Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-rdph2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-30T14:23:55.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy at Montefiore Medical Center: Implications for Public Health Preparedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2025

Jared Shapiro*
Affiliation:
New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
Adam Block
Affiliation:
New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
David Markenson
Affiliation:
New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
*
Corresponding author: Jared Shapiro; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

Vaccine hesitancy among health care workers poses significant challenges to public health, particularly during times of crisis. This study investigates the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy among health care workers at Montefiore Medical Center, NY, with the aim of providing valuable insights to help shape and enhance future public health vaccination campaigns.

Methods

Utilizing Montefiore’s HER (Epic system) data from 2021–2023, linear logistic and multiple regression analyses were performed to assess correlations between demographic variables—such as age, race/ethnicity, job category, and county of residence—and vaccine uptake for both influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Data were sourced from EPIC and Cority employee datasets. Missing demographic data were imputed where possible. The study population comprises a diverse workforce of 21 331 health care workers, encompassing a wide range of clinical and non-clinical roles.

Results

Key predictors of vaccine hesitancy included prior influenza vaccination status, age, race/ethnicity, job title, and county of residence. Workers vaccinated against influenza were 6.2% more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Younger health care workers and racial groups like Black and biracial employees demonstrated higher levels of hesitancy, while Asian workers exhibited higher rates of vaccine acceptance.

Conclusions

Tailored communication strategies and educational programs are critical for addressing vaccine hesitancy, particularly among younger health care workers and specific racial groups. Building trust and improving transparency will be essential to increasing vaccine uptake and achieving broader public health objectives.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019. Accessed March 2023 https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019Google Scholar
Beleche, T, Ruhter, J, Kolbe, A, et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: demographic factors, geographic patterns, and changes over time. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(2):123135.Google Scholar
Larson, HJ, Clarke, RM, Jarrett, C, et al. Measuring trust in vaccination: a systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(1):18.Google Scholar
Brandt, AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Cent Rep. 1978;8(6):2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grochowska, M, et al. The impact of prior vaccination behavior on future vaccine uptake. Vaccine. 2021;39(3):456463.Google Scholar
Fine, P, Eames, K, Heymann, DL. “Herd immunity”: a rough guide. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(7):911916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truong, J, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021;8(5):18.Google Scholar
Paterson, P, et al. Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):67006706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, DE, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines. 2022;10(1):75.Google Scholar
Washington, HA. Medical Apartheid. Doubleday; 2006.Google Scholar
Kizzmekia, C, et al. Addressing vaccine trust. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):471473.Google Scholar