Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:29:36.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indexes of Caring for Elderly in Earthquakes According to the Iranian Experience: A Qualitative Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2018

Hassan Khodadadi ,
Soudabeh Vatankhah  and
Tabandeh Sadeghi
Hassan Khodadadi
Affiliation:
School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Soudabeh Vatankhah*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Medical Information, Health Management, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and Economics Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Tabandeh Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran, and Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Soudabeh Vatankhah, Associate Professor, Department of Health Management, Faculty of Health Management & Information Sciences & Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (email: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The elderly are especially susceptible to death and injury in disasters. This study aimed to identify indexes of caring for elderly people in an earthquake according to the Iranian experience.

Methods

This qualitative study was conducted during 2014–2016 by use of the content analysis technique. Data were collected through individual deep interviews with the elderly and people with experience providing services to the elderly during earthquakes in an urban area of Iran. The data were analyzed by use of the Graneheim and Lundman method.

Results

Seven categories emerged: vulnerability of elderly people, physiological indexes, psychological indexes, economic indexes, religious and spiritual indexes, health indexes, and security indexes. There were 3 uncategorized issues: “There is no specific protocol for the elderly,” “The need to design plans based on age care,” and “Aid organizations.”

Conclusions

Implementing a comprehensive plan would not only save lives but decrease suffering and enable effective use of available resources. Due to the crucial role of the prehospital care system in disasters, there is a need for further investigation based on the results of this study to develop strategies for improving the system. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:493–501)

Keywords

earthquakedisasterelderly
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 493 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ashkenazi, I, Isakovich, B, Kluger, Y, et al. Prehospital management of earthquake casualties buried under rubble. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(02):122-133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00002302.Google Scholar
2. Djalali, A, Khankeh, H, Öhlén, G, et al. Facilitators and obstacles in pre-hospital medical response to earthquakes: a qualitative study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-30.Google Scholar
3. Green, GB, Modi, S, Lunney, K, et al. Generic evaluation methods for disaster drills in developing countries. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(5):689-699. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.147.Google Scholar
4. National Report of the Islamic Republic of Iran on Disaster Education. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. 18-22 January. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. https://www.unisdr.org/2005/mdgs-drr/national-reports/Iran-report.pdf. Access on 2017/04/12.Google Scholar
5. Asef, M. Modelling the elements of country vulnerability to earthquake disasters. Disasters. 2008;32(3):480-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01051.x.Google Scholar
6. Schipper, L, Pelling, M. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters. 2006;30(1):19-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x.Google Scholar
7. World Health Organization. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and WHO Joint Project for:“Reconstruction of Health Services in Bam. Geneva: WHO; 2004.Google Scholar
8. Gautschi, OP, Cadosch, D, Rajan, G, et al. Earthquakes and trauma: review of triage and injury-specific, immediate care. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(02):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005847.Google Scholar
9. Mirhashemi, S, Ghanjal, A, Mohebbi, HA, et al. The 2003 Bam earthquake: overview of first aid and transport of victims. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(06):513-516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005343.Google Scholar
10. Naghi, TM, Kambiz, K, Shahriar, JM, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries associated with earthquake: a report of injuries of Iran’s December 26, 2003 Bam earthquake casualties managed in tertiary referral centers. Injury. 2005;36(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.021.Google Scholar
11. Saghafinia, M, Araghizade, H, Nafissi, N, et al. Treatment management in disaster: a review of the Bam earthquake experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(06):517-521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005355.Google Scholar
12. Abolghasemi, H, Radfar, MH, Khatami, M, et al. International medical response to a natural disaster: lessons learned from the Bam earthquake experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(03):141-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00003599.Google Scholar
13. Motamedi, MHK, Saghafinia, M, Bafarani, AH, et al. A reassessment and review of the Bam earthquake five years onward: what was done wrong? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(05):453-460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00007317.Google Scholar
14. Sengezer, B, Koç, E. A critical analysis of earthquakes and urban planning in Turkey. Disasters. 2005;29(2):171-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00279.x.Google Scholar
15. Hsu, EB, Ma, M, Lin, FY, et al. Emergency medical assistance team response following Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(01):17-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00000066.Google Scholar
16. Gavagan, TF, Smart, K, Palacio, H, et al. Hurricane Katrina: medical response at the Houston Astrodome/Reliant center complex. South Med J. 2006;99(9):933-940. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-200609000-00012.Google Scholar
17. de Ville de Goyet, C, De Goyet, CdV. Health lessons learned from the recent earthquakes and Tsunami in Asia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(01):15-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00004283.Google Scholar
18. Sklar, DP, Richards, M, Shah, M, Roth, P. Responding to disasters: academic medical centers’ responsibilities and opportunities. Acad Med. 2007;82(8):797-800. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180d0986e.Google Scholar
19. Djalali, A, Hosseinijenab, V, Hasani, A, et al. A fundamental, national, medical disaster management plan: an education-based model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(06):565-569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00007524.Google Scholar
20. Emami, MJ, Tavakoli, AR, Alemzadeh, H, et al. Strategies in evaluation and management of Bam earthquake victims. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(05):327-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X0000279X.Google Scholar
21. Ardalan, A, Mazaheri, M, Naieni, KH, et al. Older people’s needs following major disasters: a qualitative study of Iranian elders’ experiences of the Bam earthquake. Ageing Soc. 2010;30(01):11-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09990122.Google Scholar
22. Chan, CLW, Wang, CW, Qu, Z, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among adult survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(3):295-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20645.Google Scholar
23. Fernandez, LS, Byard, D, Lin, C-C, et al. Frail elderly as disaster victims: emergency management strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(02):67-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00000200.Google Scholar
24. Gibson, MJ, Hayunga, M. We can do better: lessons learned for protecting older persons in disasters. AARP Public Policy Institute. https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/better.pdf. Published 2006. Accessed October 4, 2017.Google Scholar
25. Lamb, KV, OʼBrien, C, Fenza, PJ. Elders at risk during disasters. Home Healthc Now. 2008;26(1):30-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NHH.0000305552.32597.4d.Google Scholar
26. Lin, M-R, Huang, W, Huang, C, et al. The impact of the Chi-Chi earthquake on quality of life among elderly survivors in Taiwan–a before and after study. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(4):379-388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015543113448.Google Scholar
27. Tanida, N. What happened to elderly people in the great Hanshin earthquake. BMJ. 1996;313(7065):1133. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7065.1133.Google Scholar
28. World Health Organization. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. Geneva: WHO; 1997.Google Scholar
29. Chou, F-C, Chou, P, Lin, C, et al. The relationship between quality of life and psychiatric impairment for a Taiwanese community post-earthquake. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(6):1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000031337.73269.64.Google Scholar
30. Tsai, K-Y, Chou, P, Chou, FH-C, et al. Three-year follow-up study of the relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms and quality of life among earthquake survivors in Yu-Chi, Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(1):90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.10.004.Google Scholar
31. Wang, X, Gao, L, Zhang, H, et al. Post‐earthquake quality of life and psychological well‐being: longitudinal evaluation in a rural community sample in northern China. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;54(4):427-433. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00732.x.Google Scholar
32. Wu, H-C, Chou, P, Huang-Chih Chou, F, et al. Survey of quality of life and related risk factors for a Taiwanese village population 3 years post-earthquake. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40(4):355-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01802.x.Google Scholar
33. Ceyhan, E, Ceyhan, AA. Earthquake survivors’ quality of life and academic achievement six years after the earthquakes in Marmara, Turkey. Disasters. 2007;31(4):516-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01023.x.Google Scholar
34. McNicoll, G. World population ageing 1950-2050. Popul Dev Rev. 2002;28(4):814-816.Google Scholar
35. Ardalan, A, Holakouie Naieni, K, Aflatounian, M, et al. Experience of a population-based study on needs and health status of affected people in Bam earth Quake. Majallah-i Ipidimiyuluzhi-i Iran. 2005;1(1):33-45.Google Scholar
36. Malterud, K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.Google Scholar
37. Elo, S, Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.Google Scholar
38. Peleg, K, Michaelson, M, Shapira, SC, et al. Principles of emergency management in disasters. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2003;10(2):117-121. https://doi.org/10.1053/jarr.2003.50019.Google Scholar
39. Mohebbi, HA, Mehrvarz, S, Saghafinia, M, et al. Earthquake related injuries: assessment of 854 victims of the 2003 Bam disaster transported to tertiary referral hospitals. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(06):510-515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00006336.Google Scholar
40. Strauss, A, Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
41. Strauss, A, Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
42. Polit, DF, Beck, CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.Google Scholar
43. Iranmanesh, S, Banazadeh, M, Forozy, MA. The relationship between nurses’ perception of barriers magnitude and their demographic characteristics. i-Manager’s Journal on Nursing. 2015;5(1):11-22.Google Scholar
44. Center, IS. Iran Statistical Yearbook of 2011. Tehran, Iran: Statistical Center of Iran; 2011.Google Scholar
45. Hatamizadeh, P, Najafi, I, Vanholder, R, et al. Epidemiologic aspects of the Bam earthquake in Iran: the nephrologic perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(3):428-438. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.019.Google Scholar
46. Talebian, M, Biggs, J, Bolourchi, M, et al. The Dahuiyeh (Zarand) earthquake of 2005 February 22 in central Iran: reactivation of an intramountain reverse fault. Geophys J Int. 2006;164(1):137-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02839.x.Google Scholar
47. Nabavi, SH, Aslani, T, Ghorbani, S, et al. The prevalence of malnutrition and its related factors among the elderly of Bojnourd, 2014. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2015;19(1):32-36.Google Scholar
48. Streubert Speziale, H, Carpenter, D. Qualitative Research in Nursing. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
49. Graneheim, UH, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.Google Scholar
50. Thomas, DSK, Phillips, B, Lovekamp, WE, et al. Social Vulnerability to Disasters. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2013.Google Scholar
51. Armenian, HK, Morikawa, M, Melkonian, AK, et al. Loss as a determinant of PTSD in a cohort of adult survivors of the 1988 earthquake in Armenia: implications for policy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102(1):58-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.102001058.x.Google Scholar
52. Montazeri, A, Baradaran, H, Omidvari, S, et al. Psychological distress among Bam earthquake survivors in Iran: a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2005;5(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-4.Google Scholar
53. Suar, D, Mishra, S, Khuntia, R. Placing age differences in the context of the Orissa supercyclone: who experiences psychological distress? Asian J Soc Psychol. 2007;10(2):117-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00218.x.Google Scholar
54. Peachey, K. Ageism: a factor in the nutritional vulnerability of older people? Disasters. 1999;23(4):350-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00124.Google Scholar
55. Bolin, R, Klenow, DJ. Older people in disaster: a comparison of black and white victims. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1988;26(1):29-43. https://doi.org/10.2190/RHK2-416V-MGXH-HYKL.Google Scholar
56. Ardalan, A, Masoomi, G, Goya, M, et al. Disaster health management: Iran’s progress and challenges. Iran J Public Health. 2009;38(suppl 1):93-97.Google Scholar
57. Altindag, A, Ozen, S, Sir, A. One-year follow-up study of posttraumatic stress disorder among earthquake survivors in Turkey. Compr Psychiatry. 2005;46(5):328-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.01.005.Google Scholar
58. Schröder-Butterfill, E, Marianti, R. A framework for understanding old-age vulnerabilities. Ageing Soc. 2006;26(01):9-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05004423.Google Scholar
59. Sirgy, MJ, Cornwell, T. How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 2002;59(1):79-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016021108513.Google Scholar
60. Bolin, R, Klenow, DJ. Response of the elderly to disaster: an age-stratified analysis. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1983;16(4):283-296. https://doi.org/10.2190/MQEG-YN39-8D5V-WKMP.Google Scholar