Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:16:55.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital MCI Response Plan Analysis in a Low Resource Country After a Mass Casualty Incident: The Beirut Blast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2024

Mariana Helou
Affiliation:
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Eric S Weinstein
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM – Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid and Global Health, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
Yara Mouawad
Affiliation:
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Danielle Abou Khater
Affiliation:
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) come unannounced, mandating the immediate shift from the daily routine to crisis mode through the implementation of an MCI response plan (plan). On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion devastated the Lebanese capital, Beirut, causing 8643 injuries and 200 deaths.1 The private Lebanese American University Medical Center in Beirut has an an estimated 10,000 emergency department (ED) visits per year. The purpose of this study is to analyse the plan of this private hospital in a low resource country in response to a blast MCI.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the expected outcome of the pre-existing plan was performed.

Results

Major flaws were noted. Triage was impossible using the START method and will be done outside the ED dividing patients into walking and non-walking. Identification and registration of patients was impossible. Patients will be assigned a number and be registered later. Colored jackets were created to recognize response team members for better organization.t Radiologic imaging will be ordered only when they change the patients’ disposition.

Conclusion

This analysis showed failure of the plan at different levels and adjustments were made to advance the plan. Periodic exercises and annual review are needed for continuous improvement.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc
Supplementary material: File

Helou et al. supplementary material

Helou et al. supplementary material
Download Helou et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.6 MB