Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:22:39.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transmitting Knowledge in the 18th Century: The Case of Président de Brosses and Abate Antonio Niccolini

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John Rogister
John Rogister*
Affiliation:
Institut de France, Paris
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The 18th century in Europe is the ideal period to study the interaction of traditional beliefs and new ideas stemming from scientific observation and philosophical rationalization. The purpose of this paper is to examine the role played by Charles de Brosses and Antonio Niccolini in the process of transmission of knowledge coming through influential members of a European aristocracy that remained attached to traditional values. In fact, the rediscovery of the Classical heritage and its dissemination in print, albeit an expensive enterprise, was not deemed by men such as Niccolini and de Brosses as incompatible with their traditional religious beliefs. The unpublished correspondence between these two men provides the evidence for this claim. The two men exchanged information about the continental nature of Australasia, about the latest mathematical discoveries, about the origin of languages and on oriental religions. At the same time, their religious and political convictions remained firmly based on the received notions about religion and society.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , May 2008 , pp. 77 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2008

References

Barocchi, P., Gallo, D. (1985) L'Accademia etrusca. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2004) ‘Quelle théorie du comportement pour les sciences sociales?’, Société d'Ethnologie, Conférence Eugène Fleischmann iii, Nanterre, pp. 27–8.Google Scholar
Carranza, N. (1974) Monsignor Gaspare Cerati, provveditore dell'Università di Pisa nel Settecento delle riforme. Pise: Pacini.Google Scholar
Coppini, R.P. (1985) ‘Bernardo Tanucci e Antonio Niccolini: una corrispondenza ritrovata’, Boll. Stor. Pisano, LIV: 155–69.Google Scholar
Coulaud, M. (1981) ‘Les Mémoires sur la matière étymologique de Charles de Brosses’, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, CXCIX: 287–352.Google Scholar
David, M. (1974) ‘Histoire des religions et philosophie au XVIIIe siècle: le président de Brosses, David Hume et Diderot’, Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger, CLXIV: 145–60.Google Scholar
De Brosses, Ch. (1991) Lettres familières [sic], ed. Cafasso, G., preface G. Macchia, 3 vols. Naples: Centre Jean Bérard.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M. (1988) ‘La République des Lettres’, Diogène, 143: 131–40.Google Scholar
Lough, J. (1985) ‘Reflections on Enlightenment and Lumières’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, VIII: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, D.M. (2001) Enemies of the Enlightenment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. (2003) ‘Defenders of Truth’, The Times Literary Supplement, 3 Jan, p. 29.Google Scholar
Musitelli, P. (2006) ‘Filippo Venuti, ami de Montesquieu et collaborateur de l'Edition lucquoise de l'Encyclopédie’, Dix-huitième siècle, XXXVIII: 429–48.Google Scholar
Niccolini, G. (1933) The Chronicles of a Florentine Family 1200-1470. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Passerini, L. (1870) Genealogia e Storia della Famiglia Niccolini. Firenze: Cellini.Google Scholar
Rosa, M. (1980) ‘Un “giansenista” difficile nell'Europa del '700’, in Mazzi, M. S., Raveggi, S. (eds), Studi di Storia Medievale e Moderna per Ernesto Sestan, pp. 761–91. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar