Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-w4vgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T09:14:52.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is There a Case for Quarantine? Perspectives from SARS to Ebola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

Donna Barbisch ,
Kristi L Koenig  and
Fuh-Yuan Shih
Donna Barbisch*
Affiliation:
Institute for Global and Regional Readiness, Washington, DC
Kristi L Koenig
Affiliation:
Center for Disaster Medical Sciences and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, California
Fuh-Yuan Shih
Affiliation:
National Department of Emergency Medicine, Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Donna Barbisch, DHA, MPH, Institute for Global and Regional Readiness, 101 E St. SE, Washington, DC 20003 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quarantine has been used for centuries in an effort to prevent the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases. While backed by legal authority, the public and even the health care worker community’s understanding of the term is murky at best and scientific evidence to support the use of quarantine is frequently lacking. The multiple interpretations and references to quarantine, the inconsistent application of public health quarantine laws across jurisdictional boundaries, and reports of ineffectiveness are further complicated by associated infringement of civil liberties and human rights abuses. Given the need to balance public safety with human rights, we must be more precise about the meaning of quarantine and consider the efficacy and negative secondary effects resulting from its implementation. This article explains quarantine terminology and then uses a case study from Taiwan during the 2002–2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak to illustrate the key principles associated with quarantine measures taken during the 2014 Ebola outbreak and the potential hazards that can arise from quarantines. Finally, we provide a quarantine and isolation decision tree to assist policy makers and public health officials in applying medically defensible, outcomes-based data and legal authorities to optimize management of emerging infectious diseases. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:547–553)

Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 547 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Shedev, P. The Origin of Quarantine. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(9):1071-1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barbisch, D, Gostin, LO. Quarantine. Chapter 15. In: Koenig and Schultz’s Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010:203-212.Google Scholar
3. Homeland Security Council. National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: Implementation Plan. http://www.flu.gov/planning-preparedness/federal/pandemic-influenza-implementation.pdf. Published May 2006. Accessed January 1, 2015.Google Scholar
4. Executive Order 12452—Revised list of quarantinable communicable diseases. National Archives website. http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12452.html. Accessed December 28, 2014.Google Scholar
5. Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). Dec. 21, 2001. http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.Google Scholar
6. Drazen, JM, Kanapathipillai, R, Campion, EW, et al. Ebola and Quarantine. Editorial. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2029-2030. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1413139. Accessed November 7, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Barbara, J, et al. Large-scale quarantine following biological terrorism in the United States. Scientific examination, logistic and legal limits, and possible consequences. Special communication. JAMA. 2001;286(21):2711-2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. World Health Organization. International Health Regulations (2005). http://www.who.int/ihr/publications/9789241596664/en/. Accessed January 1, 2015.Google Scholar
9. Gostin, LO. International Infectious Disease Law, revision of the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2623-2627. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=198832. Accessed November 8, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Statement on the 3rd meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee regarding the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2014/ebola-3rd-ihr-meeting/en/. Published October 23, 2014. Accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
11. IDSA Statement on Involuntary Quarantine of Healthcare Workers Returning From Ebola-Affected Countries. IDSA website. http://www.idsociety.org/2014_ebola_quarantine. Accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
12. SHEA Supports Evidence-Based Measures to Prevent Ebola Transmission, Opposes Mandatory Quarantine for Healthcare Personnel. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America website. http://www.shea-online.org/JournalNews/PressRoom/PressView/ArticleId/318/SHEA-Supports-Evidence-Based-Measures-to-Prevent-Ebola-Transmission-Opposes-Mandatory-Quarantine-for.aspx. Published October 26, 2014. Accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
13. Interim U.S. Guidance for Monitoring and Movement of Persons with Potential Ebola Virus Exposure. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/monitoring-and-movement.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
14. State Health Officer Issues Risk-Based Quarantine Order to Provide Consistent Guidelines for Counties. Number 14-089. California Department of Public Health website. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Pages/NR14-089.aspx. Published October 29, 2014. Accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
15. Duffy, C. Ebola volunteers down after quarantine rules imposed. NJTVNews. http://www.njtvonline.org/news/video/groups-blame-ebola-quarantine-for-fewer-volunteers/. Published November 19, 2014. Accessed January 1, 2015.Google Scholar
16. Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en. Accessed October 27, 2014.Google Scholar
17. Twu, S, et al. Control measures for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(6):718-720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Kaji, A, Koenig, KL, Bey, T. Surge capacity for healthcare systems: a conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1157-1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Shih, F, Koenig, KL. Improving surge capacity for biothreats: experience from Taiwan. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(11):1114-1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Hick, JL, Koenig, KL, Barbisch, D, Bey, T. Surge capacity concepts for healthcare facilities: the ‘CO-S-TR’ model for initial incident assessment. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(suppl):51-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Schabas, R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: did quarantine help? Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2004;15(4):204. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2094974. Accessed November 8, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Maunder, H, et al. Long-term psychological and occupational effects of providing hospital healthcare during SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(12):1924-1932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Zeng, G, et al. Infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome during its incubation period. Biomed Environ Sci. 2009;22(6):502-510. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20337224. Accessed November 8, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed