Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:04:06.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Error-Prone Operational Steps and Key Sites of Self-Contamination During Donning and Doffing of Personal Protective Equipment by Health Care Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2021

Hui-Lan Zhang ,
Sha Yang Open the ORCID record for Sha Yang [Opens in a new window] ,
Hong-Xia Luo  and
Jian-Ping You
Hui-Lan Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
Sha Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
Hong-Xia Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
Jian-Ping You*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
*
Corresponding Author: Jian-Ping You, Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study aims to identify error-prone operational steps and key sites of self-contamination during donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE).

Methods:

A total of 56 health care workers, including 37 nurses and 19 physicians, were recruited to don and doff the PPE recommended by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Operational errors and sites of self-contamination were recorded using UV-fluorescent labeling and video surveillance.

Results:

Three main errors during donning were identified: choosing a loose-fitting coverall that was difficult to handle; ignoring to inspect the seal of N95 respirator or gloves; and forgetting to pull up the zipper completely. Four main errors during doffing were identified: removing the N95 respirator in a wrong way; touching the scrubs with contaminated hands and elbows; touching contaminated external surfaces of the goggles; and performing insufficient hand hygiene. Key sites that were easily contaminated during the doffing of PPE included left hand and wrist, left lower leg, chest, and left abdomen.

Conclusion:

Identifying the steps prone to errors and key sites of self-contamination in the process of PPE donning and doffing can facilitate the training of PPE use and provide detailed evidence for optimizing standardized protocols to reduce contamination.

Keywords

health care workerspersonal protective equipmentself-contamination
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 2486 - 2491
Copyright
© Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization. Health worker Ebola infections in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-EVD-SDS-REPORT-2015.1. Accessed October 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Fischer, WA, Weber, DJ, Wohl, DA. Personal protective equipment: protecting health care providers in an Ebola outbreak. Clin Ther. 2015;37:2402-2410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.007.Google Scholar
Selvaraj, SA, Lee, KE, Harrell, M, et al. Infection rates and risk factors for infection among health workers during Ebola and Marburg virus outbreaks: a systematic review. J Infect Dis. 2018;22:679-689. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, JH, Burnham, CD, Reske, KA, et al. Assessment of healthcare worker protocol deviations and self-contamination during personal protective equipment donning and doffing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:1077-1083. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, J, Kim, EJ, Choi, JH, et al. Difficulties in using personal protective equipment: training experiences with the 2015 outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome in Korea. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:235-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, W, Li, S, Kun, L, et al. Analysis of SARS infection of health care workers in Beijing (in Chinese). Chin J Nosocomiol. 2003;13:703-706.Google Scholar
Hu, X, Zhang, Z, Li, N, et al. Self-reported use of personal protective equipment among Chinese critical care clinicians during 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Flow chart of personal protection technology for Ebola hemorrhagic fever. 2014. http://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/crb/qt/ablcxr/jszl_2273/201409/t20140915_104435.html. Accessed April 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Poller, B, Hall, S, Bailey, C, et al. VIOLET’: a fluorescence-based simulation exercise for training healthcare workers in the use of personal protective equipment. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touchstone. Women’s personal protective equipment: one size does not fit all. Blog. 2016. https://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2016/06/womens-personal-protective-equipment-one-size-not-fit/. Accessed October 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Baloh, J, Reisinger, HS, Dukes, K, et al. Healthcare workers’ strategies for doffing personal protective equipment. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(3):S192-S198. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, H, Yeon, M, Park, JW, et al. Healthcare worker infected with Middle East respiratory syndrome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Korea, 2015. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017052. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reidy, P, Fletcher, T, Shieber, C, et al. Personal protective equipment solution for UK military medical personnel working in an Ebola virus disease treatment unit in Sierra Leone. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96(1):42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S, Poller, B, Bailey, C, et al. Use of ultraviolet-fluorescence-based simulation in evaluation of personal protective equipment worn for first assessment and care of a patient with suspected high-consequence infectious disease. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99:218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alhmidi, H, Koganti, S, Tomas, ME, et al. A pilot study to assess use of fluorescent lotion in patient care simulations to illustrate pathogen dissemination and train personnel in correct use of personal protective equipment. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5(1):40-45. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0141-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, J, O’Donnell, JM, Colaianne, B, et al. Use of personal protective equipment among health care personnel: results of clinical observations and simulations. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, DJ, Liang, SY, Smith, CL, et al. Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, medical coveralls, and hands of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:716-721. doi: 10.1086/653201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DJ, Rogawski, E, Thom, KA, et al. Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to healthcare workers’ gloves and medical coveralls after patient contact increases with environmental contamination. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1045-1051. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar