Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T14:08:17.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Evolution and Creation: the Afro-Brazilian Cults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiroz
Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiroz*
Affiliation:
University of Sao Paulo

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the end of the 19th century, Brazilian researchers have speculated about the phenomenon of ethnic coexistence they have witnessed in their country. How may the mixed culture that is its obvious result be explained? Should it be attributed to some sociocultural syncretism, to an interpenetration of civilizations or, quite simply, to a synthesis? Whatever the case, it is certain that cultural elements of very different origins became united in Brazil and that they have remained closely associated there in spite of their disparity. The best example of this “cultural conglomerate,” if we may call it that, is without a doubt that of the Afro-Brazilian religious cults and, although numerous studies have already been devoted to them, they have a richness of content and meaning, plus a capacity for renewal, that is far from being exhaustively investigated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 29 , Issue 115 , September 1981 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Footnotes

*

A communication presented to the Dialogue-Congress Western Europe/Latin America, organized by Osterreichisches College, June 24-29, 1979, Alpbach, Austria.

References

de Azevedo, Thales, Les Elites de couleur dans une ville brésilienne, Paris, Unesco, Col. Race et Société, 1953.Google Scholar
Bastide, R., “Contribution à l'étude de la participation,” Paris, Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, No. XIV, 1953.Google Scholar
Bastide, R. “ Le principe de coupure et le comportement afro-brésilien,” S. Paulo, Anais do XXXI congresso internacional des americanistes, 1955.Google Scholar
Bastide, R.Sociologie du Brésil, Paris, C.D.U., Institut des hautes études de l'Amérique latine, 1954.Google Scholar
Bastide, R.Le Candomblé de Bahia (rite nagô), La Haye, Mouton et cie., 1958.Google Scholar
Bastide, R. Les Religions africaines du Brésil, Paris, P.U.F., 1960.Google Scholar
Bastide, R.Images du Nordeste mystique en noir et blanc, Pandora Editions, 1978.Google Scholar
Peter, Fry, “Manchester, sec. XIX S. Paulo, sec. XX: dois movimentes religiosos,” Religião e Sociedade, No. 3, October, 1978.Google Scholar
Goulart, Mauricio, Escravidão africana no Brasil, S. Paulo, Ed. Alfa-Omega, 1975.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Marie, Processus d'industrialisation et développement énergétique du Brésil, Paris, Institut des hautes études de l'Amérique latine, 1960.Google Scholar
Monbeig, Pierre, Pionniers et planteurs de S. Paulo, Paris, Libr. Armand Colin, 1952.Google Scholar
Morazé, Charles, Les Trois Ages du Brésil, Paris, Libr. Armand Colin, 1954.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Renato, “Du syncrétisme à la synthèse-Umbanda, une religion brésilienne,” Paris, Archives des sciences sociales des religions, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1975.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Renato “ Religious Matrifocality,” Diogenes, No. 105, Spring, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira de Queiroz, M.I., “Collectivités noires et montée socio-économique des noirs au Brésil,” Toulouse, Caravelle (Cahiers du Monde Hispanique et Luso-Brésilien), No. 22, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira de Queiroz, M.I.” Principe de participation et principe de coupure: la contribution de Roger Bastide à leur définition sociologique,” Paris, Archives des sciences sociales des religions, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1979, a.Google Scholar
Pereira de Queiroz, M.I. “ Bresil, XIX siècle: les précurseurs des sciences sociales,” in Culture, science et développement, mélanges en l'honneur de Charles Morazé, Toulouse, Private Ed., 1979.Google Scholar
Teixeira, D. Monteiro, “Churches, Sects and Agencies: Aspects of Popular Ecumenism,” Diogenes, No. 100, Winter 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar