Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:52:57.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Global Collaboration for Community-Based Disaster Preparation and Health Promotion: Fukushima to Zuunbayan in Mongolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2020

Chieri Yamada Open the ORCID record for Chieri Yamada [Opens in a new window] ,
Bolormaa Tsedendamba ,
Amarbileg Shajbalidir ,
Teruko Horiuchi ,
Katsuko Suenaga ,
Manlaijav Gun-Aajav ,
Nyamdavaa Enkhgerel  and
Enkhtuya Palam
Chieri Yamada*
Affiliation:
Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Bolormaa Tsedendamba
Affiliation:
ZB Hospital, Department of Health, Dornogobi, Mongolia
Amarbileg Shajbalidir
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrant and Metereology Monitoring, Dorngobi, Mongolia
Teruko Horiuchi
Affiliation:
Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Katsuko Suenaga
Affiliation:
Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Manlaijav Gun-Aajav
Affiliation:
The Executive Office of the Nuclear Energy Commission, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Nyamdavaa Enkhgerel
Affiliation:
The Executive Office of the Nuclear Energy Commission, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Enkhtuya Palam
Affiliation:
National Center for Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Chieri Yamada, Department of Public Health Nursing for International Radiation Exposure, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excessive radiation exposure has adverse effects on health. In Fukushima, psychological issues such as anxiety are still affecting people nine years after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in 2011. In light of the lessons learned from Fukushima communities, a joint Japanese and Mongolian research team introduced a community program to the Zuunbayan district in Mongolia, which is located near a uranium deposit, to promote good health by strengthening radiation emergency preparedness. The program, which commenced in 2017, aimed to increase community participation, education, information dissemination, and capacity of community preparedness. After two years a monitoring study showed that, out of 227 respondents, the proportions who thought that any level of radiation was dangerous decreased from 53.3% in 2017 to 33.9% in 2019. Moreover, half of the respondents knew that there were safe and unsafe radiation levels and that their community was safe. This global collaboration demonstrated that a lesson learned from a disaster can be applied to other countries and changed people’s recognition and behavior toward good health and disaster/emergency preparedness.

Keywords

community participationcommunity and individual resilienceglobal collaborationhealth promotionradiation exposure
Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 296 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

World Health Organization (WHO). 1986-2016: CHERNOBYL at 30, An update. https://www.who.int/who-documents-detail/1986-2016-chernobyl-at-30. Published 2016. Accessed January 13, 2017.Google Scholar
Shore, R, Fleck, F. Lessons from Fukushima: scientists need to communicate better. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(6):396–397.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO). Health effects of the UN Chernobyl accident and special health care programmes: report of the UN Chernobyl forum expert group “Health.” Bennett B, Repacholi M, Carr Z eds; 2006:93–97.Google Scholar
Bromet, EJ, Havenaar, JM, Guey, LT. A 25 year retrospective review of the psychological consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Clin Oncol. 2011;23(4):297–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minami-Souma City and Namie Town, Fukushima. A report of official investigation to affected local governments by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants Accident; 2014. https://www.city.hakodate.hokkaido.jp/docs/2014022100394/files/fukusima_houkokusho.pdf. Accessed May, 2019.Google Scholar
Nakai, K. A research of first responses among local governments and community peoples affected by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants Explosion; 2014. https://www.jst.go.jp/ristex/pdf/anzenanshin/nakai_1.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2020.Google Scholar
Okazaki, R, Ohga, K, Yoko-O, M, Kohzaki, M. A Survey about the Radiation Effects and A Health Survey of Fukushima Inhabitants after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. J UOEH. 2017;39(4):277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirota, S, Terada, N. Houshasen wo jibun de sokutei surukoto ga huan ni dou eikyo suruka [How people’s self-measurement of terrestrial radiation would influence their anxiety to the radiation exposure] Journal of Information Studies. 2014;15:23–31. [in Japanese]Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Y, Takada, M, Sakamaki, T, et al. Development and delivery of a lecture on basic radiology for adults. Journal of Japan Society for Scientific Education. 2011;35:293–294.Google Scholar
Israel, BA, Schulz, AJ, Parker, EA, Becker, AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omori, Y, Sorimachi, A, Gun-Aajav, M, et al. Gamma dose rate distribution in the Unegt sub-basin, a uranium deposit area in Dornogobi Province, southeastern Mongolia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(32):33494–33506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. Growth reference data for 5-19 years; 2006. https://www.who.int/growthref/en/. Accessed July 28, 2017.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Anthro for personal computers, version 3.2.2, 2011: Software for assessing growth and development of the world’s children. Geneva, 2010. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/en/. Accessed July 28, 2017.Google Scholar
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection of the public in situations of prolonged radiation exposure. Ann ICRP. 1999;29(1-2):1–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Society. Research Reference Sheet, RRS 2 Community baseline data, VCA toolbox with reference sheets. 2007;54–59. https://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/vca/vca-toolbox-en.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Fukushima Prefecture. Disaster Preparedness Guidebook in English. https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/259583.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2018.Google Scholar
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York: UNSCEAR 2008 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes, Volume I; 2010.Google Scholar
SPSS® Statistics [computer program]. Japanese version 26, 64 bits, IBM®, NY, USA; 2018.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Hepatitis: a crisis in Mongolia. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/news/feature-stories/detail/hepatitis-a-crisis-in-mongolia. Accessed December 23, 2019.Google Scholar
World Cancer Research Fund International. Liver cancer statistics, https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/liver-cancer-statistics. Accessed December 11, 2018.Google Scholar