Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:11:35.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of Natural Disaster Combined with Nuclear Power Plant Accidents on Local Medical Services: a Case Study of Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2014

Yuko Kodama*
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Tomoyoshi Oikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Kaoru Hayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Michiko Takano
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Mayumi Nagano
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Katsuko Onoda
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan Department of Physical Therapy, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Toshiharu Yoshida
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Akemi Takada
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Tatsuo Hanai
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Shunji Shimada
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Satoko Shimada
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Yasuyuki Nishiuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Syuichi Onoda
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Therapy, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Kazuo Monma
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Professions Division, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
Masaharu Tsubokura
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Tomoko Matsumura
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Masahiro Kami
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Yukio Kanazawa
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Yuko Kodama, RN, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objective

To elucidate the impacts of nuclear plant accidents on neighboring medical centers, we investigated the operations of our hospital within the first 10 days of the Great East Japan Earthquake followed by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.

Methods

Data were extracted from medical records and hospital administrative records covering 11 to 20 March 2011. Factual information on the disaster was obtained from public access media.

Results

A total of 622 outpatients and 241 inpatients were treated. Outpatients included 43 injured, 6 with cardiopulmonary arrest, and 573 with chronic diseases. Among the 241 inpatients, 5 died, 137 were discharged, and the other 99 were transferred to other hospitals. No communication methods or medical or food supplies were available for 4 days after the earthquake. Hospital directors allowed employees to leave the hospital on day 4. All 39 temporary workers were evacuated immediately, and 71 of 239 full-time employees remained. These employees handled extra tasks besides patient care and patient transfer to other hospitals. Committed effective doses indicating the magnitude of health risks due to an intake of radioactive cesium into the human body were found to be minimal according to internal radiation exposure screening carried out from July to August 2011.

Conclusions

After the disaster, hospitals located within the evacuation zone of a 30-km radius of the nuclear power plant were isolated. Maintenance of the health care system in such an event becomes difficult. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2014;8:471-476)

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brumfiel, G, Cyranoski, D. Quake sparks nuclear crisis. Nature. 2011;471(7338):273-275.Google Scholar
2. Yasunari, TJ, Stohl, A, Hayano, BS, et al. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(49).Google Scholar
3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Report of ICRP Task Group 84 on Initial Lessons Learned from the Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Japan vis-a-vis the ICRP System of Radiological Protection. November 22, 2012. http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20TG84%20Summary%20Report.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2014.Google Scholar
4. Dauer, LT, Zanzonico, P, Tuttle, RM, et al. The Japanese tsunami and resulting nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi power facility: technical, radiologic, and response perspectives. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(9):1423-1432.Google Scholar
5. World Health Organization. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. 2013:172. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78218/1/9789241505130_eng.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2014.Google Scholar
6. UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume I. Scientific Annex A. 2014. http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2014.Google Scholar
7. Muramatsu, N, Akiyama, H. Japan: super-aging society preparing for the future. Gerontologist. 2011;51(4):425-432.Google Scholar
8. Minamisoma City Web site. http://www.city.minamisoma.lg.jp/index.cfm/10,15930,c,html/15930/07.pdf. Accessed November, 11, 2014.Google Scholar
9. Bowen, WQ, Cottee, M, Hobbs, C. Multilateral cooperation and the prevention of nuclear terrorism: pragmatism over idealism. International Affairs. 2012;88(2):349-368.Google Scholar
10. Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors. World Nuclear Association Web site. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and-Security/Safety-of-Plants/Safety-of-Nuclear-Power-Reactors/. Updated April 2014. Accessed August 13, 2014.Google Scholar
11. Results of internal exposure inspection by the whole body counter 2014. Fukushima Prefecture Web site. https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/sec/21045b/wbc-kensa-kekka.html. Accessed October 29, 2014.Google Scholar
12. Maxwell, C. Hospital organizational response to the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island: implications for future-oriented disaster planning. Am J Public Health. 1982;77(3):275-279.Google Scholar
13. Scanlon, J, McMahon, T, Haastert, CV. Handling mass death by integrating the management of disasters and pandemics: lessons from the Indian Ocean Tsunami, the Spanish Flu and other incidents. J Contingencies Crisis Management. 2007;15(2):80-94.Google Scholar
14. Japan Red Cross Ishinomaki Hospital Web site. http://www.ishinomaki.jrc.or.jp/img/shinsai01.pdf. September 22, 2011. Accessed April 8, 2013.Google Scholar
15. Katata, G, Terada, H, Nagai, H, et al. Numerical reconstruction of high dose rate zones due to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. J Environ Radioact. 2012;111:2-12.Google Scholar
16. Tsubokura, M, Takita, M, Matsumura, T, et al. Changes in metabolic profiles after the Great East Japan Earthquake: a retrospective observational study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):267.Google Scholar
17. Jacob, P, Meckbach, R.. Shielding factors and external dose evaluation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1987;21(1-3):79-85.Google Scholar