Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:20:30.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The State, the Temple and the “Divine Slave”

Institutional Transformation and Microhistory in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Jackie Assayag
Jackie Assayag*
Affiliation:
Center for Indian and East Asian Studies, Paris
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Long considered to be institutions outside of time, the temples of India are today the subject of ethno-historical studies that attempt to establish their continuous and recent transformations. Recent monographs, based especially on relationships between the central government and local authorities, reconstruct by periods their medieval, modern and present history, that is the long destiny of constant restructuring over time (Appadurai 1981; Fuller 1984; Reiniche 1989), showing that temples, whether large or small, never ceased being the center of important conflicts between social groups seeking dominance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 38 , Issue 152 , December 1990 , pp. 73 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Appadurai, A., “Kings, Sects and Temples in South India, 1350-1700 A.D.”, in Burton, S., ed., South Indian Temples. An Analytical Reconsideration, New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House, 1978.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. Worship and Conflict under Colonial Rule. A South Indian Case, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. and Breckenbridge, C.A., “The South Indian Temple: Authority, Honour and Redistribution”, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 1976, 10, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assayag, J. Religion et société chez les Lingāyat-Viraśaiva de l'Ihde du Sud, Paris X Nanterre, unpublished thesis, 1983.Google Scholar
Assayag, J. “Modernisation de la caste et indianisation de la démocratie: le cas des Lingāyat”. Archives européennes de sociologie, 1986, XXVII, 2, 319–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assayag, J. “The Basket, Hair, the Goddess and the World. An Essay on South Indian Symbolism”, Diogènes 1988, 142, 113–144.Google Scholar
Assayag, J. “Sacrifice et Violence. Les genres de la possession dans le Karnataka “, Nouvelle revue d'ethnopsychiatrie, 1989 a, 13, 131–158.Google Scholar
Assayag, J. “Women-goddess, women-distress. Yellamma goddess's devotees in South India (Karnataka)”, Man in India, 1989b, 69, 4, 359–373.Google Scholar
Assayag, J. “Tocqueville chez Kipling. De la démocratie en Inde—Tradition et Modernité”, Archives des sciences sociales des religions, 1989c, 67, 1, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C.J., “Temples and Political Development”, in Baker, C.J. and Wash-brook, D.A., eds., South India: Political Institutions and Political Change 1880-1940, Delhi, Macmillan, 1975, 69–97.Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, S.M., Hindu Places of Pilgrimage in India (A Study in Cultural Geography), Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, SAGE Publications, 1973.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. “L'Illusion biographique”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1986, 62–72.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. Choses dites, Paris, Éditions de Minuit, 1987.Google Scholar
Bradford, N.J., “Transgenderism and the Cult of Yellamma: Heat, Sex and Sickness in South India Ritual”, Journal of Anthropological Research, 1983, 39, 3, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckenbridge, C.A., “From Protector to Litigant—Changing Relations Between Hindu Temples and the Rajah of Ramnad”, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 1977, 14, 1, 75–106.Google Scholar
Dirks, N.B., The Hollow Crown. Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., Ainsi pensent les Institutions, Paris, Éditions Usher, 1989 (1st English edition, 1986).Google Scholar
Dumont, L., Homo hierarchicus. Essai sur le système des castes, Paris, Gallimard, 1966.Google Scholar
Fuller, C.J., “The Attempted Reform of South Indian Temple Hinduism”, in Davis, J., ed., Religious Organization and Religious Experience, London, Academic Press, 1982, 153–167.Google Scholar
Davis, J. Servants of the Goddess. The Priests of a South Indian Temple, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Galey, J.C., “Reconsidering Kinship in India: An Ethnological Perspective”, in Galey, J.C., ed., Kinship and the Kings. History and Anthropology, vol. 4, Cambridge, Harwood Academic Publisher, 1989, 123–187.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., Le Fromage et les Vers: l'univers d'un meunier du XVIIe siècle, Paris, Flammarion, 1988 (1st Italian edition, 1985).Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. Mythes. Emblèmes, Traces. Morphologie et Histoire, Paris, Flammarion, 1989, (1st Italian edition, 1986).Google Scholar
Gold, A.G., Journeys, Fruitful. The Way of Rajasthani Pilgrims, Berkeley and Los Angeles, SAGE Publications, 1988.Google Scholar
Goswamy, B.B. and Morab, S.G., Chamundesvari Temple in Mysore (Anthropological Survey of India), Calcutta, Shri Dhirendra Nath Bera, Teacher Book Stall, 1975.Google Scholar
Gurumurthy, K.G., Indian Peasantry, Delhi, B.R. Publishing Corporation, 1982.Google Scholar
Heesterman, J.C., The Ancient Royal Consecration, The Hague, Mouton, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inden, , “Orientalist Construction of India”, Modern Asian Studies, 1986, 20, 3, 101–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishwaran, K.A., A Populistic Community and Modernization in India, Delhi, Vikas Publishing House, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishwaran, K.A. Religion and Society Among the Lingāyats of South India, Leyden-New Delhi, Brill & Vikas Publishing House, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersenboom, K., Nityasumangāli: Toward the Semiosis of the Deva-Dāsī Tradition of South India, Utrecht, Ph. D., Rijksuniversiteit, 1984.Google Scholar
Levi, G., “Les usages de la biographie”, Annales, E.S.C. (Nov./Dec.) 1989, 1325–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, G. Le Pouvoir au village. Histoire d'un exorciste dans le Piémont du XVIIe siècle, Paris, Gallimard, 1990.Google Scholar
Maccormack, W., “Lingāyat as a Sect”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1963, 93, 1, 59–71.Google Scholar
Manor, J., “Structural Changes in Karnataka Politics”, Economic and Political Weekly, 29 Oct. 1977, 1865–1869.Google Scholar
Manor, J. Political Change in an Indian State. Mysore 1917-1955, New Delhi, South Asia Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Marglin, F.A., Wives of the God-King. The Ritual of the Devadasis of Puri, Delhi, Oxford Unversity Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Morinis, , Pilgrimage in the Hindu Tradition. A Case Study of West Bengal, Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mudaliar, C.Y., The Secular State and Religious Institutions in India. A Study of the Administration of Hindu Public Religious Trusts in Madras, Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
Nandimath, S.C., A Handbook of Virasaivism, Dharwar, The Literary Committee L.E. Association, 1942.Google Scholar
Parvathamma, M.C., Sociological Essays on Veerasaivism, Bombay, Popular Prakashan, 1972.Google Scholar
Patil, B.A., “The Jogati”, Man in India, 1977, 57, 1, 23–43.Google Scholar
Pouchepadass, J., “Politique, religion et société en Inde. Une approche ethno-historique “, L'Homme, 1990, 114, XXX (2), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presler, F.A., Religion under Bureaucracy. Policy and Administration for Hindu Temples in South India, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Punekar, S.D., and Rao, K., A Study of Prostitution in Bombay Karnataka, Bombay, Lalwani Publishing House, 1967.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P., Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco, Berkeley-Los Angeles, SAGE Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
Reiniche, M.L., “Le Temple dans la localité. Quatre exemples au Tamilnadu”, Purusārtha, 8, L'espace du Temple, 1985, 75–117.Google Scholar
Reiniche, M.L. La configuration sociologique du Temple hindou. Tirunavannamalai, un lieu saint śivaïte du sud de l'Inde, Paris, École française d'Extrême-Orient, 1989.Google Scholar
Revel, J., “L'histoire au ras du sol”, Preface to Levi, G., Le Pouvoir au village, Paris, Gallimard, 1990, I–XXXIII.Google Scholar
Saïd, E., L'Orientalisme, . L'Orient créé par l'Occident, Paris, Le Seuil, 1980.Google Scholar
Shankar, J., Cult, Devadāsī. A Sociological Analysis, New Delhi, Ashish Publishing House, 1990.Google Scholar
Shankari, U., “Brahmin, King and bhakta in a Temple in Tamil Nadu”, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 1984, 18, 2, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, A., “The Hindu Temple Dancer: Prostitute or Nun?”, Cambridge Anthropology, 1983, 8, 1, 73–99.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. “Reform and Revival: The Devadāsī and her Dance”, Political and Economic Weekly, 1985, XX, 44 (Nov. 2), 1869–1876.Google Scholar
Stein, B., ed., South Indian Temples. An Analytical Reconstruction, New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House, 1978.Google Scholar
Stein, B. Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India, Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Thimmaaiah, G., and Aziz, A., “The Political Economy of Land Reforms in Karnataka, a South Indian State”, Asian Survey, 1983, XXIII, 7, 810–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar