Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:22:04.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Form and Function of Poetic Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Ivan Fónagy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An attempt is made here to consider poetry as one of the aspects of language. It is not the first attempt and certainly not the last.

At first glance we are startled by the multiplicity of additional formal laws restricting the poet's free choice of expressions: intricate rhyming schemes, equal number of syllables in a line, regular distribution of short and long, stressed and unstressed syllables, alliteration, prevailing in both ancient Germanic and modern American poetry:

Paler be they than daunting death the sleek slim deer the tall tense deer.

(E. E. Cummings, All in green)

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 13 , Issue 51 , September 1965 , pp. 72 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Abernathy, R., “Mathematical Linguistics and Poetics,” Poetics, The Hague, 1961, pp. 563–570.Google Scholar
Austerlitz, R., “Problems of Parallelism,” Poetics, The Hague, 1961, pp. 439–44.Google Scholar
Bally, CH, Traité de stylistique française, Heidelberg-Paris, 1909, I–II.Google Scholar
Bühler, K., Sprachtheorie, Jena, 1934.Google Scholar
Chassé, CH, Les clefs de Mallarmé, Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Chastaing, M., “Le symbolisme des voyelles,” Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique, 55 (1958).Google Scholar
Combarieu, J., Les rapports de la musique et de la poésie, Paris, 1894.Google Scholar
De Groot, A.W., “The Description of a Poem,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists (Cambridge 1962). The Hague, 1964, pp. 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, B., Poetry Handbook, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Dionysius Of Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum, Ed. Schaeffer, A., Lipsiae, 1808.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S., The Music of Poetry: On Poetry and Poets, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Eucken, R., Über Bilder und Gleichnisse in der Philosophie, 1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I., “Die Redepausen in der Dichtung,” Phonetica, 5 (1960), pp. 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I., “Communication in Poetry,” Word, 17 (1961), pp. 194–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I., “Mimik auf glottaler Ebene,” Phonetica, 8 (1962), pp. 209–219.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I., Die Metaphern in der Phonetik, The Hague, 1963.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I., “L'information du style verbal,” Linguistics, 4 (1964), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I., “Der Ausdruck als Inhalt”, Dichtung und Mathematik, München, 1965, 243–274.Google Scholar
Freud, S., Gesammelte Werke, London, 1940-1941.Google Scholar
Gáldi, L., “Le mètre et le rythme,” Etudes Hongroises, 25 (1936-1937), pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
Guiraud, P., Language et versification d'après l'œuvre de Paul Valéry, Paris, 1953.Google Scholar
Guiraud, P., Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire, Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., “Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik III,” Sämtliche Werke, Jubiläumsausgabe.Google Scholar
Hollós, I., “Die Phasen des Selbstbewusstseinsaktes,” Intern. Z. ärztl. Psychoanalyse. 5, (1919).Google Scholar
Hollós, I., “Über das Zeitgefühl,” Intern. Z. f. Psychoanalyse, 8 (1922).Google Scholar
Huguet, E., Les métaphores et comparaisons dans l'œuvre de Victor Hugo, I–II, Paris, 1904-1905.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., “Über den Versbau der serbo-kroatischen Volksepen,” Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale, VIII–IX (1933).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Linguistics and Poetics: Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, Th., New York-London, 1960, pp. 350–377.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., “Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry" (in Russian), Poetics, The Hague, 1961, pp. 397–418.Google Scholar
Kaiser, L., Les sons du langage et leur information, Cours international de phonologie et de phoniatrie, Paris, 1953.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B., “Radical Metaphor, Aesthetics, and the Origin of Language,” Rev. exist. psychology and psychiatry (1962).Google Scholar
Konrad, H., Etude sur la metaphore, Paris, 1939.Google Scholar
Levin, S.R., “Poetry and Grammaticalness,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists (Cambridge 1962). The Hague 1964, pp. 308–314.Google Scholar
Macdermott, M.M., “Vowel Sounds and Poetry. Their Music and Tone-Colour,” Psyche Monographs, No. 13, London, 1940.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, ST, Œuvres complètes, Paris, 1945.Google Scholar
Marks, B.A., E. E. Cummings, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Mauron, CH, Introduction à la psychoanalyse de Mallarmé, Neuchâtel, 1950.Google Scholar
Michaud, G., Mallarmé. L'homme et l'œuvre, Paris, 1953.Google Scholar
Moles, A.A., Théorie de l'information et perception esthétique, Paris, 1958.Google Scholar
Mondor, H., Mallarme plus intime, Paris, 1944.Google Scholar
Newman, S., “Farther Experiments on Phonetic Symbolism,” American Journal of Psychology, 45, (1933), pp. 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, N., Metrische Stildifferenzen in den Satiren des Horaz, Studia Latina Holmiensa I, Uppsala, 1952.Google Scholar
Pierce, J.R., Symbols, Signals, and Noise, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
Rank, O., Der Künstler und andere Beiträge zur Psychoanalyse des dichterischen Schaffens, Leipzig-Wien-Zürich, 1925.Google Scholar
Reitz, H., Impressionistische und expressionistische Stilmittel bei Rim-baud, München, 1937.Google Scholar
Richards, I.A., Principles of Literary Criticism, New York, 1930Google Scholar
Sapir, E., “A Study in Phonetic Symbolism,“ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, (1929), pp. 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewel, E., The Structure of Poetry, New York, 1952.Google Scholar
Spire, A., Plaisir poétique et plaisir musculaire, Paris, 1949.Google Scholar
Spitz, R., “Wiederholung, Rhythmus, Langeweile,” Imago, 22 (1937).Google Scholar
Spitzer, L., Language of Poetry: Language, An Inquiry into its Meaning and Function, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C.F.P., Het begrip Metaphoor. En taalkundig en wijsgeerig onderzoek, Amsterdam-Paris, 1941.Google Scholar
Trojan, F., Sprachrhythmus und vegetatives Nervensystem, Wien, 1951.Google Scholar
Trojan, F., Der Ausdruck der Sprechstimme, 2, Wien, 1952.Google Scholar
Varendonck, J.B., Über das vorbewusste phantasierende Denken, Leipzig-Wien-Zürich, 1922.Google Scholar
Wissemann, H., Untersuchungen zur Onomatopoiie, Heidelberg, 1954.Google Scholar