Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:16:13.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adherence to Emergency Public Health Measures for Bioevents: Review of US Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2018

Robyn R. Gershon ,
Qi Zhi ,
Alexander F. Chin ,
Ezinne M. Nwankwo  and
Lisa M. Gargano
Robyn R. Gershon*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York
Qi Zhi
Affiliation:
Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Alexander F. Chin
Affiliation:
Global Health Sciences, Graduate Division, University of California, San Francisco
Ezinne M. Nwankwo
Affiliation:
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles
Lisa M. Gargano
Affiliation:
World Trade Center Health Registry, Division of Epidemiology, and New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Robyn R. Gershon, DrPH, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10003. (email: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The frequency of bioevents is increasing worldwide. In the United States, as elsewhere, control of contagion may require the cooperation of community members with emergency public health measures. The US general public is largely unfamiliar with these measures, and our understanding of factors that influence behaviors in this context is limited. The few previous reviews of research on this topic focused on non-US samples. For this review, we examined published research on the psychosocial influences of adherence in US sample populations. Of 153 articles identified, only 9 met the inclusion criteria. Adherence behaviors were categorized into 2 groups: self-protective behaviors (personal hygiene, social distancing, face mask use, seeking out health care advice, and vaccination) and protecting others (isolation, temperature screening, and quarantine). A lack of uniformity across studies regarding definitions and measures was noted. Only 5 of the 9 articles reported tests of association between adherence with emergency measures and psychosocial factors; perceived risk and perceived seriousness were found to be significantly associated with adherence or adherence intentions. Although it is well documented that psychosocial factors are important predictors of protective health behaviors in general, this has not been rigorously studied in the context of bioevents. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:528–535)

Keywords

emergency public health measuresadherencepsychosocial
Type
Systematic Review
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 528 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jones, KE, Patel, NG, Levy, MA, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451(7181):990-993. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06536.Google Scholar
2. Morse, SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0101.950102.Google Scholar
3. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The U.S. Government & Global Emerging Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response. http://kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-global-emerging-infectious-disease-preparedness-and-response/. Published December 8, 2014. Accessed March 3, 2017.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Zika Virus in Brazil. CDC website. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/alert/zika-brazil. Published 2016. Accessed June 24, 2016.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles Cases and Outbreaks. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html. Published 2017. Accessed March 3, 2017.Google Scholar
6. The National Academies Press. Global Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events: Understanding the Contributions to Infectious Disease Emergence: Workshop Summary. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12435/global-climate-change-and-extreme-weather-events-understanding-the-contributions. Published 2008. Accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
7. Arkin, J. Growing number of biosafety labs raises public health concern. https://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/08/20/15307/growing-number-biosafety-labs-raises-public-health-concern. Published 2014. Accessed October 9, 2017.Google Scholar
8. World Health Organization. Public health measures. http://www.who.int/influenza/preparedness/measures/en/. Accessed September 26, 2017.Google Scholar
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007IP/2007ip_part3.html#a. Accessed December 8, 2016.Google Scholar
10. Ejeta, L, Ardalan, A, Paton, D. Application of behavioral theories to disaster and emergency health preparedness: a systematic review [published online July 1, 2015]. PLoS Curr. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829.Google Scholar
11. Leppin, A, Aro, AR. Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(1):7-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8.Google Scholar
12. Bish, A, Michie, S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(4):797-824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826.Google Scholar
13. Bults, M, Beaujean, DJMA, Richardus, JH, Voeten, HACM. Perceptions and behavioral responses of the general public during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(2):207-219. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.160.Google Scholar
14. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (London). 2010;8(5):336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.Google Scholar
15. Yanni, EA, Marano, N, Han, P, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of US travelers to Asia regarding seasonal influenza and H5N1 avian influenza prevention measures. J Travel Med. 2010;17(6):374-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8305.2010.00458.x.Google Scholar
16. Kim, Y, Zhong, W, Jehn, M, Walsh, L. Public risk perceptions and preventive behaviors during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(2):145-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.87.Google Scholar
17. Loustalot, F, Silk, BJ, Gaither, A, et al. Household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and nonpharmaceutical interventions among households of high school students in San Antonio, Texas. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(suppl 1):S146-S153. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq057.Google Scholar
18. SteelFisher, GK, Blendon, RJ, Bekheit, MM, Lubell, K. The public’s response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:e65.Google Scholar
19. Blendon, RJ, Benson, JM, DesRoches, CM, Weldon, KJ. Using opinion surveys to track the public’s response to a bioterrorist attack. J Health Commun. 2004;8(S1):83-92.Google Scholar
20. Blendon, RJ, DesRoches, CM, Cetron, MS, Benson, JM, Meinhardt, T, Pollard, W. Attitudes toward the use of quarantine in a public health emergency in four countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(2):w15-w25. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.w15.Google Scholar
21. Ibuka, Y, Chapman, GB, Meyers, LA, Li, M, Galvani, AP. The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:296. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-296.Google Scholar
22. Jones, JH, Salathe, M. Early assessment of anxiety and behavioral response to novel swine-origin influenza A(H1N1). PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008032.Google Scholar
23. Horney, JA, Moore, Z, Davis, M, MacDonald, PDM. Intent to receive pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine, compliance with social distancing and sources of information in NC, 2009. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011226.Google Scholar
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Interim Recommendations for Facemask and Respirator Use for Home, Community, and Occupational Settings for Non-Ill Persons to Prevent Infection with 2009 H1N1. https://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/masks.htm#table1. Accessed December 12, 2016.Google Scholar
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quarantine and Isolation. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/. Published 2016. Accessed October 26, 2016.Google Scholar
26. Davila-Payan, C, Swann, J, Wortley, PM. System factors to explain H1N1 state vaccination rates for adults in US emergency response to pandemic. Vaccine. 2014;32(25):3088-3093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.069.Google Scholar
27. Blake, KD, Blendon, RJ, Viswanath, K. Employment and compliance with pandemic influenza mitigation recommendations. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(2):212-218. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1602.090638.Google Scholar
28. Priest, PC, Duncan, AR, Jennings, LC, Baker, MG. Thermal image scanning for influenza border screening: results of an airport screening study. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014490.Google Scholar
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Enhanced Ebola Screening to Start at Five U.S. Airports and New Tracking Program for all People Entering U.S. from Ebola-affected Countries. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p1008-ebola-screening.html. Published 2014. Accessed March 3, 2017.Google Scholar
30. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211.Google Scholar
31. RAND Corporation. Community Resilience. http://www.rand.org/topics/community-resilience.html#page-content. Accessed December 12, 2016.Google Scholar