Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:35:53.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Humanitarian Emergencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Richard Garfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability to monitor assistance, define humanitarian needs, and approach equity in the distribution of assistance has lagged behind the world’s growing commitment to responding to humanitarian emergencies. This article highlights relevant data sources to elucidate elements of an operational definition of humanitarian need. New and refined measures are proposed to assist in assessing the level of need among affected populations. An original measure that combines data on conflict and disasters to summarize the cumulative magnitude of 4 types of humanitarian threats is presented. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2007;1:110–116)

Keywords

crisesemergencieshumanitarianmeasurement
Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 110 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Egland J. Briefing by the United Nations Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs to the UN Security Council. May 10, 2005. http://www.africafocus.org/docs05/ege0505.php. Accessed September 22, 2007.Google Scholar
2. Clifford R. Marketing humanitarian crises. Yale Global online magazine. Published February 21, 2006. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=7010. Accessed September 22, 2007.Google Scholar
3.Human Security Centre. The Human Security Report: War and Peace in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
4.Global Humanitarian Assistance 2006. Somerset, UK: Development Initiatives; 2006.Google Scholar
5. United Nations Statistical Division. UN Millenium Development Goals Indicators. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Default.aspx. Accessed October 10, 2007.Google Scholar
6. Macrae J, Harner A. Good humanitarian donorship: a mouse or a lion? Humanitarian Practice Network. Published July 2003 http://www.odihpn.org/report.asp?id=2558. Accessed September 22, 2007.Google Scholar
7. Good Humanitarian Donorship Web site. http://www.goodhumanitariandonorship.org.Google Scholar
8. Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions Web site. http://www.smartindicators.org. Accessed September 22, 2007.Google Scholar
9.http://www.humanitarianreform.org/humanitarianreform/Portals/1/cluster%20approach%20page/clusters%20pages/health%20cluster/HNTS/HNTS%20Doc.pdf. Accessed October 10, 2007.Google Scholar
10.The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency Web site. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/profileguide.html. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
11.Armed Conflict Report. Project Ploughshares Web site. http://www.ploughshares.ca/libraries/ACRText/ACR-TitlePageRev.htm. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
12.Internal Displacement: Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2006. Published April 2007. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre Web site. http://www.internal-displacement.org/8025708F004CFA06/(httpPublications)/6F9D5C47FA0DCCE2C12572BF002B9212?OpenDocument. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
13.World Refugee Survey 2006. US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants Web site. http://www.refugees.org/article.aspx?id=1941&subm=19&ssm=29&area=Investigate. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
14. EM-DAT: The International Disaster Database. Emergency Disasters Data Base. http://www.em-dat.net/disasters/list.php. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
15.Marshall, MG.Third World War: System, Process, and Conflict Dynamics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 1999.Google Scholar
16. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 1968–1993. World Armaments and Disarmament: SIPRI Yearbook. Annual Series. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
17.Murray, SJL, King, G, Lopez, AD, Tomijima, N, Krug, EG.Armed conflict as a public health problem. BMJ. 2002;324:346–349.Google Scholar
18.Coghlan, B, Brennan, RJ, Ngoy, P, Dofara, D.Mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a nationwide survey. Lancet. 2006;367:44–51.Google Scholar
19. Roberts L, Lafta R, Garfield R, Khudhairi J, Burnham G. Mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: a cluster sample survey. Lancet. 364:1857–64.Google Scholar
20.Darfur Crisis: Death Estimates Demonstrate Severity of Crisis, but Their Accuracy and Credibility Could Be Enhanced. GAO-07-24. November 2006. http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d0724high.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2007.Google Scholar
21.Wille, C, Krause, K. Behind the numbers: small arms and conflict deaths. Small Arms Survey 2005: Weapons at War. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005: 228–265.Google Scholar
22.Soleman, N, Chandramohan, D, Shibuya, K.Verbal autopsy: current practices and challenges. Bull WHO. 2006;83:161–256.Google Scholar
23.Spiegel, PB, Salama, P.War and mortality in Kosovo, 1998-99: an epidemiological testimony. Lancet. 2000;355:2204–2209.Google Scholar
24. US Census Bureau. IDB Summary Demographic Data online. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbsum.html; and Norwegian Refugee Council, Internal Displacement Database 2004. http://www.nrc.no/?did=9177807.Google Scholar
25. UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Poverty and Development Division. Enhancing Regional Cooperation in Infrastructure Development Including that Related to Disaster Management, 2006. http://www.unescap.org/publications/detail.asp?id=1148. Accessed September 21, 2007.Google Scholar
26.World Disasters Report: Focus on Neglected Crises. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2003.Google Scholar