Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:39:09.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Inter-regional US Blood Supply Simulation Model to Evaluate Blood Availability to Support Planning for Emergency Preparedness and Medical Countermeasures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

Arianna Simonetti*
Affiliation:
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Hussein Ezzeldin
Affiliation:
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Mark Walderhaug
Affiliation:
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Steven A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
Richard A. Forshee
Affiliation:
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Arianna Simonetti, PhD, Mathematical Statistician for Risk Assessment, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Bldg. 71, Room 1236, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objectives

Planning for a response to threats like pandemics or mass casualty events is a national priority. The US blood supply system can be particularly vulnerable to such events. It is important to understand the impacts of emergency situations on blood availability and the resiliency of the US blood supply system.

Methods

On the basis of the Stock-and-Flow simulation model of the US blood supply system, we developed an inter-regional blood transfer system representing the action of multiple blood collectors and distributors to enable effective planning of strategies to minimize collection and donation disruptions to the blood supply system in the event of a national emergency.

Results

We simulated a pandemic or mass casualty event on both a national and an inter-regional blood supply system. Differences in the estimated impacts demonstrated the importance of incorporating spatial and temporal variations of blood collection and utilization across US regions. The absence of blood shortage in both emergency scenarios highlighted the resilience of the inter-regional system to meet the potential associated blood demand.

Conclusions

Our inter-regional model considered complex factors and can be a valuable tool to assist regulatory decision-making and strategic planning for emergency preparedness to avoid and mitigate associated adverse health consequences. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:201–210)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Altevogt, BM, Stroud, C, Wizemann, T. The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise: Innovative Strategies to Enhance Products from Discovery Through Approval: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.Google Scholar
2. Newmark, J. The Integrated National Biodefense Portfolio Initiative One-Portfolio. Falls Church, VA: Joint PEO (Chemical and Biological Defense), Joint Project Management Office. DTIC Document; 2009.Google Scholar
3. Birnkrant, D, Cox, E. The emergency use authorization of peramivir for treatment of 2009 H1N1 influenza. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2204-2207.Google Scholar
4. Simonetti, A, Forshee, RA, Anderson, SA, Walderhaug, M. A stock-and-flow simulation model of the US blood supply. Transfusion. 2014;54:828-838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. United States Food and Drug Administration. Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMi) (monograph on the internet). http://www.fda.gov/EmergencyPreparedness/Counterterrorism/MedicalCountermeasures/AboutMCMi/default.htm. Published 2010. Accessed November 1, 2015.Google Scholar
6. America’s Blood Centers. America’s Blood Centers website (monograph on the internet); 2014. http://www.americasblood.org/stoplight.aspx. Accessed May 14, 2014.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Program—General Information. Baltimore, MD: CMS (monograph on the internet) http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/MedicareGenInfo/index.html. Updated 24 March 2012. Accessed June 19, 2014.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Files for order-general information. Baltimore, MD: CMS (monograph on the internet). http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Files-for-Order/FilesForOrderGenInfo/index.html. Updated 23 April 2013. Accessed June 19, 2014.Google Scholar
9. Report of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The 2011 national blood collection and utilization survey report [Internet]. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health; 2013. http://www.hhs.gov/ash/bloodsafety/2011-nbcus.pdf.Google Scholar
10. Kamp, C, Heiden, M, Henseler, O, Seitz, R. Management of blood supplies during an influenza pandemic. Transfusion. 2010;50:231-239.Google Scholar
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National and Regional Level Outpatient Illness and Viral Surveillance. Published 2015. Accessed January 23, 2015. https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.htlm url:https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html.Google Scholar
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A weekly Influenza Surveillance Report Prepared by the Influenza Division, 2008-2015. Accessed January 27, 2015. http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/main.html.Google Scholar
13. Simonetti A, Forshee R, Anderson S, Walderhaug M. Use of Computer Simulation of the United States Blood Supply in Support of Planning for Emergency Preparedness and Medical Countermeasures. FDA/CBER/OBE. FDA CBER Public Workshop. July 24, 2012. https://www.ederalregister.gov/articles/2012/05/24/2012-12593/use-of-computer-simulation-of-the-united-states-blood-suply-in-support-of-planning-for-emergency.Google Scholar
14. Department of Homeland Security. National Planning Scenarios: Executive Summaries. Version 20.2. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, 2005. Accessed June 29, 2015. http://cees.tamiu.edu/covertheborder/TOOLS/NationalPlanningSen.pdf.Google Scholar
15. Knebel, AR, Coleman, CN, Cliffer, KD, et al. Allocation of scarce resources after a nuclear detonation: setting the context. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S20-S31.Google Scholar
16. DiCarlo, AL, Maher, C, Hick, JL, et al. Radiation injury after a nuclear detonation: medical consequences and the need for scarce resources allocation. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S32-S44.Google Scholar
17. Como, JJ, Dutton, RP, Scalea, TM, Edelman, BB, Hess, JR. Blood transfusion rates in the care of acute trauma. Transfusion. 2004;44:809-813.Google Scholar
18. Sugarman, SL, Goans, RE, Garrett, AS, Livingston, GK. The Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS). The Medical Aspects of Radiation Incidents. Oak Ridge; 2013 Accessed June 29, 2015. http://orise.orau.gov/files/reacts/medical-aspects-of-radiation-incidents.pdf.Google Scholar
19. Fliedner, TM, Friesecke, I, Beyrer, K. Medical Management of Radiation Accidents: Manual on the Acute Radiation Syndrome. London: British Institute of Radiology; 2001.Google Scholar
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011-2012.Google Scholar
21. Napolitano, LM, Kurek, S, Luchette, FA, et al. Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care. Critical Care Med. 2009;37:3124-3157.Google Scholar
22. Thurer, R, Katz, R, Parce, P, Precopio, T, Popovsky, M. By How Much Does a Single Unit Transfusion Increase the Recipient’s Hemoglobin? AABB 2010. Baltimore, MD/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc; 2010; 135A-136A.Google Scholar
23. McCullough, J. Collection and use of stem cells; role of transfusion centers in bone marrow transplantation. Vox sanguinis. 1994; 67(s3):35-42.Google Scholar
24. Rice, PL, Orgill, DP. Emergency care of moderate and severe thermal burns in adults. In: Marx JA, Grayzel J, eds. 2008. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/emergency-care-of-moderate-and-severe-thermal-burns-in-adults.Google Scholar
25. Brownlee, S, Barry, MJ, Fisher, ES, Bynum, JPW, Goodman, DC. Improving Patient Decision-Making in Health Care: A 2012 Dartmouth Atlas Series. 2012.Google Scholar
26. Anderson, SA, Menis, M, O’Connell, K, Burwen, DR. Blood use by inpatient elderly population in the United States. Transfusion. 2007;47:582-592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Flynn, DF, Goans, RE. Triage and treatment of radiation and combined-injury mass casualties. In: Mickelson AB, ed. Medical Consequences of Radiological and Nuclear Weapons. Fort Detrick, MD: Office of the Surgeon General, Borden Institute; 2012:39-71. http://www.cs.amedd.army.mil/borden/FileDownloadpublic.aspx?docid=b3d9d96a-a8b8-499c-bddf-e27791466b77.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Simonetti et al supplementary material

Simonetti et al supplementary material 1

Download Simonetti et al supplementary material(File)
File 462.3 KB