Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T15:43:06.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on Cultural Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Kwasi Wiredu*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, Tampa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A dialectical interaction exists between cultural unity and diversity. These two factors can operate for good or ill. In order to strengthen the positive factor and limit the negative, it is important to have a good conceptual grasp of the basis of the unity, as well as of the diversity of cultures. Such an understanding should facilitate dialogue in intercultural relations, dialogue that is the most rational of all ways of coexistence. This article aims to explore the underlying conceptual themes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2005

References

Gensler, Harry (1990) Symbolic Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (1991) ‘Morality and Religion in Akan Thought’, in Norm Allen, Jr (ed.) African American Humanism. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (1996a) Cultural Universals and Particulars: An African Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (1996b) ‘Death and the Afterlife in African Culture’, in Wiredu, Kwasi and Gyekye, Kwame (eds) Ghanaian Philosophical Studies I. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (1999) ‘Society Democracy in Africa’, New Political Science 21(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (2001a) ‘Tradition, Democracy and Political Legitimacy’, in Kurimoto, Eisei (ed.) Rewriting Africa: Towards Renaissance or Collapse? Osaka: The Japan Center for Area Studies.Google Scholar
Wiredu, Kwasi (2001b) ‘Democracy by Consensus: Some Conceptual Considerations’, Philosophical Papers 30(3), November (Rhodes University, South Africa).Google Scholar