Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:31:12.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency Preparedness in Elderly Care in Sweden: A Study of Staff Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2017

Carin Björngren Cuadra
Carin Björngren Cuadra*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Carin Björngren Cuadra, Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to investigate the interface between elderly care and emergency preparedness from the elderly care staff’s perspective.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire was sent to elderly care staff in 4 Swedish municipalities. The questions involved experiences of extraordinary events, education and exercises, and risk and vulnerability analyses, evaluations of main risks and emergency preparedness, and familiarity with preparedness plans. In total, 568 elderly care staff responded.

Results

Between 15% and 25% of the respondents claimed experiences of extraordinary events, exercises and education, and risk and vulnerability analyses. The same number claimed familiarity with the organization’s preparedness plan, whereas ~85% answered that they need more education and exercises. Emergency preparedness was evaluated as important. The experiences and risks referred to pertained to both official categories used within emergency preparedness and issues such as work conditions, seniors’ fall accidents.

Conclusion

Elderly care staff, though highly motivated, do not seem to be involved in emergency preparedness and are not targeted to a large extent when education and training are organized. A development of the interface between emergency preparedness and elderly care could require a clarification of the scope and context of emergency preparedness and of differing understandings of central concepts. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:86–93)

Keywords

emergency preparednesselderly carestaff perspectivesSweden
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 86 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Strategi för skydda av samhällsviktig verksamhet [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Strategy for protection of critical infrastructure]. https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/27271.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
2. Social Services Act (No. 453/2001).Google Scholar
3. Szebehely, M, Trydegård, G-B. Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health Soc Care Community. 2012;20(3):300-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x.Google Scholar
4. Socialstyrelsen. Vård i livets slutskede. Socialstyrelsens bedömning av utvecklingen i landsting och kommuner [The Board of Health and Welfare. Care in the End of Life. The Board’s Assessment of the Development in County Councils and Municipalities], Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm. 2006.Google Scholar
5. Socialstyrelsen. Krisberedskap inom socialtjänstens område [The Board of Health and Welfare. Crisis Preparedness in Social Services. A Guidance], Socialstyrelsen, Vägledning. Stockholm. 2009.Google Scholar
6. Act (No. 545/2006) on Measures to be taken by Municipalities and County Council in Preparedness for and during Extraordinary Incidents during Peacetime and Periods of Heightened Alert.Google Scholar
7. Lindberg, H, Sundelius, B. Whole-of-society disaster resilience: the Swedish way. In: Kamien DG, ed. Homeland Security Handbook. New York: The McGraw-Hill; 2012:1295–1319.Google Scholar
8. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Gemensamma grunder för samverkan och ledning vid samhällsstörningar [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Common ground for cooperation and leadership in societal disturbances]; 2015. https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/27483.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
9. Cuadra, CB. Disaster social work in Sweden: context, practice and challenges in an international perspective. The Nordic Welfare Watch – in Response to Crisis Working Paper, Reykjavik: The Nordic Council of Ministries, University of Iceland, Vol. 1. 2015.Google Scholar
10. Danielsson, E. Following routines: a challenge in cross-sectional collaboration. J Conting Crisis Manage. 2016;24(1):36-45.Google Scholar
11. Hasenfeld, Y. Human Service Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1983.Google Scholar
12. Webb, SA. Social Work in a Risk Society. Social and Political Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.Google Scholar
13. Desai, AS. Disaster and social work responses. In: Dominelli L, ed. Revitalising Communities in a Globalising World. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:261-275.Google Scholar
14. International Association of Schools of Social Work. Policy Document on Disaster Interventions for Consideration by IASSW Board: January 2010, Position Paper. http://www.iassw-aiets.org/sustainability-climate-change-disaster-intervention-committee/. Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
15. Enander, A., Hede, S., Lajksjö, O. 2014 Why worry? Motivation for crisis preparedness work among municipal leaders in Sweden. J Conting Crisis Mange. 23(1):1-10.Google Scholar
16. Sparf, J. Tillit i samhällsskyddets organisation. Om det sociala gränssnittet mellan kommuner och funktionshindrade i risk- och krishantering [Trust in civil protection and preparedness. On the social interface in risk and crisis management between disabled people and municipal organisation]. Mid University, Östersund; 2014.Google Scholar
17. Nieminen Kristofersson, T. Krisgrupper och spontant stöd. Om insatser efter branden I Göteborg 1998 [Crisis groups and spontaneous support. On interventions in the wake of the Gothenburg fire]. School of Social Work, Lund: Lund University; 2002.Google Scholar
18. Teasley, M, Moore, JA. Disaster recovery case management: social work and multicultural education. In: Gillespie DF, Danso K, eds. Disaster Concepts and Issues: A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press; 2010:214-254.Google Scholar
19. Thomas, RL, Healy, L. Be prepared: incorporating disaster content in an era of gloablization and climate change. In: Gillespie D, Danso K, eds. Disasters and Concepts and Issues. A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE-Press; 2010:89-110.Google Scholar
20. Gillespie, DF, Danso, K. eds. Disaster Concepts and Issues: A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press; 2010.Google Scholar
21. Soligman, HH, Rogge, ME. Ethical considerations in disaster services: a social work perspective. Electron J Soc Work. 2002;1(1):1-22.Google Scholar
22. Gutman, GM, Yon, Y. Elder abuse and neglect in disasters: types, prevalence and research gaps. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014;10:38-47.Google Scholar
23. Eydal, GB, Ómarsdóttir, IL, Cuadra, CB, et al, Local social services in Nordic countries in times of disasters. Report for the Nordic Council of Ministers; Reykjavik; 2016.Google Scholar
24. Ethical Review Act (No. 460/2003).Google Scholar
25. Robson, C. Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner – Researchers. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2002.Google Scholar
26. Bryman, A. Social Research Methods, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
27. Socialstyrelsen. Socialstyrelsens risk- och sårbarhetsanalys 2014 [The Board of Health and Welfare Stockholm. Risk and vulnerability analysis 2014]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm; 2015.Google Scholar
28. Sannerstedt, A. Implementering – hur politiska beslut genomförs i praktiken [Implementation – how political decisions are put into practice]. In: Rothstein B, ed. Politisk organisation. Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem [Political Organisation. The Basic Problems of Political Management]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag; 2001:18-48.Google Scholar
29. Renn, O, Klinke, A, van Asselt, M. Coping with complexities, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis. Ambio. 2011;40:231-246.Google Scholar