Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:15:49.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy of Nothingness and Process Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Yutaka Tanaka
Yutaka Tanaka*
Affiliation:
Sophia University
*
Yutaka Tanaka, Sophia University, 7-1 Kioi-cho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper discusses the two representative philosophers of the Kyoto School, Kitaro Nishida and Hajime Tanabe from the perspective of process theology and the Buddhist-Christian dialogue in Japan.

The first chapter explicates Nishida’s concept of “pure experience” in comparison with William James’ radical empiricism and with Kant’s dualism of sense and reason. Pure experience in Nishida’s sense is neither a passive reception of objective sense-data given before subjective mental operations, nor the raw material of experience which must be given “form” by experiencing subject. It is nothing but metaphysically ultimate activity from which both the experiencing subject and the whole range of the experienced objects from sense-perception to intellectual intuition emerge as its self-unfolding.

The second and third chapters discuss the two key concepts of process theology, “concrescence” and “the extensive continuum” with a special reference to the Mahayana Buddhist concept of “emptiness (sunyata)” and “dependent arising (pratityasamutpada)”. Nishida’s tripartite concept of topos, i.e. a topos of relative being, a topos of relative nothingness, and the topos of absolute nothingness will be applied to process theology in order to explicate the relation of two ultimates in Whitehead’s metaphysics, i.e. the relation of God as the religious ultimate to creativity as the metaphysical ultimate.

The fourth and fifth chapters discuss Hajime Tanabe as a critical successor of Nishida’s philosophy of Nothingness. Tanabe is more akin to Whitehead than to Nishida in that Tanabe reformulates Nishida’s concept of Nothingness from the temporal perspective of a finite human existence related essentially to “species” or “society” in the historical world. Tanabe transforms the unity of contradictories in the logic of topos into the contrasted opposites in the historical process of becoming, which involves novelty and discontinuous leaps at points of historical crisis. For him history has become “the overall Koan” in which the metaphysical topology of static being is to be superseded by the innovative principle of nothingness in the historical world.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 3: Japanese Philosophy Today , August 2010 , pp. 20 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2011

References

NW: 西田幾多郎全集 [] (1949). Tōkyō: 岩波書店.Google Scholar
TW: 田辺元全集 [] (1964). Tōkyō: 筑摩書房.Google Scholar
NKW: 西谷啓治著作集 [] (1986). Tōkyō: 創文社.Google Scholar
PM: Tanabe, H (1986) Philosophy as Metanoetics. Translated by Yoshinori, T with Viglielmo, V and Heisig, JW. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
PR: Whitehead, AN (1978) Process and Reality: an Essay in Cosmology. Corrected edition, edited by Griffin, DR, Sherburne, DW. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
CN: Whitehead, AN (1964) The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
AI: Whitehead, AN (1961) Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
SMW: Whitehead, AN (1925) Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cobb, JB (1982) Beyond Dialogue: Toward a Mutual Transformation of Christianity and Buddhism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, JB (1990) Response to Ueda. Unpublished paper presented at the Meeting of the American Academy of Religion.Google Scholar
Hakari, Y (1990) 宗教哲学としてのカント哲学. Tōkyō: 勁草書房.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M (1962) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Translated into English by Churchill, JS. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kalupahana, DJ (1986) Nagarjuna. The Philosophy of the Middle Way. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, H (1980) 龍樹. Tōkyō: 講談社.Google ScholarPubMed
Nobo, JL (1986) Whitehead’s Metaphysics of Extension and Solidarity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Odin, S (1982) Process Metaphysics and Hua-yen Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H (1951) The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahasi, S (1932) 意識現象の事実と其意味. In 全体の立場. Tokyo: 岩波書店, 393–432.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Y (1963) The philosophy of Nishida Kitarō. Japanese Religion 3(4): 1–32.Google Scholar
Ueda, S (1991) 西田幾多郎の思想における経験と言葉の問題. 禅文化研究所紀要, 17.Google Scholar