Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:12:53.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Semiology of the Sign System Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Georges Mounin
Georges Mounin*
Affiliation:
Université d'Aix-en-Provence

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the last twenty years Luis Prieto, in his published work in French, has reiterated that the systematic study of the codes (other than natural languages) which were invented by men for communication purposes is in and of itself an undertaking essential for an understanding of both the laws of communication in general and of the mechanisms of these systems of communication—the totality of which would make up the (Saussurian) semiology of communication (Prieto 1966, 1968, 1975). Among these systems the symbols of chemistry—referred to as such for a long time— and their combinatory rules constitute a very ancient code or series of codes (Crosland, 1962). Up to now this code has not been subjected to a genuine semiological study, except for the essay by Dagognet (1969, see Mounin 1970) which is more literary or poetical and metaphysical than scientific.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 29 , Issue 113-114 , March 1981 , pp. 216 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Cherry, C., 1957. On Human Communication, New York: Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
Cohen, M., 1947. Faits linguistiques et faits de pensée, Journal de Psychologie, n. 400.Google Scholar
Crosland, M. P., 1962. Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry, London, Melbourne, Toronto: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Dagognet, F., 1969. Tableaux et langages de la chimie. Ed. du Seuil.Google Scholar
François, F., 1968. Description in Le Langage. Encyclopédic de la Pléiade, Gallimard, p. 11.Google Scholar
Gardies, J.-L., 1975. Esquisse d'une grammaire pure. Vrin, p. 8, note 2.Google Scholar
Gardner, R., 1969. Teaching Sign-Language to a Chimpanzee, Science, Vol. 165, n. 3894, 15 August 1969, p. 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiraud, P., 1963, Études de linguistique appliquée, Vol. 2, p. 37.Google Scholar
Martinet, A., 1960. Éléments de linguistique générate. A. Colin.Google Scholar
Martinet, A., 1960. Ibid., p. 13.Google Scholar
Mestrallet, R., 1980. Communication, linguistique et sémiologie: contribution à l'étude de la sémiologie, étude sémiologique des systèmes de signes de la chimie. Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, 2 vol. 501 p.Google Scholar
Mounin, G., 1968a, Clefs pour la linguistique. Seghers.Google Scholar
Mounin, G., 1968b, Ferdinand de Saussure. Seghers.Google Scholar
Mounin, G., 1970. Introduction à la sémiologie. Ed. de Minuit, p. 149–154.Google Scholar
Mounin, G., 1975. Linguistique et philosophie. Presses Universitaires de France, p. 98.Google Scholar
Mounin, G., 1979. Éléments d'une sémantique structurale et fonctionnelle: L'axiologie d'André Martinet in Linguistique fonctionnelle, débats et perspectives, présentés par Mortéza Mahmoudian. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Premack, D., 1971. Language in Chimpanzee, Science, Vol. 172, p. 808–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., 1972. Teaching Language to an Ape, Scientific American, Vol. 227, n. 4, October, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, L. J., 1966. Messages et signaux. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Prieto, L. J., 1968. Sémiologie in Le Langage. Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Prieto, L. J., 1975. Pertinence et pratique. Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
Tchekhoff, C., 1971. Les formations savantes gréco-latines en français, anglais, italien, espagnol, allemand et russe, La Linguistique, Vol. 7, 2, p. 35–54.Google Scholar