Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:10:56.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Care Sites During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Policy Implications for Pandemic Surge Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2021

Sue Anne Bell Open the ORCID record for Sue Anne Bell [Opens in a new window] ,
Lydia Krienke  and
Kathryn Quanstrom
Sue Anne Bell*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Lydia Krienke
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Kathryn Quanstrom
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
Corresponding Author: Sue Anne Bell, Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alternative care sites (ACS) across the United States were widely underutilized during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, while the volume and severity of COVID-19 cases overwhelmed health systems across the United States. The challenges presented by the pandemic have shown the need to design surge capacity principles with consideration for demand that strains multiple response capabilities. We reviewed current policy and previous literature from past ACS as well as highlighted challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic, to make recommendations that can inform future surge capacity planning. Our recommendations include: (1) Preparedness actions need to be continuous and flexible; (2) staffing needs must be met as they arise with solutions that are specific to the pandemic; 3) health equity must be a focus of ACS establishment and planning; and (4) ACS should be designed to function without compromising safe and effective care. A critical opportunity exists to identify improvements for future use of ACS in pandemics.

Keywords

alternative care sitepandemicpolicypreparedness
Type
Report from the Field
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 2673 - 2675
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Federal Healthcare Resilience Task Force Alternate Care Site (ACS) Toolkit. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.Google Scholar
Jada, Y, Guarino, B. The military’s medical “relief valves” remain mostly empty in New York. This is why. Washington, DC: The Washington Post; 2020.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, B. Michigan: 8 patients admitted so far to TCF Center’s 1,000-bed setup. Detroit, MI: The Detroit News; 2020.Google Scholar
Hick, JL, Christian, MD, Sprung, CL. Chapter 2. Surge capacity and infrastructure considerations for mass critical care. Recommendations and standard operating procedures for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(Suppl 1):S11-S20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkat, A, Wolf, L, Geiderman, JM, et al. Ethical issues in the response to Ebola virus disease in US emergency departments: a position paper of the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Emergency Nurses Association and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Emerg Nurs. 2015;41(2):e5-e16.Google ScholarPubMed
Nixon, SA. The coin model of privilege and critical allyship: implications for health. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, L, Hawkins, J, Langness, S, et al. Where are all the patients? Addressing COVID-19 fear to encourage sick patients to seek emergency care. New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. N Engl J Med. 2020;epub. doi:10.1056/CAT.20.0193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matrajt, L, Leung, T. Evaluating the effectiveness of social distancing interventions to delay or flatten the epidemic curve of coronavirus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(8).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, SA, Dossett, LA, Cespero, J, et al. T-minus 10 days: the role of an academic medical institution in field hospital planning. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021;36(3):338-343.Google ScholarPubMed
Hodge, JG Jr, Hanfling, D, Hick, JL, Piatt, JL. Diminishing disparities in U.S. crisis standards of care: medical and legal challenges. Lancet. 2021;34:100838.Google ScholarPubMed