Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T09:53:42.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Necessity of Euphemism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Donald F. Miller*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Emile Benvcniste may be used to introduce the topic. The French linguist begins an essay on “Euphemisms Ancient and Modern” with a paradox about the early Greek definitions of euphemism. “To speak words which augur well” is one meaning given, but another is “to maintain silence”. This initial contradiction is further compounded by yet a third expression, “to shout in triumph”. The dilemma is, however, easily dissolved. To speak words which augur well implies, for special occasions, an exhortation even to shout triumphantly, “to assent by an, auspicious outcry”: it further implies, again depending on the circumstances, “to avoid words which augur ill”, hence, if necessary, to say nothing. As one definition explains “avoid all unlucky words during sacred rites: hence, as the surest mode of avoiding them, keep a religious silence” (original emphasis). Paradox terminates; we are merely dealing with “a euphemism for a euphemism” taking an expression of Benveniste out of context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Reference: Benveniste, E., Problems in General Linguistics, M.E.Meek (trans.) University of Miami Press, 1971Google Scholar