Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:26:53.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Terror in the Age of Colonial Constitution Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Ranabir Samaddar
Ranabir Samaddar*
Affiliation:
Calcutta Research Group
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this exploration into the close relation between terror and law, I attempt first to show that the relation between terror and law is not a simple question of relating violence to law, but to the very process of constitution making. Second, laws relating to terror may or may not find a formal place in the constitution, but this relation is essential to the working of the basic law, of the foundational concept of the rule of law. Third, intelligence gathering occupies a key place in this relation, and this activity, which has no mention in the constitution almost anywhere in the world, is the fulcrum on which reasons of state stand. Fourth, intelligence is the close monitoring of human movement, of the body, of the physical activities, and in this physical form of politics we have the meeting of the body and reasoning, terror and constitution, violence and law. And finally, the article describes a specifically Indian experience; yet may have larger significance in terms of retrieving the history of constitution making.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 18 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2006

References

Bandopadhyay, Upendranath (1999) Nirbashiter Atmakatha (1921). Calcutta: National Publishers.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Paula (2002) ‘Aliens in the Colonial World’, in Samaddar, Ranabir (ed.), Refugees and the State. Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bhupendra nath Datta (s.d.) Aprakashito Rajnitik Itihas. Calcutta: Nababharat Publishers, reprint.Google Scholar
Datta, Bhupendra nath (1983) Bharater Dwitiya Swadhinata Sangram. Calcutta: Nababharat Publishers, reprint.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, trans. Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De, Amalendu (ed.) (1987) Amar Jiban Kahini. Calcutta: Anushilan Samity.Google Scholar
Govt of Bengal (1926) Terrorist Conspiracy in Bengal. Calcutta: BG Press.Google Scholar
Kanungo, Hem chandra (1984) Banglaye Biplob Prachesta (1928). Calcutta, Chirayata Prakashan.Google Scholar
IB Govt of India (1974) Terrorism in India (1937). Delhi: Deep Publications, reprint.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Jogesh chandra (1977) Swadhinatar Sandhaney. Calcutta: Kishore Trust.Google Scholar
Ker, J. C. (1973) Political Trouble in India (1917). Delhi: Oriental Publications, reprint.Google Scholar
Bhaumik, Madan mohan (1985) Andamaney Dosh Batsar. Calcutta: Lekhak Samabaye Samiti, reprint.Google Scholar
Sanyal, Sachindra nath (2001) Bandi Jeevan (1943), ed. by Ajijul, Haq. Calcutta: Nandanik.Google Scholar
Samaddar, Ranabir (2002) ‘Colonial Constitutionalism’, Identity, Culture and Politics, 3(1) and www.codesria.org/Links/Publications/icp/july_2002.htm.Google Scholar
Samanta, Amiya Kumar, ed. (1995) Terrorism in Bengal - A Collection of Documents, 6 volumes. Calcutta: Government of West Bengal.Google Scholar
Sen, Satadru (2000) Disciplining Punishment: Colonialism and Convict Society in the Andaman Islands. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Eric (1982) The English Utilitarians and India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, Trailokya nath (1981) Jeley Trish Bochor O Pak-Bharater Sangram. Calcutta: Anushilan Bhavan Trust Board.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2003) ‘Citizens All? Citizens Some! The Making of the Citizen’, Comparative Study of Society and History, 45(4): 650–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar