Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:17:00.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sources of Information During the 2014 West Virginia Water Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Elena Savoia ,
Leesa Lin  and
Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Elena Savoia*
Affiliation:
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics/Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation and Practice (EPREP) Center, Division of Policy Translation and Leadership Development, Boston, Massachusetts
Leesa Lin
Affiliation:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), McGraw-Patterson Center for Population Sciences/Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Division of Policy Translation and Leadership Development, Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation and Practice (EPREP) Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Affiliation:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), McGraw-Patterson Center for Population Sciences/Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Elena Savoia, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics/Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation and Practice (EPREP) Center, Division of Policy Translation and Leadership Development, 677 Huntington Avenue, Landmark Center, 3rd Floor East, Boston, MA 02115 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

On January 9, 2014, a faulty storage tank leaked 10,000 gallons of an industrial coal-processing liquid into the Elk River in West Virginia, contaminating the drinking water of 9 counties collectively known as the Kanawha Valley. In the context of this event, we explored the relationship between social determinants and (1) the timeliness with which residents learned about the crisis, (2) the source of information, (3) opinions on the source of information, (4) information-seeking behaviors, and (5) knowledge acquired.

Methods

Between February 7 and 26, 2014, we conducted a survey of 690 adult residents of West Virginia. Descriptive statistics and multivariable statistical models were performed.

Results

Information about water contamination spread quickly, with 88% of respondents from the affected counties hearing about the incident on the same day it occurred. Most people received the information from local television news (73%); social media users had 120% increased odds of knowing about the recommended behaviors. People who had a favorable opinion of the source of information demonstrated better knowledge of recommended behaviors.

Conclusions

The use of local television news during a crisis is important for timely dissemination of information. Information exposure across segments of the population differed on the basis of the population’s background characteristics. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:196–206)

Keywords

risk communicationchemical spillcrisisknowledgeinformationemergency
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 196 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ward, K Jr. 300K lack water in southern W.Va. The Charleston Gazette-Mail. http://www.wvgazette.com/News/201401100028. Published January 10, 2014. Accessed February 24, 2015.Google Scholar
2. Lan, J, Hu, M, Gao, C, et al. Toxicity assessment of 4-methyl-1-cyclohexanemethanol and its metabolites in response to a recent chemical spill in West Virginia, USA. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(10):6284-6293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00371.Google Scholar
3. Safety data sheet crude MCHM. http://ws.eastman.com/ProductCatalogApps/PageControllers/MSDS_PC.aspx?Product=71014291. Published 2011. Accessed June 23, 2015.Google Scholar
4. Goodwin, AS. Governor Tomblin declares state of emergency in 9 counties. State of West Virginia Office of the Governor website. http://www.governor.wv.gov/media/pressreleases/2014/Pages/governor-tomblin-declares-state-of-emergency-in-9-counties.aspx. Published January 9, 2014. Accessed June 23, 2015.Google Scholar
5. Savoia, E, Lin, L, Viswanath, K. Communications in public health emergency preparedness: a systematic review of the literature. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013;11(3):170-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2013.0038.Google Scholar
6. Lin, L, Savoia, E, Agboola, F, et al. What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-484.Google Scholar
7. Lin, L, Jung, M, McCloud, RF, et al. Media use and communication inequalities in a public health emergency: a case study of 2009-2010 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(suppl 4):49-60.Google Scholar
8. Ackerson, LK, Viswanath, K. The social context of interpersonal communication and health. J Health Commun. 2009;14(sup1)(suppl 1):5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730902806836.Google Scholar
9. Galarce, EM, Minsky, S, Viswanath, K. Socioeconomic status, demographics, beliefs and A(H1N1) vaccine uptake in the United States. Vaccine. 2011;29(32):5284-5289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Viswanath, K, Ackerson, LK. Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014550.Google Scholar
11. Taylor-Clark, KA, Viswanath, K, Blendon, RJ. Communication inequalities during Public Health disasters: katrina’s wake. Health Commun. 2010;25(3):221-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410231003698895.Google Scholar
12. DiSogra, C, Cobb, C, Chan, E, et al. Calibrating non-probability internet samples with probability samples using early adopter characteristics. Knowledge Networks Joint Statistical Meetings, 2011. http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/docs/JSM-2011-Calibration-Paper_DiSogra.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2015.Google Scholar
13. Galarce, EM, Viswanath, K. Crisis communication: an inequalities perspective on the 2010 Boston water crisis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(4):349-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.62.Google Scholar
14. Viswanath, K, Minsky, S, Ramamurthi, D, et al. Communications under uncertainty: communication behaviors of diverse audiences during the A(H1N1) incidence of spring and summer 2009. Report. Viswanath Lab, Harvard School of Public Health, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. https://goo.gl/z7881A. Published 2009. Accessed January 2015.Google Scholar
15. Savoia, E, Testa, MA, Viswanath, K. Predictors of knowledge of H1N1 infection and transmission in the U.S. population. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-328.Google Scholar
16. Viswanath, K, Ramanadhan, SR, Kontos, EZ. Mass media and population health: a macrosocial view. In Galea S, ed. Macrosocial Determinants of Population Health. New York: Springer; 2007:275-294.Google Scholar
17. Schade, CP, Wright, N, Gupta, R, et al. Self-reported household impacts of large-scale chemical contamination of the public water supply, Charleston, West Virginia, USA. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Savoia, E, Stoto, MA, Gupta, R, et al. Public response to the 2014 chemical spill in West Virginia: knowledge, opinions and behaviours. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2134-2.Google Scholar
19. Cretikos, M, Eastwood, K, Dalton, C, et al. Household disaster preparedness and information sources: rapid cluster survey after a storm in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:195. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Davis, M, Stephenson, N, Flowers, P. Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):912-918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.016.Google Scholar
21. Hilyard, KM, Freimuth, VS, Musa, D, et al. The vagaries of public support for government actions in case of a pandemic. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(12):2294-2301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0474.Google Scholar
22. Horney, JA, Macdonald, PD, Van Willigen, M, et al. Individual actual or perceived property flood risk: did it predict evacuation from Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina, 2003? Risk Anal. 2010;30(3):501-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01341.x.Google Scholar
23. Janssen, AP, Tardif, RR, Landry, SR, et al. “Why tell me now?” The public and healthcare providers weigh in on pandemic influenza messages. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006;12(4):388-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200607000-00013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar