Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:52:31.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaster Risk Assessment Among Iranian Exceptional Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

Seyedeh Samaneh Miresmaeeli Open the ORCID record for Seyedeh Samaneh Miresmaeeli [Opens in a new window] ,
Nafiseh Esmaeili Open the ORCID record for Nafiseh Esmaeili [Opens in a new window] ,
Sepideh Sadeghi Ashlaghi Open the ORCID record for Sepideh Sadeghi Ashlaghi [Opens in a new window]  and
Zahra Abbasi Dolatabadi Open the ORCID record for Zahra Abbasi Dolatabadi [Opens in a new window]
Seyedeh Samaneh Miresmaeeli
Affiliation:
School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Nafiseh Esmaeili
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sepideh Sadeghi Ashlaghi
Affiliation:
Ziaeeyan Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Zahra Abbasi Dolatabadi*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical-surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Zahra Abbasi Dolatabadi, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Exceptional children, like other children, have the right to be educated in a safe environment. Disasters are considered as serious issues regarding safety and security of educational environments. Following disasters, vulnerable groups, especially children with handicaps and disabilities are more likely to be seriously injured. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the safety and disaster risk assessment of exceptional schools in Tehran, Iran.

Method:

The cross-sectional study was conducted in exceptional schools in Tehran, 2018. First, 55 exceptional schools in all grades were selected based on census sampling method and evaluated by using a checklist designed by Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization (TDMMO) and Ministry of Education in 2015. The data were analyzed using Excel software and statistical descriptive tests.

Result:

Based on the results, school facilities are worn and have unsafe elevators (least safety: 7.69%), yards (least safety: 9.52%), laboratories (least safety: 16.67%), libraries (least safety: 24.24%), fire extinguishing systems (least safety: 28.99%), and storage rooms and kitchens (least safety: 33.33%) which require immediate considerations. In total, the safety of exceptional schools in this study was 70.13%, which suggests medium-risk level.

Conclusion:

The educational settings must be reconsidered, along with identifying the risk and safety at school. In addition, a standard should be established for evaluating safety, especially in exceptional schools.

Keywords

exceptional schooldisasterrisk assessmentIran
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 678 - 682
Copyright
© 2021 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hockenberry, MJ, Wilson, D. Wong’s Nursing Care of Infants and Children-E-Book. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.Google Scholar
Bebbington, J, Unerman, J. Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals: an enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability J. 2018;31(1).10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), 2008. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html. Accessed January 12, 2021.Google Scholar
TEAL Center Staff. TEAL Center Fact Sheet No. 2: Universal Design for Learning, 2010. https://lincs.ed.gov/state-resources/federal-initiatives/teal/guide/udl. Accessed January 10, 2021.Google Scholar
The United Nations Office for Disaster Reduction (UNDRRR). Terminology: basic terms of disaster risk reduction. https://www.undrr.org/terminology. Accessed September 20, 2019.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Relief Web glossary of humanitarian terms. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/reliefweb-glossary-humanitarian-terms-enko. Accessed September 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Bethel, JW, Foreman, AN, Burke, SC. Disaster preparedness among medically vulnerable populations. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(2):139–143.10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, S. Preparing for disaster: protecting the most vulnerable in emergencies. Davis, CA: University of California; 2009;42:1491–1547.Google Scholar
Dyregrov, A, Yule, W, Olff, M. Children and natural disasters. Eur J Psychotruamatol. 2018;9(2):1–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Ranghieri, F, Ishiwatari, M. Learning from Megadisasters Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2014.10.1596/978-1-4648-0153-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). Living with disabilities and disasters - key findings. 2014. https://www.unisdr.org/2014/iddr/documents/2013DisabilitySurveryReport_030714.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Mirzaei, S, Mohammadinia, L. Importance of developing a local instrument of disaster-resilient school. Letter to editor. J Community Health Res. 2019;8(4):194–195.Google Scholar
Mirzaei, S, Dehghani-Tafti, AA, Mohammadinia, L, et al. Operational strategies for establishing disaster-resilient schools: a qualitative study. Adv J Emerg Med. 2020;4(2):e23.Google ScholarPubMed
Haulle, E. Evaluatng earthquake disaster risk management in schools in Rungwe volcanic province in Tanzania. J Disaster Risk Studies. 2012;4(1). doi: 10.4102/jamba.v4i1.44 Google Scholar
Tuswadi, Takehiro H. School-community collaboration in disaster education in a primary school near Merapi volcano in Java Island. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016. doi: 10.1063/1.4947418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirzaei, S, Mohammadinia, L, Nasiriani, K, et al. School resilience components in disasters and emergencies: a systematic review. Trauma Mon. 2019;24(5)1–3.Google Scholar
Jàmbá, MC. The impact of flood disasters on child education in Muzarabani District, Zimbabwe. J Disaster Risk Studies. 2014;6(1):1–8.Google Scholar
Wisner, B, Blaikie, P, Cannon, T, et al. At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. www.preventionweb.net. The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). 2004. Accessed December 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) Partenership. Definition of child with a disability. http://www.ideapartnership.org/. Accessed September 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Peek, L, Stough, LM. Children with disabilities in the context of disaster: a social vulnerability perspective. Child Dev. 2010;81(4):1260–1270.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01466.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boon, HJ, Brown, LH, Tsey, K, et al. School disaster planning for children with disabilities: a critical review of the literature. Int J Spec Educ. 2011;26(3):223–237.Google Scholar
Tormala, ZL, Petty, RE. Contextual contrast and perceived knowledge: exploring the implications for persuasion. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007;17:30–43.Google Scholar
Coppola, DP. Introduction to International Disaster Management. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.Google Scholar
INFORM. INFORM index for disaster risk management. 2020. https://drmkc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inform-index. Accessed November 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education & Ministry of Interior. National project: prepared school. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Education & Ministry of Interior; 2015.Google Scholar
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, the (GFDRR). A Practical Guideline to Making School Safe from Natural Disaster: For School Principals and School Committee. Jakarta, Indonesia: GFDRR; 2014.Google Scholar
Petal, M. Thematic platform for knowledge and education disaster prevention for schools guidance for education sector decision-makers. Geneva: International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), https://www.undrr.org/publication/disaster-prevention-schools-guidance-education-sector-decision-makers. Accessed September 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Safety School Partners. Introduction to the incident command system for schools, IS-100.SCa Course Summary. http://www.schoolsafetypartners.org/resources/webinar/IS100sca_summary. Accessed September 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Fishbane, M, Kist, A, Schieber, RA. Use of the emergency incident command system for school-located mass influenza vaccination clinics. Pediatrics. 2012;129 Suppl 2:S101–S106.10.1542/peds.2011-0737JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, AB, Brock, SE, Reeves, MA. School crisis teams within an incident command system. Calif School Psychol. 2006;11(6):63–72.10.1007/BF03341116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseini, M, Izadkhah, Y. Earthquake disaster risk management planning in schools. Disaster Prev Manag. 2006;15(4):649–661.10.1108/09653560610686595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipler, K, Tarrant, R, Johnston, D, et al. Are you ready? Emergency preparedness in New Zealand schools. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc. 2017;25:324–333.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J, Shirm, S, Liggin, R, et al. Mass-casualty events at schools: a national preparedness survey. Pediatrics. 2016;117(1)8–15.10.1542/peds.2005-0927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sujarwo, Noorhamdani, Fathoni, M. Disaster risk reduction in schools: the relationship of knowledge and attitudes towards preparedness from elementary school students in school-based disaster preparedness in the Mentawai Islands, Indonesia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(6):581–586.Google Scholar
Shah, AA, Ye, J, Pan, L, et al. Schools’ flood emergency preparedness in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2018;9(2):181–194.10.1007/s13753-018-0175-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar