Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:22:10.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphor or Diaphor? On the Difference Particular To Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Andras Sandor
Andras Sandor*
Affiliation:
Howard University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The idea that language is metaphoric in nature has often been suggested or stated since Vico and Rousseau. Derrida, too, often writes about metaphor and the impression he gives is that he is arguing for the metaphoric nature of both thought, whether philosophic or not, and language. Interpreters like de Man or Culler have helped to spread this impression. If it is correct, Derrida shares a pan-metaphoric view of language and whatever can be made with it. It is useful to refer to Derrida's view because in my opinion he has been very good at saying what language is, even if he has been very much in the wrong in seeing no distinction between language and language use. Let us consider first what he has been good at.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 34 , Issue 134 , June 1986 , pp. 106 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Benveniste, Emile (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale I & II. Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl (1965) Sprachetheorie Stuttgart, Fischer.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind AND Ellis, John (1977) Language and Materialism. Developments in Semiology and the Theory of Subject. Boston, London and Henley, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan (1982) On Deconstruction. Theory and Criticism after Structuralism Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul (1983) Blindness and Insight. Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Second Edition, Revised. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1978) Writing and Difference, trans. Bass, Alan Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1981) Dissemination, trans. Johnson, Barbara. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1982) Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, Alan Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop (1982) The Great Code. The Bible and Literature San Diego, London, New York, Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Franck, Robert (1969) “Langue, discours et significations”, Revue philosophique de Louvain 67, 306–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1957) “Meaning”, The Philosophical Review 66, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. AND Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. (1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John (1977) Semantics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1960) Werke in drei Bänden, ed. Schlechta, , vol. 3. Munich, Hanser.Google Scholar
Nisin, Arthur (1960) La Littérature et le lecteur. Paris.Google Scholar
Platts, Platts Mark de (1979) Ways of Meaning. An Introduction to a Philosophy of Language. London, Boston and Henley, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Quine, Quine Willard van (1961) From a Logical Point of View. Logico-philosophical. Second ed. New York, Evanston, San Francisco, London, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ross, J.F. (1981) Portraying Analogy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandor, Andras (1982) “On Verbal Works”, The Eighth LACUS Forum 1981, ed. Gutwinski, Waldermar & Jolly, Grace. Columbia, S.C., Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1983) Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1962) Semantics. Oxford, Blackwell; New York, Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Wheelwright, Philip (1962) Metaphor and Reality. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar