No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Non- and Anti-Democratic in Post-Modernity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Is, or has, democracy a universal value? This is the main question raised by this paper, which distinguishes between two aspects of democracy: political institution in opposition to despotism, and political belief against any kind of slavery and subordination. The role played by intellectuals in the development of contemporary democracy, and the relation of democracy to mass culture and the influence of mass media on a true democratic attitude, are studied within the frame of an overall ‘mass aesthetization' which characterizes contemporary societies.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2008
References
Hallowell, John H. (1946) The Decline of Liberalism as an Ideology. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hallowell, John H. (1954) The Moral Foundation of Democracy. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1985) Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. by Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert (2003) Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre (1950) ‘Tyranny and Wisdom’, in Leo Strauss, On Tyranny. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Kenneth R. (2004) ‘Philosophic Roots, The Role of Leo Strauss, and the War in Iraq’, in Stelzer, Irwin (ed.), Neoconservatism. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
You have
Access