Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:19:53.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-Spaces of Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Ignacy Sachs
Ignacy Sachs*
Affiliation:
Ecole des hautes études en Sciences sociales, Paris
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In economic theory it is circumstances that dictate fashion. During the last quarter of the century, years marked by an unprecedented escalation of material production, economists of all persuasions, neoclassicals or Marxists, accorded an important place to theories of growth. Economic reductionism being fundamental, development was likened to growth, which tends to take pars pro toto and to ignore the difference between a necessary condition and a sufficient one. Suddenly economic theory, to which mechanical formalization would confer the appearance of an almost scientific rigour, became a powerful argument for the ideology of growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 28 , Issue 112 , December 1980 , pp. 75 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Amado, J., Stoffaes, C. 1980. “Vers une socio-économie duale?” in Commissariat Général du Plan, La Société française et la Technologie, p. 137–151, Paris, La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
Bahro, R. 1977. Die Alternative. Cologne/ Frankfurt, Europaische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Bataille, G. 1967. La Part maudite, Paris, Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1973. “Steps into the Ecology of Mind,” St. Albans, Paladin.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S., 1977. Economic Approach to Human Behaviour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.E., 1978. Ecodynamics: a new theory of social evolution, Beverly Hills, London, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Braudel, F., 1979. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XVe et XVIIIe siècles, t. 1 “Les structures du quotidien: le possible et l'impossible,” Paris, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Carlstein, T., Parkes, D., Thrift, N. (editors). 1978. Timing Space and Spacing Time, London, E. Arnold, 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Certeau, M., de. 1980. L'Invention du quotidien, Paris, Union générale d'édition, coll. 10/18.Google Scholar
Collective works, L'Homme malade du temps, 1979, Paris, Stock; Révolution du temps choisi, 1980, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1979. Life Chances: Approaches to Social and Political Theory, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Daly, H.E. 1977. Steady-State Economics, San Francisco, W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Dupuy, J.-P. 1975. Valeur sociale et encombrement du temps, Paris, C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. 1979. The World of Goods, New York, Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Faugère, J.P. 1980. “L'Allocation du temps entre travail domestique et travail marchand”, in Revue Economique n. 2, Vol. 31.Google Scholar
Fraser, J.T. (ed.). 1972. The Study of Time, Berlin, Springler Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giarini, O., Loubergue, H. 1979. La Civilisation technicienne à la dérive; dossier: “Les rendements décroissanrs de la technologie,” Paris, Dunod.Google Scholar
Goodman, P. and P. 1960 (1947). Communitas Means of Livelihood and Ways of Life. New York, Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gourou, P., 1973. Pour une géographie humaine, Paris Flammarion.Google Scholar
Grossin, W., 1974. Les Temps de la vie quotidienne, La Haye, Paris, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorn, G. 1980. “Daughters, Dress Shirts, Spotted Dick—Geoffrey Hawthorn writes about The World of Goods by Mary Douglas and Baron Isherwood,” The London Review of Books, 3 April 80.Google Scholar
Huber, J., 1980. “Social Ecology and Dual Economy,” IFDA Dossier 18, pp. 108–113.Google Scholar
I.F.D.A., 1980. Dossier 17, “Matériaux pour d'autres stratégies de développement”, Fondation Internationale Pour un Autre Développement, Nyon, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Illich, I. 1977. Disabling Profession, London, Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
Illich, I. 1979. The New Frontier for Arrogance: Colonization of the Informal Sector, addressed to the General Assembly of the Society for International Development, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 5 August 1979.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1973. “L'historien et l'homme quotidien,” in Mélanges en l'honneur de Fernand Braudel, tome 2, pp 233–243.Google Scholar
Lindner, S.B. 1970. The Harried Leisure Class, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Passet, R. 1979. L'Economique et le vivant, Paris, Payot.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as instituted process”, in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C.M., & Pearson, H.W. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Porebski, M. 1977. Ikonosfera, P.I.W., Warsaw.Google Scholar
Rossi, E. 1977. Abolire la miseria, Rome, Laterza.Google Scholar
Russell, B., s.d. In Praise of Idleness and Other Essays, New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sachs, I. 1978. “Civiltà”, in Enciclopedia, Turin, Einaudi, vol. III, p. 107–138.Google Scholar
Sachs, I. 1979. “Development, Maldevelopment and Industrialization of Third World Countries,” in Development and Change, vol. 10, pp. 635–646, London & Beverly Hills, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Sachs, I. 1980, Stratégies de l'Ecodéveloppement, Paris, Editions Economic et Humanisme et Les Editions ouvrières, coll. Développement et Civilisations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1976. The Use and Abuse of Biology: An Anthropological Critique of Sociobiology. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, F. 1976. The Joyless Economy—An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szczepanski, J. 1977. “Rola i cechy konsumcji w rozwinietym spoleczenstwie socjalistycnym “, Polska 2000, pp. 169–175, January 1977.Google Scholar
Thuillier, G. 1977. Pour une histoire du quotidien au XIXe siècle en Nivernais, Paris-La Haye, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeil, G. 1976. La Fatigue à l'école, Paris, E.S.F.Google Scholar
What Now?, 1975, Dag Hammarskjöld Report on Development and International Cooperation, prepared for the seventh special session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology; a New Synthesis, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woods, S. 1975. The Man in the Street: a Polemic on the Urbanism, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books.Google Scholar