Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:29:54.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rethinking the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Marietta Stepanyants*
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Basing herself on Indian and Chinese traditions, the author provides arguments in favour of revising the customary understanding of philosophy per se. The nonexistence of uniformity in the methods of cognition cannot be taken as evidence for the phenomenon of ‘philosophy’ missing outside the Western world. In the East, one can witness fidelity to the broad interpretation of ‘philosophy’, etymologically much nearer to this concept, presuming, along with rationality, the authority of other sources of knowledge. Philosophy came into the world not once but a number of times and in various places. From the outset it bore out, along with common generic traits, its specific ‘patrimonial’ characteristics; in other words, those revealing its own culture. In its turn, each culture is built up around a certain ‘frame’ made up of universal conceptual constituents. The history of philosophy would remain incomplete and one-sided (with a ‘Western bias’) until it ignores the fundamental universals of other cultures. Even the universals and values recognized as common to all mankind are frequently imbued with basically different substance depending on a context of relevant culture. The reappraisal of the history of philosophy should make the teaching system of philosophy multicultural.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2009

References

Ames, R. & Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998) The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Goldziher, I. (1910) , in Vedenskij, A., Radov, E. (eds), . St. Petersburg: Obschestvennaya polza, t.1, pp. 81108.Google Scholar
Grube, W. (1910) ‘’, in A. Vedenskij, E. Radov (eds), . St. Petersburg: Obschestvennaya polza, t.1, pp. 4362.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1996). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol. 1. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Hesse, H. (1986) ‘An meine Leser in Japan’ (May 1955), in Gesammelte Briefe, IV (1949-1962). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 234235.Google Scholar
Kobzev, A.I. (1994) . Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1968) ‘Lettre sur la philosophie chinoise à Nicolas de Rémond’ in G.W. Leibniz, Zwei Briefe über das Binare Zahlensystem und die chinesische Philosophie. Stuttgart: Belser-Presse.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1977) ‘Lettre à Nicolas de Rémond’ in Mungello, D.E., Leibniz and Confucianism. The Search for Accord. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, M.F. (1919) The Six Systems of Indian Philosophy. Varanasi: The Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.Google Scholar
Nasr, S.H. (1968) Science and Civilization in Islam. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oldenberg, H. (1910) ‘’, in A. Vedenskij, E. Radov (eds),. St. Petersburg: Obschestvennaya polza, t.1, pp. 2939.Google Scholar
Patañjali, (1966) The Yoga System of Patañjali or the Ancient Hindu Doctrine of Concentration of Mind, Harvard Oriental Series, trans. Woods, J. H.. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.Google Scholar
Perelomov, L.S. (1993) , Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Raud, R.Philosophies versus Philosophy: In Defense of a Flexible Definition’, Philosophy East & West 56(4): 625660.Google Scholar
Shekhawat, V. (1992) ‘Specific Cultures and Coexistence of Alternative Rationalities: a Case Study of the Contact of Indian and Greco-European Cultures’, Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 9 (2): 125134.Google Scholar
Shokhin, V.K. (1988) ‘’, in Stepaniants, M. (ed.), . Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Solomon, R.C. and Higgins, K.M. (1966) A Short History of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stepin, V.S. (2001) ‘’, in Stepin, V., Guseinov, A., Semigin, G. and Ogurtsov, A. (eds), t. 4. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Tch’ouen ts’iou and Tso tchouan (1951) Chronique de la principauté de Lou, trans. Couvreur, Séraphin. Paris: Cathasia.Google Scholar
The New Encyclopedia Britannica (1973- 1974). Chicago: Helen Hemingway Benton Publishers.Google Scholar