Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T13:08:43.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decline of Thought in the Arab World According to Muhammad ‘Abed al-Jabiri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Meryem Sebti
Meryem Sebti*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses in critical terms muhammad ‘abd al-Jabiri’s influential philosophical work. It engages, in particular, in the analysis of the assumptions underlying the radical contrast that al-Jabiri sets up between avicenna’s philosophy – which is supposed to represent irrationality and Gnosticism – and that of averroes who, according to him, breaks decisively with that current of thought and thus makes exercising philosophical thought once again possible. after a close discussion of the positions of classical philosophers (falasifa), the author concludes that it is the very validity of the notion of “arab reason” that has to be questioned in al-Jabiri’s analysis.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 2: Philosophy and Islam in Muslim Societies , May 2010 , pp. 92 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

al-Jabiri, M. ‘A. (1994) Introduction à la critique de la raison arabe, translated from Arabic by Mahfoud, A. and Geoffroy, M.. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Averroes (1996) Le livre du discours décisif, translated by Marc Geoffroy, introduction by Alain de Libera. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Badiou, A. (1989) Manifeste pour la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Corbin, H. (1999) Avicenne et le récit visionnaire. Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar
Depraz, N. and Marquet, J.F. (2000) La Gnose, une question philosophique pour une phénoménologie de l’invisible. Tours: Centre de la Renaissance.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1988) Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works, Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Leyden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1994) ‘Ibn Tufayl on Ibn Sina’s Eastern Philosophy’, Oriens, 34: 222–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, D. (2002) ‘The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. An Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy’, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 29(1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdi, M. (1990) ‘Orientalism and the Study of Islamic Philosophy’, Journal of Islamic Studies, 1: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renan, E. (1947) Œuvres complètes. Paris: Calmann-Levy.Google Scholar
Rudolph, K. (1984) The Nature and History of Gnosticism. New York: Harper One.Google Scholar
Von Kügelgen, A. (1994) Averroes und die arabische Moderne. Ansätze zu einer Neubegründung des Rationalismus im Islam. Leyden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Kügelgen, A. (1996) ‘A Call for Rationalism: ‘Arab Averroists’ in the Twentieth Century’, Alif 16: 97–132.Google Scholar