Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:04:43.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantics and Neurology: Neuronal Man and Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Georges Mounin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Jean-Pierre Changeux's Neuronal Man attempts to define mental activity, that is thought, with respect to the neurophysiology of the brain.*

Since antiquity, the historical account of these problems has undergone the examination of classical notions: what is a mental image, a concept, a representation? Changeux, who accepts these traditional points of departure, as well as the notion of signification, aims to clarify the physical, neurophysiological counterparts of these notions, in order to arrive at less simplistic terms: image de memoire “memory image,” later - objet mental “mental object,” and still later - objet de mémoire “memory object.” Behind these terms lies transition to neurophysiology, with the notion of engram, and finally with the notion of trace, a notion which is precise but very general, since the substantive reality of these traces, their anatomy and physiology in the brain has yet to be determined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 40 , Issue 157 , March 1992 , pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Bally, Charles, Traité de Stylistique française (2nd ed.), Paris: Klincksieck 1930.Google Scholar
Bidu-Vranceanu, Angela, “Une modalité de description paradigmatique au niveau du lexique,” Revue roumaine de linguistique, 6, 1970. This article is the first of a series of notable works on the semantic structure of the color terms in Romanian.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Léonard, Language, 1933 (French trans.: Le Langage, Paris: Payot 1970).Google Scholar
Bonnet, Clairelise, L'Enfant et le Symbolique, Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin 1980.Google Scholar
Broca, Paul, Bulletin de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris, Paris: Masson, 1st series, vol. II (1861) and VI (1865).Google Scholar
Buyssens, Éric. “Le structuralisme et l'arbitraire du signeo,” Studii si cercetári lingvistici, 3, 1960.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, New Haven: Yale University Press 1953-1957.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Language and Mind, New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1968 (French trans.: Le Langage et la Pensée, Paris: Payot 1970).Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo, Leibniz, Language, Signs and Thought, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, De, Tullio, Senso e significato, Bari: Adriatica 1971.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, Cinq Leçons sur la psychanalyse, Paris: Payot 1989 (1910).Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis, Prolégomènes, Paris: Ed. de Minuit, 1969 (new ed. 1971).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Child language, aphasia and phonological universals, The Hague: Mouton 1968 (French translation, Langage enfantin, aphasie et lois phonétiques générales, Paris: Ed. de Minuit 1969).Google Scholar
Lhermitte, F., Tissot, R., Mounin, G., L' Agrammatisme, Brussels: Dessart 1973.Google Scholar
Martin, Pierre, Cerveau et Langage, Quebec: Université Laval, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Martinet, , André, “Connotation, poésie et culture,” in To Honor Roman Jacobson, The Hague: Mouton 1966.Google Scholar
Mestrallet, Renée, Communication, linguistique et sémiologie: contribution à l'étude de la sémiologie, étude sémiologique des systèmes de signes de la chimie, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona 180, reviewed by Mounin, Georges, “Une sémiologie du système des signes de la chimie,” Diogène, no.114, April - June 1981.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, “The Semiologies of Literary Texts,” in Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, vol. II, The Hague: Mouton 1982.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Clefs pour la sémantique, Paris: Seghers 1979.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Poésie et Société, Paris, P.U.F. 1962. Spanish trans.: “Editorial Nova,” Buenos Aires, 1964; Portuguese trans.: “Collecçao Conhencimiento,” Lisbon, Unio Grafica, no date; Slovak trans.: 1968; Japanese trans.: 1969; Italian trans.: 1985; Czech trans.: 1990.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Les problèmes théoriques de la traduction, Paris: N.R.F., “Bibliothèque des Idées,” 1963. Spanish trans.: Madrid, Editorial Gredos 1971; Luso-Brazilian trans.: São Paulo 1975; Japanese trans.: Tokyo, Ashi Shuppansa 1980; Greek trans.: Athens, National Bank Cultural Foundation 1984.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, La linguistique du XXe siècle, Paris: P.U.F. 1972. Portuguese trans.: Lisbon: Editorial Presença & Brasil Livraria Martino Fontes 1973; Italian trans.: Milan: Feltrinelli 1974; Spanish trans.: Madrid: Editorial Gredos 1977; Japanese trans.: Ilakusinsha, no date [1974].Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Linguistique et Philosophie, Paris, P.U.F. 1975. Spanish trans.: Madrid: Editorial Gredos 1979; Serbo-Croatian trans.: Belgrade 1981.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges, Sept poètes et le langage (Mallarmé, Valéry, Breton, Éluard, Ponge, Char, Hugo), Paris: Gallimard 1992.Google Scholar
Pottier, Bernard, Linguistique générale, Paris: Klincksieck 1977.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., “Cognitive reference points,” Cognit. Psychol., 7, 1975, 532–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de, Cours de linguistique générale, Paris: Payot 1916; Mauro, Tullio De, ed., Corso di linguistica generale [di F. de S.], Bari: Laterza 1967. This edition is expanded with numerous notes.Google Scholar
Watson, J.B., “Psychology as the behaviorist views it,” Psychol. Rev., 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar