Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:36:32.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Precision of Expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Adam Schaff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both in the case of colloquial language and in the case of specialized scientific language we always have to face the essential issue : what must we do in order not to be misled by an incorrect use of language? When we refer in general to being misled by some use of language we have two cases in mind: primo, when the language in question wrongly performs its communicative function so that the speaker is unable to convey his ideas to the listener, and, secundo, when the language by means of which we think imposes on us, through its structure and forms fixed by tradition (in the case of natural languages), incorrect ideas about reality (cf. the issues of hypostases). The causes of such and similar difficulties are varied. These difficulties, among other things, suggest the idea that language is not only an instrument, but also an object of research, an idea which induced twentieth century philosophers to engage in the study of language in its ontological, gnosiological, and methodological aspects. The method of semantic analysis, understood as a method of analysis of meanings of words, is directed precisely against these shortcomings of language. That method is meant to prevent semantic and logical errors that encumber the process of thinking with difficulties and hamper communication both with others and with oneself. Among other causes, these errors are due to the ambiguity and vagueness of words.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 9 , Issue 35 , September 1961 , pp. 34 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Black, Max, Vagueness (in Language and Philosophy), Cornell University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M., Artificial Languages, Language, Thought and Culture, The University of Michigan Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, Words and Things, London 1959.Google Scholar
Kubinski, T., “Nazwy nieostre" [Vague Names], Studia Logica, Vol. VII.Google Scholar
Russell, B., Whitehead, A.N., Principia Mathematica, Vol. I, “ Introduction,” Cambridge 1925.Google Scholar
Russell, B., “Vagueness,” Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B., The Philosophy of Logical Atomism; Logical Atomism; Logical Positivism (in Logic and Knowledge; Essays 1901-1950), London 1956.Google Scholar
Russell, B., An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, London 1940.Google Scholar
Russell, B., The Analysis of Mind, London 1921.Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F., An Introduction to Logical Theory, Methuen, London 1952.Google Scholar
Urmson, J.O., Philosophical Analysis, Oxford 1956.Google Scholar
Warnock, G.J., English Philosophy since 1900, Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London 1933.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, Oxford 1953.Google Scholar