Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:25:21.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Weak and the Strong RTM: Stich's Interpretation of Fodor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Ausonio Marras
Ausonio Marras
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Summer 1987 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stich, S. P., From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983). References to this book will be given parenthetically in the textGoogle Scholar.

2 Fodor's, J. A. classic formulation and defence of the RTM is in his book The Language of Thought (New York: Crowell, 1975)Google Scholar. See also relevant essays in his book Representations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

3 See J. A. Fodor, “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology”, in Representations.

4 In referring to the RTM I shall henceforth be referring to the computational form of the theory.

5 On the STM, see my Critical Notice of Stich's, book in Philosophy of Science 54 (1987)Google Scholar.

6 See J. A. Fodor, “Special Sciences”, in Representations.

7 I am grateful to Jerry Fodor and William Demopoulos for their helpful comments. I am also grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for support in this research.