Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:25:38.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Testing of the Environmental Distress Scale With Indonesian Survivors of a Volcanic Eruption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2014

Sri Warsini ,
Petra Buettner ,
Jane Mills ,
Caryn West  and
Kim Usher
Sri Warsini*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, Australia
Petra Buettner
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Science, Townsville, Australia
Jane Mills
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, Australia
Caryn West
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, Australia
Kim Usher
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, Australia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Sri Warsini, MMed, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns Queensland 4870 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The Mt Merapi volcanic eruption in October 2010 claimed more than 386 lives, injured thousands of survivors, and devastated the surrounding environment. No instrument was available in Indonesia to assess the psychosocial impact on survivors of environmental degradation caused by such natural disasters. We developed, translated, and tested an Indonesian version of the Environmental Distress Scale (EDS) for use as a tool to reliably measure environmental distress related to environmental damage in Indonesia.

Method

The EDS, a prospective translation and psychometric study, was modified for use in a volcano disaster setting in Indonesia; translated into Indonesian; and pilot tested to determine meaning and cultural appropriateness. A test-retest study with 80 survivors of the 2010 Mt Merapi volcanic eruption measured the reliability of the tool.

Results

The Indonesian version of the EDS (I-EDS) captured the content of the original EDS with appropriate adaptations for cultural differences of Indonesian natural disaster survivors.

Conclusions

The I-EDS can be considered a reliable tool for assessing the psychosocial impact of environmental degradation from natural disasters such as volcanic eruptions, which might be useful for Indonesian researchers. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2014;0:1–10)

Keywords

distressdisastersenvironmental impactinstrument developmentpsychometrics
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
© 2014 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Simpson, DM, Wissbecker, I, Sephton, SE. Extreme weather-related events: implications for mental health and well-being. In: Weissbecker I, ed. Climate Change and Human Well-Being: Global Challenges and Opportunities. New York, New York: Springer; 2011:57-78.Google Scholar
2.Hort, M, Vöge, M, Seyfried, R, Ratdomopurbo, A. In situ observation of dome instabilities at Merapi volcano, Indonesia: a new tool for volcanic hazard mitigation. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2006;153:301-312.Google Scholar
3.Sagala, SAH. System Analysis of Social Resilience Againts Volcanic Risks: Case Studies of Mt Merapi, Indonesia, and Sakurajima, Japan [doctoral thesis]. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; August 2009.Google Scholar
4.Surono, JP, Pallister, J, Boichu, M, et al. The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano: a ‘100-year’ event. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2012;241:1-62.Google Scholar
5.Wartatmo, H. Disaster task force’s management support at emergency response phase in the Merapi eruption November 2010. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;26(suppl 1):S86.Google Scholar
6.Feldman, JN, Tilling, RI. Volcanic eruptions, hazards, and mitigation: volcano hazards. In: Auerbach PS, ed. Wilderness Medicine, 6th ed.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Mosby Elsevier; 2011; chap 15.Google Scholar
7.Witham, CS. Volcanic disasters and incidents: a new database. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2005;148:191-233.Google Scholar
8.Connor, L, Albrecht, G, Higginbotham, N, Freeman, S, Smith, W. Environmental change and human health in Upper Hunter communities of New South Wales, Australia. EcoHealth. 2004;1(suppl 2):47-58.Google Scholar
9.Higginbotham, N, Connor, L, Albrecht, G, Freeman, S, Agho, K. Validation of an Environmental Distress Scale. EcoHealth. 2007;3:245-254.Google Scholar
10.Sartore, G-M, Kelly, B, Stain, H, Albrecht, G, Higginbotham, N. Control, uncertainty, and expectations for the future: a qualitative study of the impact of drought on a rural Australian community. Rural Remote Health. 2008;8(950):1-14.Google Scholar
11.Albrecht, G. ‘Solastalgia’: a new concept in health and identity. Philosophy Activism Nature. 2005;3:41-55.Google Scholar
12.Albrecht, G, Sartore, G-M, Connor, L, et al. Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15(suppl 1):S95-S98.Google Scholar
13.Barton, D. Disaster in relation to attachment, to community, and to place: the Marysville experience. Melbourne, Austalia: School of Management Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University; 2013.Google Scholar
14.Maneesriwongul, W, Dixon, JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175-186.Google Scholar
15.Jones, PS, Lee, JW, Phillips, LR, Zhang, XE, Jaceldo, KB. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50(5):300-304.Google Scholar
16.Brislin, RW, Lonner, WJ, Thorndike, RM. Cross-cultural research methods. In: Holt RT, Turner JE, eds. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1973.Google Scholar
17.Sousa, VD, Rojjanasrirat, W. Translation adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Prac. 2010;17:268-274.Google Scholar
18.Nunnaly, JC, Bernstein, IH. Psychometric Theory. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.Google Scholar
19.Schofield, M, ed. Sampling in Quantitative Research, 2nd ed.French Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Education; 2003.Google Scholar
20.Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for asssessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307-310.Google Scholar
21.Cattell, RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245-276.Google Scholar
22.Albrecht, GA. Soliphilia: the antidote to solastalgia. healthearth.blogspot.com; February 19, 2009. http://healthearth.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=3.Google Scholar
23.Albrecht, GA. Creating a language for our psychoterratic emotions and feelings. healthearth.blogspot.com; September 8, 2011. http://healthearth.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=10.Google Scholar