Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:08:16.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns and Predictors of Primary Mental Health Service Use Following Bushfire and Flood Disasters

Part of: Floods collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2015

Lennart Reifels ,
Bridget Bassilios ,
Matthew J. Spittal ,
Kylie King ,
Justine Fletcher  and
Jane Pirkis
Lennart Reifels*
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Bridget Bassilios
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew J. Spittal
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Kylie King
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Justine Fletcher
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Jane Pirkis
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Lennart Reifels, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To examine patterns and predictors of primary mental health care service use following 2 major Australian natural disaster events.

Methods

Utilizing data from a national minimum dataset, descriptive and regression analyses were conducted to identify levels and predictors of the use of the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) program over a 2-year period following 2 major Australian bushfire and flood/cyclone disasters.

Results

The bushfire disaster resulted in significantly greater and more enduring ATAPS service volume, while service delivery for both disasters peaked in the third quarter. Consumers affected by bushfires (IRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.20–1.89), diagnosed with depression (IRR 2.57, 95% CI 1.60-4.14), anxiety (IRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21-3.49), or both disorders (IRR 2.15, 95% CI 1.35-3.42) utilized treatment at higher rates.

Conclusions

The substantial demand for primary mental health care services following major natural disasters can vary in magnitude and trajectory with disaster type. Disaster-specific ATAPS services provide a promising model to cater for this demand in primary care settings. Disaster type and need-based variables as drivers of ATAPS use intensity indicate an equitable level of service use in line with the program intention. Established service usage patterns can assist with estimating capacity requirements in similar disaster circumstances. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:275-282)

Keywords

mental health servicesprimary health caredisastersfloodsfires
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Laugharne, J, Van de Watt, G, Janca, A. After the fire: the mental health consequences of fire disasters. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011;24(1):72-77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Stanke, C, Murray, V, Amlôt, R, et al. The effects of flooding on mental health: outcomes and recommendations from a review of the literature. PLoS Curr. 2012;4: e4f9f1fa9c3cae.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Bonanno, GA, Brewin, CR, Kaniasty, K, et al. Weighing the costs of disaster: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2010;11(1):1-49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Norris, FH, Friedman, MJ, Watson, PJ, et al. 60,000 disaster victims speak: part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001. Psychiatry. 2002;65(3):207-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Parslow, RA, Jorm, AF. Who uses mental health services in Australia? An analysis of data from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000;34(6):997-1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Elhai, JD, Ford, JD. Utilization of mental health services after disasters. In: Neria Y, Galea S, Norris FH, eds. Mental Health and Disasters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009:366-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rodriguez, JJ, Kohn, R. Use of mental health services among disaster survivors. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21(4):370-378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. World Health Organization and World Organization of Family Doctors. Integrating Mental Health Into Primary Care: A Global Perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008.Google Scholar
9. Lima, BR, Santacruz, H, Lozano, J, et al. Planning for health/mental health integration in emergencies. In Lystad M, ed. Mental Health Response to Mass Emergencies: Theory and Practice. New York: Brunner/ Mazel; 1988:371-393.Google Scholar
10. Freedy, JR, Simpson, WM. Disaster-related physical and mental health: a role for the family physician. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(6):841-846.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Redwood-Campbell, L, Abrahams, J. Primary health care and disasters-the current state of the literature: what we know, gaps and next steps. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):184-191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Slade, T, Johnston, A, Teesson, M, et al. The Mental Health of Australians 2. Report on the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Canberra, Australia: Department of Health and Ageing; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hickie, I, Groom, G. Primary care-led mental health service reform: an outline of the Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care initiative. Australas Psychiatry. 2002;10(4):376-382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Pirkis, J, Bassilios, B, Fletcher, J, et al. Clinical improvement after treatment provided through the Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care (BOiMHC) programme: do some patients show greater improvement than others? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(4):289-298.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Reifels, L, Bassilios, B, King, KE, et al. Innovations in primary mental healthcare. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37(3):312-317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Bassilios, B, Reifels, L, Pirkis, J. Enhanced primary mental health services in response to disaster. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(9):868-874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Victorian Bushfire Reconstruction and Recovery Authority. Legacy Report. Melbourne, Australia: State Government of Victoria; 2011.Google Scholar
18. Teague, B, McLeod, R, Pascoe, S. 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission: Final Report. Melbourne, Australia: Parliament of Victoria; 2010.Google Scholar
19. Cameron, PA, Mitra, B, Fitzgerald, M, et al. Black Saturday: The immediate impact of the February 2009 bushfires in Victoria, Australia. Med J Aust. 2009;191(1):11-16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Holmes, C. Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry: Final Report. Brisbane, Australia: The State of Queensland (Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry); 2012.Google Scholar
21. Bassilios, B, Nicholas, A, Reifels, L, et al. Evaluating the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) program: consolidated 10-year report. The University of Melbourne Centre for Mental Health website. https://ataps-mds.com/site/assets/files/1016/ten_year_ataps_report_final_acc.pdf. Published May 2013. Accessed November 24, 2014.Google Scholar
22. Kessler, RC, Andrews, G, Colpe, LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959-976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Norris, FH, Elrod, C. Psychosocial consequences of disaster: a review of past research. In: Norris FH, Galea S, Friedman M, Watson P, eds. Methods for Disaster Mental Health Research. New York: Guilford; 2006:20-44.Google Scholar
24. Mills, KL, McFarlane, AC, Slade, T, et al. Assessing the prevalence of trauma exposure in epidemiological surveys. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(5):407-415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Burgess, PM, Pirkis, JE, Slade, TN, et al. Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(7):615-623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Gavrilovic, JJ, Schutzwohl, M, Fazel, M, et al. Who seeks treatment after a traumatic event and who does not? A review of findings on mental health service utilization. J Trauma Stress. 2005;18(6):595-605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Rosen, CS, Matthieu, MM, Norris, FH. Factors predicting crisis counselor referrals to other crisis counseling, disaster relief, and psychological services: a cross-site analysis of post-Katrina programs. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(3):186-194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Usher, K, Buettner, P, West, C, et al. Preparedness for and impact of tropical cyclone Yasi in North Queensland, Australia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):272-278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Lock, S, Rubin, GJ, Murray, V, et al. Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: a systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011. PLoS Curr. 2012;4: ecurrents.dis.a9b76fed1b2dd5c5bfcfc13c87a2f24f.Google ScholarPubMed
30. Andrews, G, Slade, T, Issakidis, C. Deconstructing current comorbidity: data from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:306-314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Elhai, JD, Patrick, SL, Anderson, S, et al. Gender-and trauma-related predictors of use of mental health treatment services among primary care patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1505-1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Peacock, WG. Cross-national and comparative disaster research. In: Stallings RA, ed. Methods of Disaster Research. Philadelphia: Xlibris; 2002:235-250.Google Scholar
33. Dorn, T, Yzermans, CJ, Kerssens, JJ, et al. Disaster and subsequent healthcare utilization: A longitudinal study among victims, their family members, and control subjects. Med Care. 2006;44(6):581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Goto, T, Wilson, JP, Kahana, B, et al. PTSD, depression and help-seeking patterns following the Miyake Island volcanic eruption. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2002;4(3):157-171.Google ScholarPubMed
35. Clark, DM. Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(4):318-327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Hamblen, JL, Norris, FH, Pietruszkiewicz, S, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for postdisaster distress: a community based treatment program for survivors of Hurricane Katrina. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(3):206-214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Jones, K, Allen, M, Norris, FH, et al. Piloting a new model of crisis counseling: specialized crisis counseling services in Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(3):195-205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Middelmann, MH. ed. Natural Hazards in Australia: Identifying Risk Analysis Requirements. Canberra, Australia: Geoscience Australia; 2007.Google Scholar
39. Rosen, CS, Greene, CJ, Young, HE, et al. Tailoring disaster mental health services to diverse needs: an analysis of 36 crisis counseling projects. Health Soc Work. 2010;35(3):211-220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed