Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:15:13.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Means and Ends in Psycholinguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At its birth, a new scientific discipline is baptized with the names of the two parent disciplines, Science X and Science Y. Subsequently, usage tends to shorten this compound name by giving preference to one or the other of the constituting terms so that the new term is less disconcerting and novel. Take biophysics, for example. Is it more closely related to physics than to biology, or the other way round? Today this question seems naive but it did not appear so a scarce thirty years ago, that is, at the beginning of the creative activity of the most, eminent scientists in the field of biophysics: it was then the subject of intense discussion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

1 Recognizing Patterns, ed. by P. Kolers and M. Den, Cambridge, Massachu setts, M.I.T. Press, 1963.

2 W.S. McCulloch, "Why the Mind Is In the Head," Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior, New York, Wiley, 1951.

3 Charles E. Osgood, "Where Do Sentences Come From," Semantics. An Interdisciplinary Reader, ed. by D. Steinberg and L. Jacobovitz, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1971, pp. 497-529.

4 "Analiz retchevykh signalov tchelovekom," Nauka, (Problemy fiziologitsche skoj akoustiki) Vol. VII, Leningrad, 1971.

5 G.A. Miller and P. Nicely, "Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants," JASA, 1959, Vol. 27, No. 2.

6 B. Malmberg, "Questions de méthode en phonétique synchronique," Studia linguistica, 1956, Vol. X, No. 1.

7 O.S. Koulaguina, "Ob odnom sposobe opredelenija grammatitcheskikh nonjatij na base teorii množestv," Problemy Kibernetiki, 1958, No. 1, pp. 203-214.

8 M.A. Schreider, "Složnye sistemy: Kosmologitcheskie printsipy," Sistemnzeiss ledovanija (annual pubblication) 1975, pp. 149-170.

9 L.A. Chistovitch, A.V. Ventsov, et. al., "Fisiologia retchi Vospriatie ret chi tchelovekom." Nauka, Leningrad, 1976.

10 N.S. Trubetskoy, Grundzüge der Phonologie, Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, VII, 1939.

11 R. Jacobson, G. Fant, M. Halle, Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates, M.I.T. Acoust. Lab. Techn. Rep., No. 13, 1955.

12 See Notes 4 and 9.

13 L.V. Scherba, "O trojakom aspecte jazykovikh javienij i ob eksperimente v jazykoznanij," (1931) in Scherba, "Jazykovaja sistema i retchevaya dejatel'nost'," Leningrad, Nauka, 1974, p. 24-39.

14 There is also a purely technical approach pertaining to the field of com munication engineering.

15 B. Vauquios, La Traduction automatique à Grenoble, Grenoble, Dumond, 1975.

16 O.S. Koulaguina, "Ob istorii i sovremennom sostojanii machinogo perevoda," Kibernetika, Kiev, 1976, No. 6, pp. 124-131.

17 P.L. Garvin, "Machine Translation in the Seventies," Papers in Computa tional Linguistics, Budapest, Akadémiai kiadó, 1976, pp. 445-459.

18 W. Weaver, "Translation," Machine Translation of Languages, ed. by W. Locke and A. Booth, New York, 1955.

19 T. Winograd, "Understanding Natural Language," Cognitive Psychology, 1973, Vol. III, No. 1.

20 Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, ed. by W. Weimer and D. Palermo, Hillsdale, Wiley, 1974.

21 N. Chomsky, "The Formal Nature of Language," Biological Foundations of Language, Appendix A, ed. by E. Lenneberg, New York, Wiley, 1967.

22 M.M. Bongard, Problema ouznavanija, Moscow, Fizmatgiz, 1967.

23 See A.A. Toom, "Nesimmetritcheskaja kommunikatsija, focalisatsija i ynpav lenije v igrakh," in Semiotika i informatika, No. 7, 1976, pp. 112-127.