Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:13:02.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separated After a Disaster: Trust and Privacy Issues in Sharing Children’s Personal Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Rachel L. Charney ,
Terri Rebmann ,
Flavio Esposito ,
Kristin Schmid  and
Sarita Chung
Rachel L. Charney*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
Terri Rebmann
Affiliation:
Institute for Biosecurity, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
Flavio Esposito
Affiliation:
Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
Kristin Schmid
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Sarita Chung
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Rachel Charney,1465 S Grand Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63127 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

After disasters, unaccompanied children may present to an emergency department requiring reunification. An effective reunification system depends on the willingness of guardians to utilize it.

Objective:

Assess guardian willingness to share children’s personal information for reunification purposes after a disaster, perceived concerns and beliefs, and trust in reunification agencies.

Methods:

Guardians of children presenting to 2 pediatric emergency departments were approached to participate in a survey-based study. Willingness to share their children’s personal information was scored on a scale of 1 to 19 (1 point per item). Perceived concerns about and importance of sharing information, level of trust in reunification agencies, and guardian demographics were collected. Chi-square was used to compare trust and attitudes/beliefs. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine factors associated with willingness to share information.

Results:

A total of 363 surveys were completed (response rate, 80%). Most guardians (95.6%) were willing to share at least some information (mean, 16 items; range, 1-19). Half were concerned about protection (55.4%) or abuse (52.3%) of their child’s information. Hospitals were trusted more than other reunification agencies (P < .001). Perception of reunification importance was associated with willingness to share (P < .001).

Conclusions:

Guardians are willing to share their children’s information to facilitate reunification after disasters, but have privacy concerns.

Keywords

reunificationdisaster managementunaccompanied minorshospital planning
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 5-6 , December 2019 , pp. 974 - 981
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Nager, AL. Family reunification-concepts and challenges. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2009;10(3):195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cpem.2009.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, MA, Watkins, SM, Brandenburg, KL, et al. Operation Child-ID: reunifying children with their legal guardians after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters. 2007;31(3):277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01009.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, LR, Cormier, LA. Disaster preparedness and families of children with special needs: a geographic comparison. J Community Health. 2013;38(1):106–112. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9587-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, S, Blake, N. Family reunification after disasters. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2014;15(4):334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.cpem.2014.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Family Reunification Following Disasters: A Planning Tool for Health Care Facilities. https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/AAP-Reunification-Toolkit.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Lang, A-G, et al. *Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03193146.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. Published 2018. Accessed October 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Weitzman, ER, Kelemen, S, Kaci, L, et al. Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gausche-Hill, M, Ely, M, Schmuhl, P, et al. A national assessment of pediatric readiness of emergency departments. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(6):527–534. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Commission of Children and Disasters. 2010 Report to the President and Congress. https://archive.ahrq.gov/prep/nccdreport/nccdreport.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Blake, N, Stevenson, K. Reunification: keeping families together in crisis. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009;67(suppl):S147–S151. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181af0c13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broughton, DD, Allen, EE, Hannemann, RE, et al. Getting 5000 families back together: reuniting fractured families after a disaster: the role of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(suppl4):S442–S445. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0099 SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, S, Shannon, M. Reuniting children with their families during disasters: a proposed plan for greater success. Am J Disaster Med. 2007;2(3):113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, S, Monteiro, S, Ziniel, SI, et al. Survey of emergency management professionals to assess ideal characteristics of a photographic-based family reunification tool. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(2):156–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, S, Mario Christoudias, C, Darrell, T, et al. A novel image-based tool to reunite children with their families after disasters. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(11):1227–1234. doi: 10.1111/acem.12013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broach, J, Yong, R, Manuell, M, et al. Use of facial recognition software to identify disaster victims with facial injuries. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(5):568–572. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kling, D, Egeland, T, Herrera Piñero, M, et al. Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by “The missing grandchildren of Argentina.” Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;31:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The biggest healthcare data breaches of 2018 (so far). Healthcare IT News website. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/projects/biggest-healthcare-data-breaches-2018-so-far. Accessed October 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Stallings, W. Network Security Essentials: Applications and Standards. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3002867. Accessed October 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Willison, DJ, Steeves, V, Charles, C, et al. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? BMC Med Ethics. 2009;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, O, Reid, S, Smith, L, et al. Review of Public and Professional Attitudes towards Confidentiality of Healthcare Data: Final Report Client General Medical Council Company OPM Title Review of Public and Professional Attitudes towards Confidentiality of Healthcare Data Subtitle Final Report Status Final Classification Restricted External OPM Project Code 10088. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Review_of_Public_and_Professional_attitudes_towards_confidentiality_of_Healthcare_data.pdf_62449249.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed August 28, 2018.Google Scholar