Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:39:49.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review Essay: The ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism' 50 Years On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Paolo Parrini
Paolo Parrini*
Affiliation:
University of Florence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This chronicle is a review of a collective publication commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of W. V. O. Quine’s most influential paper. The author, a prominent epistemologist, discusses these contributions in a way that sheds a particular light on the importance of Quine’s work for the ongoing epistemological debate.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 91 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © UNESCO 2007

References

Boghossian, Paul (1996) ‘Analyticity Reconsidered’, Noûs, 30: 360–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950) ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’, Revue international de philosophie, 4: 20–40.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan (1987) ‘The Importance of Quine’, London Times Literary Supplement, November.Google Scholar
Glock, H.-J., Glüer, K. and Keil, G., eds (2003) Fifty Years of Quine's ‘Two Dogmas'. Grazer Philosophische Studien: Internationale Zeitschrift für analytische Philosophie, Vol. 66. Amsterdam/New York: Editions Rodopi BV.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul and Strawson, Peter F. (1956) ‘In Defense of a Dogma ’, Philosophical Review, 65: 141–58.10.2307/2182828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, David (1961) ‘Analytic Truths’, Mind, 65: 359–67.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, David (1966) ‘On Necessary Truths’, Mind, 70: 514–25.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1953) Interpretation and Preciseness. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur (1958) Semantics and Necessary Truth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur (1946) The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: Russell & Russell, edn 1968.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1962) ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic’, in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol III: Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, pp. 358–97. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1935) ‘Truth by Convention’, in Lee, O.H. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead, pp. 90–124. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1951) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, Philosophical Review, 60(January): 20–43.10.2307/2181906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1953) ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, edn 1961.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1954) ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, Synthese, 12: 350–74.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1960) Word and Object. Boston, MA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1970) Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar