Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:54:55.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adequacy of Pediatric Triage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Pharrah Debono ,
Juanita Debattista ,
Simon Attard-Montalto  and
David Pace
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: To assess the adequacy of the pediatric triage system in an acute care general hospital.

Methods: All children younger than 14 years of age who presented with a primary medical condition to the accident and emergency department (ED) during January to March 2009 were recruited. Suitability of the triage system was assessed according to the vital parameters taken and the priority code assigned. Triage workload was assessed from the number of children presenting to ED and the timing of presentation.

Results: Of 2269 children presenting to ED, 1617 (71.3%) were younger than 5 years, and 883 (38.9%) were younger than 2 years. Only 0.26% (6/2269) had four vital parameters crucial for priority assignment measured, and 19.3% (437/2269) had at least one parameter measured. A priority code was assigned to 10% (225/2269).

Conclusions: Our study revealed inadequacies in the pediatric triage system. A simple and objective triage system that is based on the measurement of crucial vital parameters and on prompt recognition of warning signs and symptoms to correctly identify high-risk groups has been introduced to ensure appropriate and effective triage of sick children.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;6:151–154)

Keywords

emergency serviceschildrentriageChildren's HealthTriageEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 151 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Joint Policy Statement—Guidelines for Care of Children in the Emergency Department American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Committee, Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:543–552.Google Scholar
2.Cretikos, MA, Bellomo, R, Hillman, K, Chen, J, Finfer, S, Flabouris, A.Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust. 2008;188 (11):657–659.Google Scholar
3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). American Academy of Pediatrics.2009-2010 Influenza Season Triage Algorithm for Children (≤ 18 years) With Influenza-Like Illness. www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/clinicians/pdf/childalgorithm.pdf. Accessed October 3, 2010.Google Scholar
4.Thompson, M, Coad, N, Harnden, A, Mayon-White, R, Perera, R, Mant, D.How well do vital signs identify children with serious infections in paediatric emergency care? Arch Dis Child. 2009;94 (11):888–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.van Veen, M, Moll, HA.Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:38.Google Scholar
6.Thompson, MJ, Mayon-White, R, Harnden, A, Perera, R, McLeod, D, Mant, D.Using vital signs to assess children with acute infections: a survey of current practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58 (549):236–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Parshuram, CS, Hutchison, J, Middaugh, K.Development and initial validation of the bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Crit Care. 2009;13 (4):R135.Google Scholar
8.Adshead, N, Thomson, R.Use of a paediatric early warning system in emergency departments. Emerg Nurse. 2009;17 (1):22–25.Google Scholar
9.Cooper, DJ, Buist, MD.Vitalness of vital signs, and medical emergency teams. Med J Aust. 2008;188 (11):630–631.Google Scholar