Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:39:09.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Assess the Psychological Competencies for Surviving a Disaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2014

Danjun Feng  and
Linqin Ji
Danjun Feng*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Shandong University, China
Linqin Ji
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Danjun Feng, PhD, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, China (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To find the psychological competencies for surviving a disaster and develop a self-report questionnaire to assess them.

Methods

Interviews with 16 earthquake survivors and 16 fire fighters followed by qualitative analysis were used to find psychological competencies. Formation of the item pool, a pilot study among 20 college teachers and students, a series of principal component analyses for the data from 345 college students, and a confirmatory factor analysis for the data from 307 participants with various occupations were used to develop the Psychological Competencies for Surviving a Disaster Questionnaire (PCSDQ).

Results

We found 4 psychological competencies: risk perception of a disaster, disaster knowledge and self-relief skills, low fear in a disaster, and sense of control over a disaster. The 24-item PCSDQ assessed these psychological competencies. The Cronbach alpha of PCSDQ subscales ranged from .75 to .87.

Conclusions

The psychological competencies for surviving a disaster were found to be risk perception of a disaster, disaster knowledge and self-relief skills, low fear in a disaster, and sense of control over a disaster. Using the PCSDQ to assess a person’s psychological competencies for disaster survival will make it possible to provide that person with an individualized and targeted disaster self-relief education and/or training program. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2014;0:1-9)

Keywords

disasterself-reliefpsychological competencyquestionnaire
Type
Original Article
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 220 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Guha-Sapir, D, Vos, F, Below, R, Ponserre, S. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2011: The Number and Trends. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED); 2012.Google Scholar
2.Hill, H, Wiener, J, Warner, K. From fatalism to resilience: reducing disaster impacts through systematic investments. Disasters. 2012; 36(2):175-194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Mishra, V, Fuloria, S, Bisht, S. Enhancing disaster management by mapping disaster proneness and preparedness. Disasters. 2012; 36(3):382-397.Google Scholar
4Joerin, J, Shaw, R, Takeuchi, Y, Krishnamurthy, R. Action-oriented resilience assessment of communities in Chennai, India. Environ Hazards. 2012; 11(3):226-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters(CRED). Technological disasters reported1900 –2011: The international diasster database (EM-DAT). http://www.emdat.be/technological-disasters-trends. Accessed Octorber 29, 2013.Google Scholar
6.Jonkmana, SN, Lentz, A, Vrijling, JK. A general approach for the estimation of loss of life due to natural and technological disasters. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2010; 95:1123-1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kenny, C. Disaster risk reduction in developing countries: costs, benefits and institutions. Disasters. 2012; 36(4):559-588.Google Scholar
8.Jonkman, SN. Global perspectives on loss of human life. Nat Hazards. 2005; 34:151-175.Google Scholar
9.Day, JM, Melnyk, SA, Larson, PD, Whybark, DC, Davis, EW. Humanitarian and disaster relief supply chains: a matter of life and death. J Supply Chain Manag. 2012; 48(2):21-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kobes, M, Helsloot, I, de Vries, B, et al. Exit choice, (pre-)movement time and (pre-)evacuation behaviour in hotel fire evacuation-behavioural analysis and validation of the use of serious gaming in experimental research. Procedia Eng. 2010; 3:37-51.Google Scholar
11.Purser, DA, Bensilum, M. Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Saf Sci. 2001; 38:157-182.Google Scholar
12.Shermana, MF, Peyrot, M, Magda, LA, Gershon, RRM. Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2: a revisit using regression analysis. Fire Saf J. 2011; 46(7):414-424.Google Scholar
13.McConnell, N, Boyce, K, Shields, J. The UK 9/11 evacuation study: analysis of survivors’ recognition and response phase in WTC1. Fire Saf J. 2010; 45:21-34.Google Scholar
14.McClelland, D. Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. Am Psychol. 1973; 28:1-14.Google Scholar
15.Norio, O, Ye, T, Kajitani, Y, Shi, P, Tatano, H. The 2011 Eastern Japan Great Earthquake disaster: overview and comments. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2011; 2(1):34-42.Google Scholar
16.Vorst, H. Evacuation models and disaster psychology. Procedia Eng. 2010; 3:15-21.Google Scholar
17.Ozel, F. Time pressure and stress as a factor during emergency egress. Saf Sci. 2001; 38:95-107.Google Scholar
18.Lambourne, K, Tomporowski, P. The effect of exercise-induced arousal on cognitive task performance: a meta-regression analysis. Brain Res. 2010; 1341:12-24.Google Scholar
19.Cai, H, Lin, Y. Modeling of operators’ emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2011; 69:571-586.Google Scholar
20.Lupien, SJ, Maheu, F, Tu, M, Fiocco, A, Schramek, TE. The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain Cogn. 2007; 65(3):209-237.Google Scholar
21.Coget, J, Haag, C, Gibson, D. Anger and fear in decision-making: the case of film directors on set. Eur Manag J. 2011; 29:476-490.Google Scholar
22.Sayegh, L, Anthony, W, Perrewe, P. Managerial decision-making under crisis: the role of emotion in an intuitive decision process. Hum Resource Manag Rev. 2004; 14:179-199.Google Scholar
23.Zakowski, S, Hall, M, Klein, L, Baum, H. Appraised control, coping, and stress in a community sample: a test of the goodness-of-fit hypothesis. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(3):158-165.Google Scholar
24.Ripley, A. How to survive a disaster. Time. 2008; 171(23):40-45.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Friedkin, NE. The attitude-behavior linkage in behavioral cascades. Soc Psychol Q. 2010; 73(2):196-213.Google Scholar
26.Norris, F, Murrell, S. Prior experience as a moderator of disaster impact on anxiety symptoms in older adults. Am J Community Psychol. 1988; 16(5):665-683.Google Scholar
27.Hooper, D, Coughlan, J, Mullen, M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Meth. 2008; 6(1):53-60.Google Scholar
28.Streiner, DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2010; 80(1):99-103.Google Scholar
29.Miceli, R, Sotgiu, I, Settanni, M. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol. 2008; 28:164-173.Google Scholar
30.Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Coping and adaptation. In: Gentry WD, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Medicine. New York, New York: Guilford Press; 1984: 282-325.Google Scholar
31.Folkman, S, Lazarus, RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980; 21(3):219-239.Google Scholar
32.Johnston, R. Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum. J Environ Econ Manag. 2006; 52:469-481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar