Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:47:55.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postdisaster Health Communication and Information Sources: The Iowa Flood Scenario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Background: During June 2008, heavy precipitation and 500-year flood events resulted in the displacement of thousands of families throughout eastern Iowa. The objectives of this study were to assess the effectiveness and preferred sources of health messages communicated to the public following the disaster.

Methods: Three hundred twenty-seven households were surveyed in 4 counties hit hardest by the flooding. A 48-item questionnaire containing items on demographics, housing, health information sources, and 8 specific health issues was administered.

Results: Almost all of the participants (99.0%) received information on at least 1 of the health topics covered by the survey. Most participants received information regarding vaccination (84.1%), mold (79.5%), safe use of well water (62.7%), respirator use (58.7%), or stress (53.8%). Television was the primary (54.7%) and preferred (60.2%) source of health information for most people, followed by the Internet (11.0% and 30.3% as source and preference, respectively).

Conclusions: Public health messages were received by a wide audience in the flood-affected communities. Along with more traditional health communication channels such as television, radio, or newspapers, continued emphasis on the development of health information Web sites and other technological alternatives may result in useful and effective health communication in similar situations.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2010;4:129-134)

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.US Geologic Survey. 2008 Iowa Flood Information Page. http://ia.water.usgs.gov/flood/flood.html. Published June 24, 2008. Accessed September 8, 2008.Google Scholar
2.Federal Emergency Management Agency. National Situation Update. http://www.fema.gov/emergency/reports/2008/nat062808.shtm. Published June, 28, 2008. Accessed September, 4, 2008.Google Scholar
3.World Health Organization. Effective Communication during Public Health Emergencies: a WHO Handbook. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO%20MEDIA%20HANDBOOK.pdf. Published July, 2005. Accessed September 14, 2008.Google Scholar
4.Cretikos, M, Eastwood, K, Dalton, C.Household disaster preparedness and information sources: rapid cluster survey after a storm in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:19518533010.Google Scholar
5.Henderson, J, Henderson, L, Raskob, G.Chemical (VX) terrorist threat: public knowledge, attitudes, and responses. Biosecur and Bioterror. 2004;2:224228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Carbon monoxide poisoning after Hurricane Katrina—Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, August–September 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54 (39):996998.Google Scholar
7.Cukor, J, Restuccia, M.Carbon monoxide poisoning during natural disasters: the Hurricane Rita experience. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:261264.Google Scholar
8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Carbon monoxide exposures after Hurricane Ike–Texas, September 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:845849.Google Scholar