Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T21:05:39.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Lévi-Strauss to Wittgenstein: The Idea of ‘Imperfectionism’ in Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Francesco Remotti
Francesco Remotti*
Affiliation:
University of Turin, Italy
*
Francesco Remotti, University of Turin, Via Giuseppe Verdi, 8, Torino, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

According to the author, the most important lesson of Claude Lévi-Strauss at the epistemological level is the interpretation of anthropology as a transversal knowledge: its innovative definition of structure goes in this direction. The failure of its structuralism is however due to a strong and intolerable reduction of the wealth of aspects and dimensions of the ethnographic experience and the purpose to predispose a frame of limited possibilities (closed system). The author proposes to rehabilitate the thesis of anthropology as a transversal (cross-cultural) knowledge resorting to Wittgenstein's idea of family resemblances: a flexible approach (open system) that fits the needs and characteristics of anthropological research.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 60 , Issue 2: Homage to Claude Lévi-Strauss , May 2013 , pp. 40 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barry, LS (2000) L’union endogame en Afrique et à Madagascar. L’Homme 154–155: 67–100.Google Scholar
Bonte, P (2000) L’échange est-il un universel? L’Homme 154–155: 39–66.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P (1990) The Logic of Practice, transl. Nice, R. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, H (2001) A Society without Fathers or Husbands: The Na of China, transl. Hustvedt, A. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conte, É (2000) Mariages arabes: la part du féminin. L’Homme 154–155: 279–308.Google Scholar
Cuturi, FG (1988) I fratelli inseparabili: conflitti tra natolocalità e matrimonio. Rome: Bagatto.Google Scholar
Das, V (1998) Wittgenstein and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Onofrio, S (1988–1989) Nota introduttiva. Uomo & Cultura 21–22(41–44): 5–11.Google Scholar
Fassin, É (2000) Usages de la science et science des usages: à propos des familles homoparentales. L’Homme 154–155: 391–408.Google Scholar
Geertz, C (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gellner, E (1985) Relativism and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Héritier, F (1981) L’Exercice de la parenté. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lefébure, C (1981) Le mariage des cousins parallèles patrilatéraux et l’endogamie de lignée agnatique: l’anthropologie de la parenté face à la question de l’endogamie. In Breteau, CH, Lacoste-Dujardin, C, Lefébure, C, et al. (eds) Production, pouvoir et parenté dans le monde méditerranéen de Sumer à nos jours. Paris: Geuthner, pp. 195–207.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1956) The Family. In Shapiro, HL (ed) Man, Culture, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–285.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1963) Structural Anthropology, transl. Jacobson, C, Grundfest Schoepf, B. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1966) The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship, transl. Bell, JH, von Sturmer, JR, Needham, R (ed). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1983) Structural Anthropology, vol. 2, transl. Layton, M. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1988–1989) La figlia del fratello del padre: il matrimonio nel mondo arabo. Uomo & Cultura, 21–22(41–44): 11–24.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (1992) The View from Afar, transl. Neugroschel, J, Hoss, Ph. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C (2000) Postface. L’Homme 154–155: 713–720.Google Scholar
Linton, R (1936) The Study of Man: An Introduction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Murdock, GP (1949) Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, GP (1972) Anthropology's Mythology. In Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1971. London: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Needham, R (1983) Against the Tranquility of Axioms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, O (1973) Empiricism and Sociology, ed. by Neurath, M, Cohen, RS, transl. Foulkes, P, Neurath, M. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, AR (1952) Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Remotti, F (1993) Etnografia nande I: società, matrimoni, potere. Turin: Segnalibro.Google Scholar
Remotti, F (2003) De l’incomplétude. In Affergan, F, Borutti, S, Calame, C, et al., Figures de l’humain: les représentations de l’anthropologie. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, pp. 19–74.Google Scholar
Remotti, F (2008) Contro natura: una lettera al Papa. Rome-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Remotti, F (2009) Noi, primitivi: lo specchio dell’antropologia. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Solinas, PG (2004) L’acqua strangia: il declino della parentela nella società complessa. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sousberghe, L de (1973) Union structurale et alliance en Afrique Centrale. Anthropos 68(1–2): 1–92.Google Scholar
Sperber, D (1985) On Anthropological Knowledge: Three Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1953) Philosophical Investigations, transl. by Anscombe, GEM. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zolo, D (1986) Scienza e politica in Otto Neurath. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar