Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:27:22.174Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Deadly yet Preventable? Lessons From South Korea’s Halloween Crowd Crush

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

Zhaohui Su*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Institute for Human Rights, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Ali Cheshmehzangi
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Barry L. Bentley
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom Collaboration for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation, University College London, London, UK
Dean McDonnell
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, South East Technological University, Carlow, Ireland
Junaid Ahmad
Affiliation:
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Sabina Šegalo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia, and Herzegovina
Claudimar P. da Veiga*
Affiliation:
FDC Business School, Fundação Dom Cabral, Nova Lima, MG, Brazil
Yu-Tao Xiang*
Affiliation:
Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, University of Macau, Macao, China
*
Corresponding authors: Zhaohui Su, Claudimar P. da Veiga and Yu-Tao Xiang; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Corresponding authors: Zhaohui Su, Claudimar P. da Veiga and Yu-Tao Xiang; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Corresponding authors: Zhaohui Su, Claudimar P. da Veiga and Yu-Tao Xiang; Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

Avoidable disasters are both saddening and baffling. In 2022, 159 people, mostly in their 20s, and 30s were crushed to death in Itaewon’s narrow alleyway amid South Korea’s first pandemic-restrictions-free Halloween celebration. What is particularly sobering about this tragedy is that although many people called police hotlines as crowds became cramped and static, their calls went unheeded for hours. Rather than order independent investigations into the catastrophe (as of January 2024), the President of South Korea at the time focused on superficial issues such as asking the public to refer to the disaster as an “accident” (which it was not, it was an avoidable disaster) and the casualties as “the dead” (who are casualties indeed, instead of victims of a preventable tragedy). In this paper, we examine how officials’ complacency about public health and safety dangers, ineffective disaster prevention, and preparedness systems, as well as the government’s chronic lack of prioritization of public health and safety may have contributed to the disaster. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of creating integrated public health and safety protection systems to prevent similar tragedies from happening.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blair, G. At least 153 killed in crowd crush during Halloween festivities in Seoul. Published 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/29/dozens-of-people-crushed-by-large-crowd-at-halloween-festivities-in-south-korea. Accessed October 30, 2022.Google Scholar
Sohn, J, Yoon, D, Martin, TW. South Korea Halloween tragedy claims mostly young revelers. Published 2022. https://www.wsj.com/articles/south-korea-halloween-tragedy-claims-mostly-young-revelers-11667133329. Accessed October 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Sang-Hun, C. Little punishment or change after South Korea’s Halloween calamity. Published 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/21/world/asia/itaewon-halloween-crush. Accessed January 4, 2024.Google Scholar
Y-k, Kim, H-G, Sohn. Disaster risk management in the Republic of Korea. Singapore: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
Yu, Q, Hu, L, Alzahrani, B, et al. Intelligent visual-IoT-enabled real-time 3D visualization for autonomous crowd management. IEEE Wireless Commun. 2021;28(4):3441.Google Scholar
Johansson, A, Batty, M, Hayashi, K, et al. Crowd and environmental management during mass gatherings. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(2):150–6.Google Scholar
Su, Z. Rigorous policy-making amid COVID-19 and beyond: literature review and critical insights. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12447.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Ahmad, J. The need for a disaster readiness mindset: a key lesson from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(4):538539.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Wen, J, et al. Mental health consequences of COVID-19 media coverage: the need for effective crisis communication practices. Global and Health. 2021;17(1):4.Google Scholar
Su, Z, Zhang, H, McDonnell, D, et al. Crisis communication strategies for health officials. Front Public Health. 2022;10:796572.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Cheshmehzangi, A, et al. Public health crises and Ukrainian refugees. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;103:243–5.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Bentley, BL, et al. Pandemic volunteers: the imperative for regulations and training. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024;18:e36.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Bennett, B, et al. Psychoneuroimmunology concerns of the Olympic boycotts. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;102:206–8.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Cheshmehzangi, A, et al. How to join and stay in the Olympic COVID-free “bubble”? Brain Behav Immun - Health. 2022;20:100424.Google Scholar
Su, Z, McDonnell, D, Ahmad, J, et al. Disaster preparedness in healthcare professionals amid COVID-19 and beyond: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;69:103583.Google Scholar
Shimul, SN, Alradie-Mohamed, A, Kabir, R, et al. Effect of easing lockdown and restriction measures on COVID-19 epidemic projection: a case study of Saudi Arabia. PLOS One. 2021;16(9):e0256958.Google Scholar
Doogan, C, Buntine, W, Linger, H, et al. Public perceptions, and attitudes toward COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across six countries: a topic modeling analysis of Twitter data. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21419.Google Scholar