar
Heagele, TN, McNeill, CC, Adams, LM, et al. Household emergency preparedness instrument development: a Delphi study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;1-13. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.292 Google Scholar
NYC Emergency Management. Hazard mitigation. NYC Hazard Mitigation website. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://nychazardmitigation.com Google Scholar
Martins, VN, Louis-Charles, H, Nigg, J, et al. Household disaster preparedness in New York City before Superstorm Sandy: findings and recommendations. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2018;15(4):1-19. doi: 10.1515/jhsem-2017-0002 Google Scholar
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. North Help Coalition. The Mount Sinai Hospital website. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.mountsinai.org/locations/mount-sinai/support-services/north-help Google Scholar
City of New York. NYC emergency management: programs and initiatives. NYC Emergency Management website. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/em/index.page Google Scholar
East Harlem COAD. Community organizations active in disasters: prepare, respond, recover. East Harlem COAD website. Accessed October 20, 2019. https://www.eastharlemcoad.org Google Scholar
New York State Citizen Preparedness Corps. New York State website. https://dmna.ny.gov/cpc/. Accessed March 12, 2022.Google Scholar
Abedin, A, Shaw, R. The role of university networks in disaster risk reduction: perspective from coastal Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015;13:381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, JM, Basiaga, M, Olympia, RP. Compliance of colleges and universities in the United States with nationally published guidelines for emergency and disaster preparedness. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30(5):319-326. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000121 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fifolt, M, Burrowes, J, McPherson, T, et al. Strengthening emergency preparedness in higher education through hazard vulnerability analysis. Coll Univ. 2016;91(4):61-70.Google Scholar
Friesen, K, Bell, D. Risk reduction and emergency preparedness activities of Canadian universities. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2006;24(2):223-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J, Shirm, S, Liggin, R, et al. Mass-casualty events at schools: a national preparedness survey. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):e8-e15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapucu, N, Khosa, S. Disaster resiliency and culture of preparedness for university and college campuses. Adm Soc. 2013;45(1):3-37. doi: 10.1177/0095399712471626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincioni, F, Fraboni, R. A baseline assessment of emergency planning and preparedness in Italian universities. Disasters. 2012;36(2):291-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01259.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafer, JA, Heiple, E, Giblin, MJ, et al. Critical incident preparedness and response on post-secondary campuses. J Crim Justice. 2010;38(3):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, M. Aligning institutions of higher education emergency preparedness plans with the national response framework. J Emerg Manag. 2012;10(4):241-251. doi: 10.5055/jem.2012.0102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campus Safety and Security Project. Results of the National Campus Safety and Security Project Survey. EDUCAUSE website. Published July 17, 2009. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://theoxfordconclave.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CSSPSurveyResults.pdf Google Scholar
Claborn, DM. Emergency preparedness of individual students at a large state university in Missouri. J Inst Justice Int Studies. 2010;10:33-43.Google Scholar
Simms, JL, Kusenbach, M, Tobin, GA. Equally unprepared: assessing the Hurricane vulnerability of undergraduate students. Weather Clim Soc. 2013;5:233-243. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00056.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, A, Doberstein, B. Emergency preparedness amongst university students. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015;13(2015):409-413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.0 07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkachuck, MA, Schulenberg, SE, Lair, EC. Natural disaster preparedness in college students: implications for institutions of higher learning. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(4):269-279. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431897 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CUNY-IBM Watson Social Impact Challenge website. Brief information about CUNY. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/marxesocialimpact/brief-information-about-cuny/ Google Scholar
CUNY Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Total enrollment by race/ethnicity and college: percentages fall 2019. Published April 11, 2020. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.cuny.edu/irdatabook/rpts2_AY_current/ENRL_0015_RACE_TOT_PCT.rpt.pdf Google Scholar
CUNY Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Undergraduate enrollment by age and college: percentages fall 2019. Published April 21, 2020. Accessed February 23, 2021. http://www.cuny.edu/irdatabook/rpts2_AY_current/ENRL_0046_AGE_TOT_PCT.rpt.pdf Google Scholar
Torres, A. The City University of New York Office of Recruitment and Diversity annual report 2016-2017. CUNY, The City University of New York website. Published August 15, 2017. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www2.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/about/administration/offices/hr/diversity-and-recruitment/ORDAnnualReport2017.pdf Google Scholar
Waltz, CF, Strikland, OL, Lenz, ER. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. Springer Publishing Company; 2010.Google Scholar
Ramirez, M, Ford, ME, Stewart, AL, et al. Measurement issues in health disparities research. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(5):1640-1657. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00450.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):499-510. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streubert, H, Carpenter, D. Qualitative Research in Nursing. 5th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
DeVellis, RF. Scale Development: Theory and Application. 3rd ed. Sage Publications Inc; 2011.Google Scholar
Devon, HA, Block, ME, Moyle-Wright, P, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzo-Seva, U, Ferrando, PJ. Not positive definite correlation matrices in exploratory item factor analysis: causes, consequences and a proposed solution. Struc Equ Modeling. 2021;28(1):138-147. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2020.1735393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmin, NP. Historical disaster exposure and household preparedness across the United States. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;15(1)58-64. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.123 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, RW, Kiernan, S, Spannhake, EW, et al. Evaluating perceived emergency preparedness and household preparedness behaviours: results from a CASPER survey in Fairfax, Virginia. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(2):222-228. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.48 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, SA, Singer, D, Solway, E, et al. Predictors of emergency preparedness among older adults in the United States. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;15(5):624-630. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.80 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cong, Z, Liang, D, Luo, J. Which household emergency plans are more helpful in tornadoes? Through the lens of gerontology. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020:1-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.194 Google ScholarPubMed
McNeill, CC, Killian, TS, Moon, Z, et al. The relationship between perceptions of emergency preparedness, disaster experience, health-care provider education, and emergency preparedness levels. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2018;38(4):233-243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killian, TS, Moon, ZK, McNeill, C, et al. Emergency preparedness of persons over 50 years old: Further results from the health and retirement study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(1):80-89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FEMA. Declared disasters: New York. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.fema.gov/disasters/disaster-declarations?field_dv2_state_territory_tribal_value=NY&field_year_value=All&field_dv2_declaration_type_value=All&field_dv2_incident_type_target_id_selective=All&page=4.Google Scholar
Onuma, H, Shin, KJ, Managi, S. Household preparedness for natural disasters: impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;21:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004 Google Scholar
Han, Z, Wang, L, Cui, K. Trust in stakeholders and social support: risk perception and preparedness by the Wenchuan earthquake survivors. Environ Hazards. 2020;20(2):132-145. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar