Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T07:23:26.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small Séances with a Great Nganasan Shaman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Evgeny A. Helimsky  and
Nadezhda T. Kosterkina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The characteristic features of Siberia - its vast, sparsely settled expanses, its small population and harsh climate - apply particularly to the region inhabited by the Nganasan people, the most northerly of Eurasia. Their language belongs to the Samoyed branch of the Uralian linguistic group. They live in isolation and in precarious living conditions on the Taimyr archipelago, dispersed over an immense territory (200,000 square kilometers) that they have settled extremely sparsely (the entire population seems to have hardly ever exceeded one thousand). This circumstance, which explains their relative social and economic stagnation, has also marked Nganasan culture, favoring the retention of specifically Siberian elements, notably the role of shamanism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 40 , Issue 158 , June 1992 , pp. 39 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Castren, M.A., and Lehtisalo, T., Samojedische Volksdichtung. Helsinki, 1940.Google Scholar
Dobzhanskaya, O.E., “Melodika nganskikh kengersya,” Muzilal'naya entongrofiya Severnoi Azii. Novosibirsk, 1988, 76–85.Google Scholar
Dolgikh, B.O., and Faynberg, L.A., “Taymirskiye nganasany,” Trudy instituta etnografii, t. 56. 1969, 9–62.Google Scholar
Gracheva, G.N., 1960, “Shamany u nganasan,” Problemy istorii obshchestvennogo soznaniya aborigenov Sibirii. Leningrad, 1981, 69–89.Google Scholar
Gracheva, G.N., Traditsonnoye mirovozrenniya okhotnikov Taimyra. Leningrad, 1983.Google Scholar
Helimsky [Khelimsky], E.A., “Octosyllabic and hexasyllabic verse in Northern Samoyed,” Congressus septimus inernationalis fenno-ugristarum 2A, Linguitica. Debrecen, 1990, 75.Google Scholar
Helimsky [Khelimsky], E.A. “Does the language of the spirits influence the development of human language? (Evidence from Northern Samoyed).” Text read at the First International Conference on Sharnanism, Seoul, 1991.Google Scholar
Khelimsky, E.A., “Russkyi govorka mesto kazat' budem (Taymirskyi pidzhin).” Vozniknoveniye i funcktsionirovaniye knotanktnykh yazykov: materialy rabochego soveshchaniya. Moscow, 1987, 84–93.Google Scholar
Khelimsky, E.A.,Sillabika Texta v nganasanskikh inoskazatel'nikh pes'nyakh,” Muzikal'naya etnografiya Severnoi Azii, Novosibirsk, 1988, 52–76.Google Scholar
Khelimsky, E.A.,Glubinn-fonologicheskyi izosillabism nenetskogo stikha.” Journal de la société finno-ougrienne, 82, 1989, 223–268.Google Scholar
Lehtisalo, T., Entwurf einer Mythologie der Jurak-Samojeden. Helsinki, 1924. — Jurak-samojedische Volksdichtung. Helsinki, 1947.Google Scholar
Middendorf, A.F., Puteshestviye na sever i vostok Sibirii II. Saint-Pétersbourg, 1878.Google Scholar
Popov, A.A., Tavgiitsy. Moscow-Leningrad, 1936.Google Scholar
Middendorf, A.F. Nganasany. Social'noe ustroyistvo i verovaniya. Leningrad, 1984. Simchenko, Yu. B., Kul'tura okhotnikov na oleneyi Severnoi Evrazii. Moscow, 1976.Google Scholar
Tretyiakov, P.I., “Turukhanskyi krai, ego priroda i zhitelyi,” Zapiski Russkogo Geographicheskogo obshchestvo po obshcheyi geografii II. Saint Pétersbourg, 1869, 215–530.Google Scholar