Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:20:15.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response Functions in Disasters: Iran Flash Flood 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Reza Abbaszadeh Dizaji
Affiliation:
Department of Disaster and Emergency Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ali Ardalan
Affiliation:
Department of Disaster and Emergency Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Farin Fatemi*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Health Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Farin Fatemi, Research Center for Health Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objective:

Heavy rain and flash flooding left behind a trail of disaster in the western and south-western provinces of Iran in April 2016. The purpose of this study is to highlight the response functions that should be undertaken when such disasters strike.

Methods:

Secondary data, such as documents, organizational reports, and forms completed during response to the flood visits, were the methods of data collection in this study. Then, collected data were analyzed according to the response functions to disasters.

Results:

The study found that a strong disaster response function was the early warning system, by the Iran Meteorological Organization, announced 1 week before the flood. Weaker functions were the lack of coordination among response organizations and the lack of a safety officer in the Incident Command System structure during the flash flood.

Conclusions:

The list of the disaster response functions identified by this study should aid the decision makers and first responders in facing natural or man-made disasters and enable them to better prepare for response functions in the future disasters.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fatemi, F, Ardalan, A, Moslehi, S. Preparedness functions in disaster: lesson learned from Tehran dust storm 2014. Nat Hazards. 2015;77:177179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardalan, A, Holakouie Naieni, K, Kabir, MJ, et al. Evaluation of Golestan Province’s early warning system for flash floods, Iran, 2006‐7. Int J Biometeorol. 2009;53:247254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRC. Guidelines for assessment in emergencies. Geneva, Switzerland: ICRC; 2008.Google Scholar
Babaei, J, Moslehi, S, Ardalan, A. Rapid health needs assessment experience in 11 August 2012 East Azerbaijan earthquakes: a qualitative study. PLoS Curr. 2014;6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Emergency Management Agency. ICS Glossary. FEMA. Glossary.training.fema.gov/emiweb/is/icsresource/assets/icsglossary.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2016.Google Scholar
Ardalan, A, Moradian, MJ, Saberinia, A, et al. I.R.Iran National Health Disaster and Emergency Response Operations Plan. Tehran: Ministry of Health; 2015.Google Scholar
Ciotton, GR. Ciotton’s Disaster Medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 2015.Google Scholar
Smith, JS, Kuldau, GA. Methods of instruction of the incident command system and related topics at US veterinary schools. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8:505510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PAHO. Information Management and Communication in Emergencies and Disasters. In: Barrantes, SA, Rodriguez, M, eds. Washington, DC: PAHO: 2009.Google Scholar
Deen, S. Pakistan 2010 floods. Policy gaps in disaster preparedness and response. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015;12:341349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cools, J, Innocenti, D, O’Brien, S. Lessons from flood early warning systems. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;58:117122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar